Loading…

Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory

Competition is ubiquitous in perception. For example, items in the visual field compete for processing resources, and attention controls their priority (biased competition). The inevitable ambiguity in the interpretation of sensory signals yields another form of competition: distinct perceptual inte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2015-03, Vol.1339 (1), p.138-153
Main Authors: Marx, Svenja, Gruenhage, Gina, Walper, Daniel, Rutishauser, Ueli, Einhäuser, Wolfgang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6225-3e7fe8c5c59b81c5a1f24009ac09df2ca2f1051c18ca033627d588332a379ba23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6225-3e7fe8c5c59b81c5a1f24009ac09df2ca2f1051c18ca033627d588332a379ba23
container_end_page 153
container_issue 1
container_start_page 138
container_title Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
container_volume 1339
creator Marx, Svenja
Gruenhage, Gina
Walper, Daniel
Rutishauser, Ueli
Einhäuser, Wolfgang
description Competition is ubiquitous in perception. For example, items in the visual field compete for processing resources, and attention controls their priority (biased competition). The inevitable ambiguity in the interpretation of sensory signals yields another form of competition: distinct perceptual interpretations compete for access to awareness. Rivalry, where two equally likely percepts compete for dominance, explicates the latter form of competition. Building upon the similarity between attention and rivalry, we propose to model rivalry by a generic competitive circuit that is widely used in the attention literature—a winner‐take‐all (WTA) network. Specifically, we show that a network of two coupled WTA circuits replicates three common hallmarks of rivalry: the distribution of dominance durations, their dependence on input strength (“Levelt's propositions”), and the effects of stimulus removal (blanking). This model introduces a form of memory by forming discrete states and explains experimental data better than competitive models of rivalry without memory. This result supports the crucial role of memory in rivalry specifically and in competitive processes in general. Our approach unifies the seemingly distinct phenomena of rivalry, memory, and attention in a single model with competition as the common underlying principle.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nyas.12575
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4376592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1677967644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6225-3e7fe8c5c59b81c5a1f24009ac09df2ca2f1051c18ca033627d588332a379ba23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModq3e-ANkwBsRpuZj8jFeFMqiVVgqUqXoTchmM7vpZpI1yXQ7_96Z3XZRL9TcJHCe9805hxeA5wieoOG88b1KJwhTTh-ACeJVXTJG8EMwgZDzUtSYHIEnKV1DiLCo-GNwhCkVaChOwO00tBuTbbbBF1ubV4Xyi90jdLnYRBuizX2hg88xuLeFs35t_bKI9ka52Bc5FCpn43f6vIqhW64GufcmllmtTamcK7zJ2xDXaf9Ba9oQ-6fgUaNcMs_u7mPw9f27L9MP5ezT-cfp2azUDGNaEsMbIzTVtJ4LpKlCDa4grJWG9aLBWuEGQYo0ElpBQhjmCyoEIVgRXs8VJsfgdO-76eatWeih1aicHCZrVexlUFb-XvF2JZfhRlaEM1qPBq_uDGL40ZmUZWuTNs4pb0KXJOKUUMwEhv9GGec146yq_gNlnFQMV2MDL_9Ar0MX_bC0HcUoqvlIvd5TOoaUomkOIyIox5jIMSZyF5MBfvHrUg7ofS4GAO2BrXWm_4uVvPh2dnlvWu41NmVze9CouJbDLAN6dXEuxQx-vhKzS_md_ASs29nG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667651972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Marx, Svenja ; Gruenhage, Gina ; Walper, Daniel ; Rutishauser, Ueli ; Einhäuser, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Marx, Svenja ; Gruenhage, Gina ; Walper, Daniel ; Rutishauser, Ueli ; Einhäuser, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Competition is ubiquitous in perception. For example, items in the visual field compete for processing resources, and attention controls their priority (biased competition). The inevitable ambiguity in the interpretation of sensory signals yields another form of competition: distinct perceptual interpretations compete for access to awareness. Rivalry, where two equally likely percepts compete for dominance, explicates the latter form of competition. Building upon the similarity between attention and rivalry, we propose to model rivalry by a generic competitive circuit that is widely used in the attention literature—a winner‐take‐all (WTA) network. Specifically, we show that a network of two coupled WTA circuits replicates three common hallmarks of rivalry: the distribution of dominance durations, their dependence on input strength (“Levelt's propositions”), and the effects of stimulus removal (blanking). This model introduces a form of memory by forming discrete states and explains experimental data better than competitive models of rivalry without memory. This result supports the crucial role of memory in rivalry specifically and in competitive processes in general. Our approach unifies the seemingly distinct phenomena of rivalry, memory, and attention in a single model with competition as the common underlying principle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25581077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANYAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; attention ; Attention - physiology ; binocular rivalry ; Blanking ; Circuits ; Competition ; Construction ; Dominance ; Female ; Humans ; Joining ; Male ; Memory - physiology ; modeling ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Networks ; Neural Inhibition - physiology ; Original ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Priorities ; psychophysics ; vision ; Visual Perception - physiology ; winner-take-all network ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2015-03, Vol.1339 (1), p.138-153</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of The New York Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of The New York Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2015 The New York Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>2015 The New York Academy of Sciences 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6225-3e7fe8c5c59b81c5a1f24009ac09df2ca2f1051c18ca033627d588332a379ba23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6225-3e7fe8c5c59b81c5a1f24009ac09df2ca2f1051c18ca033627d588332a379ba23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7516-9589</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marx, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruenhage, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walper, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutishauser, Ueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einhäuser, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci</addtitle><description>Competition is ubiquitous in perception. For example, items in the visual field compete for processing resources, and attention controls their priority (biased competition). The inevitable ambiguity in the interpretation of sensory signals yields another form of competition: distinct perceptual interpretations compete for access to awareness. Rivalry, where two equally likely percepts compete for dominance, explicates the latter form of competition. Building upon the similarity between attention and rivalry, we propose to model rivalry by a generic competitive circuit that is widely used in the attention literature—a winner‐take‐all (WTA) network. Specifically, we show that a network of two coupled WTA circuits replicates three common hallmarks of rivalry: the distribution of dominance durations, their dependence on input strength (“Levelt's propositions”), and the effects of stimulus removal (blanking). This model introduces a form of memory by forming discrete states and explains experimental data better than competitive models of rivalry without memory. This result supports the crucial role of memory in rivalry specifically and in competitive processes in general. Our approach unifies the seemingly distinct phenomena of rivalry, memory, and attention in a single model with competition as the common underlying principle.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>binocular rivalry</subject><subject>Blanking</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joining</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - physiology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>psychophysics</subject><subject>vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>winner-take-all network</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModq3e-ANkwBsRpuZj8jFeFMqiVVgqUqXoTchmM7vpZpI1yXQ7_96Z3XZRL9TcJHCe9805hxeA5wieoOG88b1KJwhTTh-ACeJVXTJG8EMwgZDzUtSYHIEnKV1DiLCo-GNwhCkVaChOwO00tBuTbbbBF1ubV4Xyi90jdLnYRBuizX2hg88xuLeFs35t_bKI9ka52Bc5FCpn43f6vIqhW64GufcmllmtTamcK7zJ2xDXaf9Ba9oQ-6fgUaNcMs_u7mPw9f27L9MP5ezT-cfp2azUDGNaEsMbIzTVtJ4LpKlCDa4grJWG9aLBWuEGQYo0ElpBQhjmCyoEIVgRXs8VJsfgdO-76eatWeih1aicHCZrVexlUFb-XvF2JZfhRlaEM1qPBq_uDGL40ZmUZWuTNs4pb0KXJOKUUMwEhv9GGec146yq_gNlnFQMV2MDL_9Ar0MX_bC0HcUoqvlIvd5TOoaUomkOIyIox5jIMSZyF5MBfvHrUg7ofS4GAO2BrXWm_4uVvPh2dnlvWu41NmVze9CouJbDLAN6dXEuxQx-vhKzS_md_ASs29nG</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Marx, Svenja</creator><creator>Gruenhage, Gina</creator><creator>Walper, Daniel</creator><creator>Rutishauser, Ueli</creator><creator>Einhäuser, Wolfgang</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-9589</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory</title><author>Marx, Svenja ; Gruenhage, Gina ; Walper, Daniel ; Rutishauser, Ueli ; Einhäuser, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6225-3e7fe8c5c59b81c5a1f24009ac09df2ca2f1051c18ca033627d588332a379ba23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>binocular rivalry</topic><topic>Blanking</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joining</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - physiology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>psychophysics</topic><topic>vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>winner-take-all network</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marx, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruenhage, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walper, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutishauser, Ueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einhäuser, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marx, Svenja</au><au>Gruenhage, Gina</au><au>Walper, Daniel</au><au>Rutishauser, Ueli</au><au>Einhäuser, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1339</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>138-153</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><coden>ANYAA9</coden><abstract>Competition is ubiquitous in perception. For example, items in the visual field compete for processing resources, and attention controls their priority (biased competition). The inevitable ambiguity in the interpretation of sensory signals yields another form of competition: distinct perceptual interpretations compete for access to awareness. Rivalry, where two equally likely percepts compete for dominance, explicates the latter form of competition. Building upon the similarity between attention and rivalry, we propose to model rivalry by a generic competitive circuit that is widely used in the attention literature—a winner‐take‐all (WTA) network. Specifically, we show that a network of two coupled WTA circuits replicates three common hallmarks of rivalry: the distribution of dominance durations, their dependence on input strength (“Levelt's propositions”), and the effects of stimulus removal (blanking). This model introduces a form of memory by forming discrete states and explains experimental data better than competitive models of rivalry without memory. This result supports the crucial role of memory in rivalry specifically and in competitive processes in general. Our approach unifies the seemingly distinct phenomena of rivalry, memory, and attention in a single model with competition as the common underlying principle.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25581077</pmid><doi>10.1111/nyas.12575</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-9589</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0077-8923
ispartof Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2015-03, Vol.1339 (1), p.138-153
issn 0077-8923
1749-6632
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4376592
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
attention
Attention - physiology
binocular rivalry
Blanking
Circuits
Competition
Construction
Dominance
Female
Humans
Joining
Male
Memory - physiology
modeling
Nerve Net - physiology
Networks
Neural Inhibition - physiology
Original
Photic Stimulation - methods
Priorities
psychophysics
vision
Visual Perception - physiology
winner-take-all network
Young Adult
title Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A47%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition%20with%20and%20without%20priority%20control:%20linking%20rivalry%20to%20attention%20through%20winner-take-all%20networks%20with%20memory&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=Marx,%20Svenja&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=1339&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=138-153&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft.coden=ANYAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nyas.12575&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1677967644%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6225-3e7fe8c5c59b81c5a1f24009ac09df2ca2f1051c18ca033627d588332a379ba23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667651972&rft_id=info:pmid/25581077&rfr_iscdi=true