Implant Supported Distal Extension over Denture Retained by Two Types of Attachments. A Comparative Radiographic Study by Cone Beam Computed Tomography

This study was conducted to compare and evaluate the effect of two different attachments (locator attachment and ball and socket [B&S] attachment) on implants and natural abutments supporting structures, in cases of limited inter-arch spaces in mandibular Kennedy Class I implant supported remova...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international oral health 2015-05, Vol.7 (5), p.5-10
Main Authors: Mahrous, Ahmed I, Aldawash, Hussien A, Soliman, Tarek A, Banasr, Fahad H, Abdelwahed, Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dentures
Methods
Original Research
Prostheses
Teeth
Tomography
Transplants & implants
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study was conducted to compare and evaluate the effect of two different attachments (locator attachment and ball and socket [B&S] attachment) on implants and natural abutments supporting structures, in cases of limited inter-arch spaces in mandibular Kennedy Class I implant supported removable partial over dentures by measuring the bone height changes through the cone beam radiographic technology. Two implants were positioned in the first or second molar area following the two-stage surgical protocol. Two equal groups were divided ten for each: Group I: Sides were the placed implants restored by the locator attachment. Group II: The other sides, implants were restored by B&S attachment. Evaluation of the implants and main abutments supporting structures of each group was done at the time of removable partial over denture insertion, 6, 12 and 18 months by measuring the bone height changes using cone beam computed tomography. Implants with locator attachment showed marginal bone height better effects on implants and main abutments supporting structures. Implants restored by locator attachment shows better effects on bone of both main natural abutments and implant than those restored with ball and socket.
ISSN:0976-7428
0976-1799