Device or ice: the effect of consistent cooling using a device compared with intermittent cooling using an ice bag after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose : To determine the comparative effectiveness of consistent cooling using an icing device (DonJoy Iceman, DJO Canada, Mississauga, ON) versus intermittent cooling using an ice bag (usual care) for the first 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Method : A sample of 78 patients (interv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiotherapy Canada 2015, Vol.67 (1), p.48-55
Main Authors: Bech, Michelle, Moorhen, Joanne, Cho, Mary, Lavergne, M Ruth, Stothers, Keith, Hoens, Alison M
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-7bf604486a9a6beef126aa9d147adf16a64a4a616cdebd522086107260854c843
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-7bf604486a9a6beef126aa9d147adf16a64a4a616cdebd522086107260854c843
container_end_page 55
container_issue 1
container_start_page 48
container_title Physiotherapy Canada
container_volume 67
creator Bech, Michelle
Moorhen, Joanne
Cho, Mary
Lavergne, M Ruth
Stothers, Keith
Hoens, Alison M
description Purpose : To determine the comparative effectiveness of consistent cooling using an icing device (DonJoy Iceman, DJO Canada, Mississauga, ON) versus intermittent cooling using an ice bag (usual care) for the first 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Method : A sample of 78 patients (intervention group, n=37; control group, n=34) undergoing primary TKA were randomized to intervention (device) or control (ice) groups. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Secondary outcomes were passive range of motion (PROM), nausea or vomiting, opioid use, blood loss, lower limb function, hospital length of stay, and patient-reported compliance and satisfaction. Results : No significant differences in the primary outcome (pain intensity measured via NPRS) were observed between control and intervention groups. Patients in the intervention group were significantly more satisfied (8.4 vs. 6.0, p=0.002); used the device more consistently, day and night (85.7% vs. 29.6% and 87.6% vs. 30.8%, respectively, p
doi_str_mv 10.3138/ptc.2013-78
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4403323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1677894836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-7bf604486a9a6beef126aa9d147adf16a64a4a616cdebd522086107260854c843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFLHTEQxkNp0af11LvkWJC1ySabzXooFK21IHix5zCbnfjS7m7WJM_if9E_uXk8Kxa8zAzMb75v4CPkA2enggv9acn2tGZcVK1-Q1a8ZbrSZfGWrJhgrGIN0_vkIKWfjNUdF90e2a-bTnDViBX5c4EP3iINkZZ2RvMaKTqHNtPgqA1z8injnMsYRj_f0U3aVqDD7s6GaYGIA_3t85r6OWOcfH7tYt4a0B7K6ApFc8gw0l8zIoWY1zEsI6T8-J68czAmPHrqh-TH5dfb86vq-ubb9_Mv15UVmueq7Z1iUmoFHage0fFaAXQDly0MjitQEiQoruyA_dDUNdOKs7ZWTDfSaikOyeed7rLpJxxs-TjCaJboJ4iPJoA3_29mvzZ34cFIyYSoRRH4-CQQw_0GUzaTTxbHEWYMm2S4alvdSS1UQU92qI0hpYju2YYzs83QlAzNNkPT6kIfv_zsmf0XmvgLDvSbUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677894836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Device or ice: the effect of consistent cooling using a device compared with intermittent cooling using an ice bag after total knee arthroplasty</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bech, Michelle ; Moorhen, Joanne ; Cho, Mary ; Lavergne, M Ruth ; Stothers, Keith ; Hoens, Alison M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bech, Michelle ; Moorhen, Joanne ; Cho, Mary ; Lavergne, M Ruth ; Stothers, Keith ; Hoens, Alison M</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose : To determine the comparative effectiveness of consistent cooling using an icing device (DonJoy Iceman, DJO Canada, Mississauga, ON) versus intermittent cooling using an ice bag (usual care) for the first 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Method : A sample of 78 patients (intervention group, n=37; control group, n=34) undergoing primary TKA were randomized to intervention (device) or control (ice) groups. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Secondary outcomes were passive range of motion (PROM), nausea or vomiting, opioid use, blood loss, lower limb function, hospital length of stay, and patient-reported compliance and satisfaction. Results : No significant differences in the primary outcome (pain intensity measured via NPRS) were observed between control and intervention groups. Patients in the intervention group were significantly more satisfied (8.4 vs. 6.0, p=0.002); used the device more consistently, day and night (85.7% vs. 29.6% and 87.6% vs. 30.8%, respectively, p&lt;0.001); and were more likely to recommend this method of cooling (96.8% vs. 68.0%, p=0.004). Conclusion : The study found no additional benefit of consistent cryotherapy using the icing device over intermittent ice bags on postoperative pain, PROM, nausea or vomiting, opioid use, blood loss, lower limb function, or length of stay, despite significant differences in patient-reported compliance and satisfaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0508</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2013-78</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25931653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: University of Toronto Press Incorporated</publisher><ispartof>Physiotherapy Canada, 2015, Vol.67 (1), p.48-55</ispartof><rights>Canadian Physiotherapy Association, 2015. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-7bf604486a9a6beef126aa9d147adf16a64a4a616cdebd522086107260854c843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-7bf604486a9a6beef126aa9d147adf16a64a4a616cdebd522086107260854c843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403323/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403323/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25931653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bech, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorhen, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavergne, M Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stothers, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoens, Alison M</creatorcontrib><title>Device or ice: the effect of consistent cooling using a device compared with intermittent cooling using an ice bag after total knee arthroplasty</title><title>Physiotherapy Canada</title><addtitle>Physiother Can</addtitle><description>Purpose : To determine the comparative effectiveness of consistent cooling using an icing device (DonJoy Iceman, DJO Canada, Mississauga, ON) versus intermittent cooling using an ice bag (usual care) for the first 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Method : A sample of 78 patients (intervention group, n=37; control group, n=34) undergoing primary TKA were randomized to intervention (device) or control (ice) groups. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Secondary outcomes were passive range of motion (PROM), nausea or vomiting, opioid use, blood loss, lower limb function, hospital length of stay, and patient-reported compliance and satisfaction. Results : No significant differences in the primary outcome (pain intensity measured via NPRS) were observed between control and intervention groups. Patients in the intervention group were significantly more satisfied (8.4 vs. 6.0, p=0.002); used the device more consistently, day and night (85.7% vs. 29.6% and 87.6% vs. 30.8%, respectively, p&lt;0.001); and were more likely to recommend this method of cooling (96.8% vs. 68.0%, p=0.004). Conclusion : The study found no additional benefit of consistent cryotherapy using the icing device over intermittent ice bags on postoperative pain, PROM, nausea or vomiting, opioid use, blood loss, lower limb function, or length of stay, despite significant differences in patient-reported compliance and satisfaction.</description><issn>0300-0508</issn><issn>1708-8313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkcFLHTEQxkNp0af11LvkWJC1ySabzXooFK21IHix5zCbnfjS7m7WJM_if9E_uXk8Kxa8zAzMb75v4CPkA2enggv9acn2tGZcVK1-Q1a8ZbrSZfGWrJhgrGIN0_vkIKWfjNUdF90e2a-bTnDViBX5c4EP3iINkZZ2RvMaKTqHNtPgqA1z8injnMsYRj_f0U3aVqDD7s6GaYGIA_3t85r6OWOcfH7tYt4a0B7K6ApFc8gw0l8zIoWY1zEsI6T8-J68czAmPHrqh-TH5dfb86vq-ubb9_Mv15UVmueq7Z1iUmoFHage0fFaAXQDly0MjitQEiQoruyA_dDUNdOKs7ZWTDfSaikOyeed7rLpJxxs-TjCaJboJ4iPJoA3_29mvzZ34cFIyYSoRRH4-CQQw_0GUzaTTxbHEWYMm2S4alvdSS1UQU92qI0hpYju2YYzs83QlAzNNkPT6kIfv_zsmf0XmvgLDvSbUw</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Bech, Michelle</creator><creator>Moorhen, Joanne</creator><creator>Cho, Mary</creator><creator>Lavergne, M Ruth</creator><creator>Stothers, Keith</creator><creator>Hoens, Alison M</creator><general>University of Toronto Press Incorporated</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Device or ice: the effect of consistent cooling using a device compared with intermittent cooling using an ice bag after total knee arthroplasty</title><author>Bech, Michelle ; Moorhen, Joanne ; Cho, Mary ; Lavergne, M Ruth ; Stothers, Keith ; Hoens, Alison M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-7bf604486a9a6beef126aa9d147adf16a64a4a616cdebd522086107260854c843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bech, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorhen, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavergne, M Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stothers, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoens, Alison M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Physiotherapy Canada</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bech, Michelle</au><au>Moorhen, Joanne</au><au>Cho, Mary</au><au>Lavergne, M Ruth</au><au>Stothers, Keith</au><au>Hoens, Alison M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Device or ice: the effect of consistent cooling using a device compared with intermittent cooling using an ice bag after total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Physiotherapy Canada</jtitle><addtitle>Physiother Can</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>48-55</pages><issn>0300-0508</issn><eissn>1708-8313</eissn><abstract>Purpose : To determine the comparative effectiveness of consistent cooling using an icing device (DonJoy Iceman, DJO Canada, Mississauga, ON) versus intermittent cooling using an ice bag (usual care) for the first 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Method : A sample of 78 patients (intervention group, n=37; control group, n=34) undergoing primary TKA were randomized to intervention (device) or control (ice) groups. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Secondary outcomes were passive range of motion (PROM), nausea or vomiting, opioid use, blood loss, lower limb function, hospital length of stay, and patient-reported compliance and satisfaction. Results : No significant differences in the primary outcome (pain intensity measured via NPRS) were observed between control and intervention groups. Patients in the intervention group were significantly more satisfied (8.4 vs. 6.0, p=0.002); used the device more consistently, day and night (85.7% vs. 29.6% and 87.6% vs. 30.8%, respectively, p&lt;0.001); and were more likely to recommend this method of cooling (96.8% vs. 68.0%, p=0.004). Conclusion : The study found no additional benefit of consistent cryotherapy using the icing device over intermittent ice bags on postoperative pain, PROM, nausea or vomiting, opioid use, blood loss, lower limb function, or length of stay, despite significant differences in patient-reported compliance and satisfaction.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>University of Toronto Press Incorporated</pub><pmid>25931653</pmid><doi>10.3138/ptc.2013-78</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-0508
ispartof Physiotherapy Canada, 2015, Vol.67 (1), p.48-55
issn 0300-0508
1708-8313
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4403323
source PubMed Central
title Device or ice: the effect of consistent cooling using a device compared with intermittent cooling using an ice bag after total knee arthroplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A23%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Device%20or%20ice:%20the%20effect%20of%20consistent%20cooling%20using%20a%20device%20compared%20with%20intermittent%20cooling%20using%20an%20ice%20bag%20after%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Physiotherapy%20Canada&rft.au=Bech,%20Michelle&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=48-55&rft.issn=0300-0508&rft.eissn=1708-8313&rft_id=info:doi/10.3138/ptc.2013-78&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1677894836%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-7bf604486a9a6beef126aa9d147adf16a64a4a616cdebd522086107260854c843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677894836&rft_id=info:pmid/25931653&rfr_iscdi=true