Loading…
Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging
To compare differences between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) using two-point Dixon fat-water separation (Dixon-VIBE) and chemically selective fat saturation (FS-VIBE) with magnetic resonance imaging examination. Forty-nine patients were included, who were scanned with two VI...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2015-04, Vol.21 (16), p.5017-5022 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-28225ade21a5647e7539edad3d9b43d6cf1fb561e520b7381b3bc8f43fab04e33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-28225ade21a5647e7539edad3d9b43d6cf1fb561e520b7381b3bc8f43fab04e33 |
container_end_page | 5022 |
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 5017 |
container_title | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Ding, Ying Rao, Sheng-Xiang Chen, Cai-Zhong Li, Ren-Chen Zeng, Meng-Su |
description | To compare differences between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) using two-point Dixon fat-water separation (Dixon-VIBE) and chemically selective fat saturation (FS-VIBE) with magnetic resonance imaging examination.
Forty-nine patients were included, who were scanned with two VIBE sequences (Dixon-VIBE and FS-VIBE) in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration. Subjective evaluations including sharpness of tumor, sharpness of vessels, strength and homogeneity of fat suppression, and artifacts that were scored using a 4-point scale. The liver-to-lesion contrast was also calculated and compared.
Dixon-VIBE with water reconstruction had significantly higher subjective scores than FS-VIBE in strength and homogeneity of fat suppression (< 0.0001) but lower scores in sharpness of tumor (P < 0.0001), sharpness of vessels (P = 0.0001), and artifacts (P = 0.034). The liver-to-lesion contrast on Dixon-VIBE images was significantly lower than that on FS-VIBE (16.6% ± 9.4% vs 23.9% ± 12.1%, P = 0.0001).
Dixon-VIBE provides stronger and more homogenous fat suppression than FS-VIBE, while has lower clarity of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5017 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4408476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680180946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-28225ade21a5647e7539edad3d9b43d6cf1fb561e520b7381b3bc8f43fab04e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkbtPHDEQhy0EgoPQU0Uuafbi174apIhAEgmJJtSW1x7vGe3Zh-178N_HGwhKKkvze3hGH0JXlCx5K7ov--dxuWN06WizrAltj9CCMdpXrBPkGC0oIW3Vc9aeofOUnglhnNfsFJ2xuhezf4EOTwnsdvKQEg4W532oNsH5jL-5Q_DYqlztVYaIE2xUVNmVYQa98u5lC9h5PCoTDpCdxko7U4FfKa_B4MntSmqtRv9HjJCCnxXsysz58RM6sWpKcPn-XqCn-7tftz-qh8fvP2-_PlRaNCyXSxirlQFGVd2IFtqa92CU4aYfBDeNttQOdUOhZmRoeUcHPujOCm7VQARwfoFu3no322ENRoPPUU1yE8se8VUG5eT_incrOYadFIJ0om1KwfV7QQzl5pTl2iUN06Q8hG2StOkI7UgvZit5s-oYUopgP76hRM7AZAEmCzBZgMkZQIl8_ne9j8BfQvw3aK2W2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680180946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ding, Ying ; Rao, Sheng-Xiang ; Chen, Cai-Zhong ; Li, Ren-Chen ; Zeng, Meng-Su</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ying ; Rao, Sheng-Xiang ; Chen, Cai-Zhong ; Li, Ren-Chen ; Zeng, Meng-Su</creatorcontrib><description>To compare differences between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) using two-point Dixon fat-water separation (Dixon-VIBE) and chemically selective fat saturation (FS-VIBE) with magnetic resonance imaging examination.
Forty-nine patients were included, who were scanned with two VIBE sequences (Dixon-VIBE and FS-VIBE) in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration. Subjective evaluations including sharpness of tumor, sharpness of vessels, strength and homogeneity of fat suppression, and artifacts that were scored using a 4-point scale. The liver-to-lesion contrast was also calculated and compared.
Dixon-VIBE with water reconstruction had significantly higher subjective scores than FS-VIBE in strength and homogeneity of fat suppression (< 0.0001) but lower scores in sharpness of tumor (P < 0.0001), sharpness of vessels (P = 0.0001), and artifacts (P = 0.034). The liver-to-lesion contrast on Dixon-VIBE images was significantly lower than that on FS-VIBE (16.6% ± 9.4% vs 23.9% ± 12.1%, P = 0.0001).
Dixon-VIBE provides stronger and more homogenous fat suppression than FS-VIBE, while has lower clarity of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25945017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - chemistry ; Adipose Tissue - pathology ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body Water ; Breath Holding ; Contrast Media - administration & dosage ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms - chemistry ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Prospective Study ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tumor Burden</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2015-04, Vol.21 (16), p.5017-5022</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-28225ade21a5647e7539edad3d9b43d6cf1fb561e520b7381b3bc8f43fab04e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-28225ade21a5647e7539edad3d9b43d6cf1fb561e520b7381b3bc8f43fab04e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408476/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408476/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sheng-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Cai-Zhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ren-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Meng-Su</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>To compare differences between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) using two-point Dixon fat-water separation (Dixon-VIBE) and chemically selective fat saturation (FS-VIBE) with magnetic resonance imaging examination.
Forty-nine patients were included, who were scanned with two VIBE sequences (Dixon-VIBE and FS-VIBE) in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration. Subjective evaluations including sharpness of tumor, sharpness of vessels, strength and homogeneity of fat suppression, and artifacts that were scored using a 4-point scale. The liver-to-lesion contrast was also calculated and compared.
Dixon-VIBE with water reconstruction had significantly higher subjective scores than FS-VIBE in strength and homogeneity of fat suppression (< 0.0001) but lower scores in sharpness of tumor (P < 0.0001), sharpness of vessels (P = 0.0001), and artifacts (P = 0.034). The liver-to-lesion contrast on Dixon-VIBE images was significantly lower than that on FS-VIBE (16.6% ± 9.4% vs 23.9% ± 12.1%, P = 0.0001).
Dixon-VIBE provides stronger and more homogenous fat suppression than FS-VIBE, while has lower clarity of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - chemistry</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - pathology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body Water</subject><subject>Breath Holding</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - chemistry</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prospective Study</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkbtPHDEQhy0EgoPQU0Uuafbi174apIhAEgmJJtSW1x7vGe3Zh-178N_HGwhKKkvze3hGH0JXlCx5K7ov--dxuWN06WizrAltj9CCMdpXrBPkGC0oIW3Vc9aeofOUnglhnNfsFJ2xuhezf4EOTwnsdvKQEg4W532oNsH5jL-5Q_DYqlztVYaIE2xUVNmVYQa98u5lC9h5PCoTDpCdxko7U4FfKa_B4MntSmqtRv9HjJCCnxXsysz58RM6sWpKcPn-XqCn-7tftz-qh8fvP2-_PlRaNCyXSxirlQFGVd2IFtqa92CU4aYfBDeNttQOdUOhZmRoeUcHPujOCm7VQARwfoFu3no322ENRoPPUU1yE8se8VUG5eT_incrOYadFIJ0om1KwfV7QQzl5pTl2iUN06Q8hG2StOkI7UgvZit5s-oYUopgP76hRM7AZAEmCzBZgMkZQIl8_ne9j8BfQvw3aK2W2A</recordid><startdate>20150428</startdate><enddate>20150428</enddate><creator>Ding, Ying</creator><creator>Rao, Sheng-Xiang</creator><creator>Chen, Cai-Zhong</creator><creator>Li, Ren-Chen</creator><creator>Zeng, Meng-Su</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150428</creationdate><title>Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Ding, Ying ; Rao, Sheng-Xiang ; Chen, Cai-Zhong ; Li, Ren-Chen ; Zeng, Meng-Su</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-28225ade21a5647e7539edad3d9b43d6cf1fb561e520b7381b3bc8f43fab04e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - chemistry</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - pathology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body Water</topic><topic>Breath Holding</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - chemistry</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prospective Study</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sheng-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Cai-Zhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ren-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Meng-Su</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Ying</au><au>Rao, Sheng-Xiang</au><au>Chen, Cai-Zhong</au><au>Li, Ren-Chen</au><au>Zeng, Meng-Su</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2015-04-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>5017</spage><epage>5022</epage><pages>5017-5022</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>To compare differences between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) using two-point Dixon fat-water separation (Dixon-VIBE) and chemically selective fat saturation (FS-VIBE) with magnetic resonance imaging examination.
Forty-nine patients were included, who were scanned with two VIBE sequences (Dixon-VIBE and FS-VIBE) in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration. Subjective evaluations including sharpness of tumor, sharpness of vessels, strength and homogeneity of fat suppression, and artifacts that were scored using a 4-point scale. The liver-to-lesion contrast was also calculated and compared.
Dixon-VIBE with water reconstruction had significantly higher subjective scores than FS-VIBE in strength and homogeneity of fat suppression (< 0.0001) but lower scores in sharpness of tumor (P < 0.0001), sharpness of vessels (P = 0.0001), and artifacts (P = 0.034). The liver-to-lesion contrast on Dixon-VIBE images was significantly lower than that on FS-VIBE (16.6% ± 9.4% vs 23.9% ± 12.1%, P = 0.0001).
Dixon-VIBE provides stronger and more homogenous fat suppression than FS-VIBE, while has lower clarity of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetic acid administration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>25945017</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1007-9327 |
ispartof | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2015-04, Vol.21 (16), p.5017-5022 |
issn | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4408476 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adipose Tissue - chemistry Adipose Tissue - pathology Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Body Water Breath Holding Contrast Media - administration & dosage Female Gadolinium DTPA - administration & dosage Humans Liver Neoplasms - chemistry Liver Neoplasms - pathology Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Prospective Study Reproducibility of Results Tumor Burden |
title | Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20two-point%20Dixon%20fat-water%20separation%20technique%20in%20gadoxetic%20acid-enhanced%20liver%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Ding,%20Ying&rft.date=2015-04-28&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=5017&rft.epage=5022&rft.pages=5017-5022&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1680180946%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-28225ade21a5647e7539edad3d9b43d6cf1fb561e520b7381b3bc8f43fab04e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680180946&rft_id=info:pmid/25945017&rfr_iscdi=true |