Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis

More than 75% of cost utility analyses were published one year or more after publication of the trial's clinical results Comment We found a substantial delay in the publication of cost utility analyses, suggesting that reliable economic data are usually not available, at least in peer reviewed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ 2004-06, Vol.328 (7455), p.1536-1537
Main Authors: Greenberg, Dan, Rosen, Allison B, Olchanski, Natalia V, Stone, Patricia W, Nadai, John, Neumann, Peter J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Benefit cost analysis
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic
Confidence intervals
Cost analysis
Cost control
Cost effectiveness analysis
Cost efficiency
Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data
Economic costs
Economic utility
Experimentation
Health care costs
Impact factors
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Publishing
Quality of life
Registries
Studies
Time Factors
Utilities costs
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-1185a4c7ba186aeab1834d29e3d2cf4afa9d030e4e40b1327ce70b999d966e043
cites
container_end_page 1537
container_issue 7455
container_start_page 1536
container_title BMJ
container_volume 328
creator Greenberg, Dan
Rosen, Allison B
Olchanski, Natalia V
Stone, Patricia W
Nadai, John
Neumann, Peter J
description More than 75% of cost utility analyses were published one year or more after publication of the trial's clinical results Comment We found a substantial delay in the publication of cost utility analyses, suggesting that reliable economic data are usually not available, at least in peer reviewed journals, for decision makers when decisions on adoption and reimbursement are typically made. [...]compared with trial results, dissemination of cost utility analyses takes place in journals with lower readership and influence.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.38079.502326.AE
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_437145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41708106</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41708106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-1185a4c7ba186aeab1834d29e3d2cf4afa9d030e4e40b1327ce70b999d966e043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd2LEzEUxQdR3LLuXyDKoOjb1JtJJh-CD7XWD1iUBRXxJWQymZqaTtYkI_a_N92pdRUEnwL3_M7NPZyiuItgjhCmT9rtZo45MDFvoMY1nS9WN4oZIpRXDcf4ZjED0YiKI8xPirMYNwCZY1zQ5nZxghoEgAifFeaFcWoXSzuUl2PrrFbJ-qH0fal9TOWYrLNpV6pBuV00MU-HbtTJdKVyflhH25lSOztkoytTsMrFp2UwaxtT-GWz8U5xq8-KOTu8p8WHl6v3y9fV-btXb5aL86ptOEkVQrxRRLNWIU6VUS3imHS1MLirdU9Ur0QHGAwxBFqEa6YNg1YI0QlKDRB8Wjyb9uYsW9NpM6SgnLwMdqvCTnpl5Z_KYL_Itf8uCWaINNn_-OAP_ttoYpJbG7VxTg3Gj1FSShsGbA8--Avc-DHktFHWQACEwDhDD_8FIcYYr7m4uhlPlA4-xmD647kI5L5rmbuWV13LqWu5WGXX_etJf3sOzWbg0QFQMXfTBzVoG69x-fO8LHP3Jm4Tkw9HnSAGHAHNejXpuVHz46ir8FVShlkj335cyucX9QWwz5-kyPx84vdX_0-Sn_le2sY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777828904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Greenberg, Dan ; Rosen, Allison B ; Olchanski, Natalia V ; Stone, Patricia W ; Nadai, John ; Neumann, Peter J</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Dan ; Rosen, Allison B ; Olchanski, Natalia V ; Stone, Patricia W ; Nadai, John ; Neumann, Peter J</creatorcontrib><description>More than 75% of cost utility analyses were published one year or more after publication of the trial's clinical results Comment We found a substantial delay in the publication of cost utility analyses, suggesting that reliable economic data are usually not available, at least in peer reviewed journals, for decision makers when decisions on adoption and reimbursement are typically made. [...]compared with trial results, dissemination of cost utility analyses takes place in journals with lower readership and influence.</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38079.502326.AE</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15100148</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Benefit cost analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Confidence intervals ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Cost effectiveness analysis ; Cost efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Economic costs ; Economic utility ; Experimentation ; Health care costs ; Impact factors ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Publishing ; Quality of life ; Registries ; Studies ; Time Factors ; Utilities costs</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2004-06, Vol.328 (7455), p.1536-1537</ispartof><rights>2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2004 (c) 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group Jun 26, 2004</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-1185a4c7ba186aeab1834d29e3d2cf4afa9d030e4e40b1327ce70b999d966e043</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/328/7455/1536.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/328/7455/1536.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,780,784,885,3194,27924,27925,30999,58238,58471,77594,77595</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15890232$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15100148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Allison B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olchanski, Natalia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Patricia W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadai, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Peter J</creatorcontrib><title>Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>More than 75% of cost utility analyses were published one year or more after publication of the trial's clinical results Comment We found a substantial delay in the publication of cost utility analyses, suggesting that reliable economic data are usually not available, at least in peer reviewed journals, for decision makers when decisions on adoption and reimbursement are typically made. [...]compared with trial results, dissemination of cost utility analyses takes place in journals with lower readership and influence.</description><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>Economic utility</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Impact factors</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Utilities costs</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd2LEzEUxQdR3LLuXyDKoOjb1JtJJh-CD7XWD1iUBRXxJWQymZqaTtYkI_a_N92pdRUEnwL3_M7NPZyiuItgjhCmT9rtZo45MDFvoMY1nS9WN4oZIpRXDcf4ZjED0YiKI8xPirMYNwCZY1zQ5nZxghoEgAifFeaFcWoXSzuUl2PrrFbJ-qH0fal9TOWYrLNpV6pBuV00MU-HbtTJdKVyflhH25lSOztkoytTsMrFp2UwaxtT-GWz8U5xq8-KOTu8p8WHl6v3y9fV-btXb5aL86ptOEkVQrxRRLNWIU6VUS3imHS1MLirdU9Ur0QHGAwxBFqEa6YNg1YI0QlKDRB8Wjyb9uYsW9NpM6SgnLwMdqvCTnpl5Z_KYL_Itf8uCWaINNn_-OAP_ttoYpJbG7VxTg3Gj1FSShsGbA8--Avc-DHktFHWQACEwDhDD_8FIcYYr7m4uhlPlA4-xmD647kI5L5rmbuWV13LqWu5WGXX_etJf3sOzWbg0QFQMXfTBzVoG69x-fO8LHP3Jm4Tkw9HnSAGHAHNejXpuVHz46ir8FVShlkj335cyucX9QWwz5-kyPx84vdX_0-Sn_le2sY</recordid><startdate>20040626</startdate><enddate>20040626</enddate><creator>Greenberg, Dan</creator><creator>Rosen, Allison B</creator><creator>Olchanski, Natalia V</creator><creator>Stone, Patricia W</creator><creator>Nadai, John</creator><creator>Neumann, Peter J</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040626</creationdate><title>Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis</title><author>Greenberg, Dan ; Rosen, Allison B ; Olchanski, Natalia V ; Stone, Patricia W ; Nadai, John ; Neumann, Peter J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-1185a4c7ba186aeab1834d29e3d2cf4afa9d030e4e40b1327ce70b999d966e043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>Economic utility</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Impact factors</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Utilities costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Allison B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olchanski, Natalia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Patricia W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadai, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Peter J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenberg, Dan</au><au>Rosen, Allison B</au><au>Olchanski, Natalia V</au><au>Stone, Patricia W</au><au>Nadai, John</au><au>Neumann, Peter J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2004-06-26</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>328</volume><issue>7455</issue><spage>1536</spage><epage>1537</epage><pages>1536-1537</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>More than 75% of cost utility analyses were published one year or more after publication of the trial's clinical results Comment We found a substantial delay in the publication of cost utility analyses, suggesting that reliable economic data are usually not available, at least in peer reviewed journals, for decision makers when decisions on adoption and reimbursement are typically made. [...]compared with trial results, dissemination of cost utility analyses takes place in journals with lower readership and influence.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>15100148</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.38079.502326.AE</doi><tpages>2</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8138
ispartof BMJ, 2004-06, Vol.328 (7455), p.1536-1537
issn 0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_437145
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals
subjects Benefit cost analysis
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic
Confidence intervals
Cost analysis
Cost control
Cost effectiveness analysis
Cost efficiency
Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data
Economic costs
Economic utility
Experimentation
Health care costs
Impact factors
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Publishing
Quality of life
Registries
Studies
Time Factors
Utilities costs
title Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delays%20in%20publication%20of%20cost%20utility%20analyses%20conducted%20alongside%20clinical%20trials:%20registry%20analysis&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Greenberg,%20Dan&rft.date=2004-06-26&rft.volume=328&rft.issue=7455&rft.spage=1536&rft.epage=1537&rft.pages=1536-1537&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.38079.502326.AE&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41708106%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-1185a4c7ba186aeab1834d29e3d2cf4afa9d030e4e40b1327ce70b999d966e043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777828904&rft_id=info:pmid/15100148&rft_jstor_id=41708106&rfr_iscdi=true