Loading…

Potentiation of epidural lidocaine by co-administering tramadol by either intramuscular or epidural route in cats

This study investigated the analgesic and systemic effects of intramuscular (IM) versus epidural (EP) administration of tramadol as an adjunct to EP injection of lidocaine in cats. Six healthy, domestic, shorthair female cats underwent general anesthesia. A prospective, randomized, crossover trial w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of veterinary research 2015-07, Vol.79 (3), p.214-220
Main Authors: Hermeto, Larissa C., DeRossi, Rafael, Marques, Beatriz C., Jardim, Paulo H.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 220
container_issue 3
container_start_page 214
container_title Canadian journal of veterinary research
container_volume 79
creator Hermeto, Larissa C.
DeRossi, Rafael
Marques, Beatriz C.
Jardim, Paulo H.A.
description This study investigated the analgesic and systemic effects of intramuscular (IM) versus epidural (EP) administration of tramadol as an adjunct to EP injection of lidocaine in cats. Six healthy, domestic, shorthair female cats underwent general anesthesia. A prospective, randomized, crossover trial was then conducted with each cat receiving the following 3 treatments: EP injection of 2% lidocaine [LEP; 3.0 mg/kg body weight (BW)]; EP injection of a combination of lidocaine and 5% tramadol (LTEP; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively); or EP injection of lidocaine and IM injection of tramadol (LEPTIM; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively). Systemic effects, spread and duration of analgesia, behavior, and motor blockade were determined before treatment and at predetermined intervals afterwards. The duration of analgesia was 120 ± 31 min for LTEP, 71 ± 17 min for LEPTIM, and 53 ± 6 min for LEP (P < 0.05; mean ± SD). The cranial spread of analgesia obtained with LTEP was similar to that with LEP or LEPTIM, extending to dermatomic region T13-L1. Complete motor blockade was similar for the 3 treatments. It was concluded that tramadol produces similar side effects in cats after either EP or IM administration. Our findings indicate that EP and IM tramadol (2 mg/kg BW) with EP lidocaine produce satisfactory analgesia in cats. As an adjunct to lidocaine, EP tramadol provides a longer duration of analgesia than IM administration. The adverse effects produced by EP and IM administration of tramadol were not different. Further studies are needed to determine whether EP administration of tramadol could play a role in managing postoperative pain in cats when co-administered with lidocaine after painful surgical procedures.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubtec_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4445514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>cvma/cjvr/2015/00000079/00000003/art00008</ingid><sourcerecordid>cvma/cjvr/2015/00000079/00000003/art00008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g420t-3442624bdb6cf897f2a0fd1437b009bee1942b6e7a66689c53bcfdf2d0be25173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhrtQvBx9h7xAIU3StN0IIt5A1IWuh8mlxxza5JimB_TpTT2CuDCbzOQP3_zDf1Cc0JbTsqOUHhen07ShlDWS8aPimMmK07YWJ8X7c0jWJ4fJBU9CT-zWmTniQAZngkbnLVEfRIcSzei8m5KNzq9JijiiCcMiWpfebCTOL4_zpOcBIwnxFxXDnGzWicY0nRWHPQ6TPf-5V8XrzfXL1V358HR7f3X5UK4Fo6nkQjDJhDJK6r7tmp4h7U0leKMo7ZS1VSeYkrZBKWXb6Zor3ZueGaosq6uGr4qLPXc7q9EabRd7A2yjGzF-QEAHfxXv3mAddiCEqOs8aFVc7gF53_wFYRPm6LNl0LsRQW92ERitaqDfp-l-CsoBY1qKNjMe_2E4vccsGS0Rwa7pPM9AVuW-g2xAgrE9zkOChBHWnzC1_AvSupOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potentiation of epidural lidocaine by co-administering tramadol by either intramuscular or epidural route in cats</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Hermeto, Larissa C. ; DeRossi, Rafael ; Marques, Beatriz C. ; Jardim, Paulo H.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hermeto, Larissa C. ; DeRossi, Rafael ; Marques, Beatriz C. ; Jardim, Paulo H.A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the analgesic and systemic effects of intramuscular (IM) versus epidural (EP) administration of tramadol as an adjunct to EP injection of lidocaine in cats. Six healthy, domestic, shorthair female cats underwent general anesthesia. A prospective, randomized, crossover trial was then conducted with each cat receiving the following 3 treatments: EP injection of 2% lidocaine [LEP; 3.0 mg/kg body weight (BW)]; EP injection of a combination of lidocaine and 5% tramadol (LTEP; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively); or EP injection of lidocaine and IM injection of tramadol (LEPTIM; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively). Systemic effects, spread and duration of analgesia, behavior, and motor blockade were determined before treatment and at predetermined intervals afterwards. The duration of analgesia was 120 ± 31 min for LTEP, 71 ± 17 min for LEPTIM, and 53 ± 6 min for LEP (P &lt; 0.05; mean ± SD). The cranial spread of analgesia obtained with LTEP was similar to that with LEP or LEPTIM, extending to dermatomic region T13-L1. Complete motor blockade was similar for the 3 treatments. It was concluded that tramadol produces similar side effects in cats after either EP or IM administration. Our findings indicate that EP and IM tramadol (2 mg/kg BW) with EP lidocaine produce satisfactory analgesia in cats. As an adjunct to lidocaine, EP tramadol provides a longer duration of analgesia than IM administration. The adverse effects produced by EP and IM administration of tramadol were not different. Further studies are needed to determine whether EP administration of tramadol could play a role in managing postoperative pain in cats when co-administered with lidocaine after painful surgical procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0830-9000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26130854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</publisher><ispartof>Canadian journal of veterinary research, 2015-07, Vol.79 (3), p.214-220</ispartof><rights>Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445514/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445514/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hermeto, Larissa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRossi, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Beatriz C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardim, Paulo H.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Potentiation of epidural lidocaine by co-administering tramadol by either intramuscular or epidural route in cats</title><title>Canadian journal of veterinary research</title><description>This study investigated the analgesic and systemic effects of intramuscular (IM) versus epidural (EP) administration of tramadol as an adjunct to EP injection of lidocaine in cats. Six healthy, domestic, shorthair female cats underwent general anesthesia. A prospective, randomized, crossover trial was then conducted with each cat receiving the following 3 treatments: EP injection of 2% lidocaine [LEP; 3.0 mg/kg body weight (BW)]; EP injection of a combination of lidocaine and 5% tramadol (LTEP; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively); or EP injection of lidocaine and IM injection of tramadol (LEPTIM; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively). Systemic effects, spread and duration of analgesia, behavior, and motor blockade were determined before treatment and at predetermined intervals afterwards. The duration of analgesia was 120 ± 31 min for LTEP, 71 ± 17 min for LEPTIM, and 53 ± 6 min for LEP (P &lt; 0.05; mean ± SD). The cranial spread of analgesia obtained with LTEP was similar to that with LEP or LEPTIM, extending to dermatomic region T13-L1. Complete motor blockade was similar for the 3 treatments. It was concluded that tramadol produces similar side effects in cats after either EP or IM administration. Our findings indicate that EP and IM tramadol (2 mg/kg BW) with EP lidocaine produce satisfactory analgesia in cats. As an adjunct to lidocaine, EP tramadol provides a longer duration of analgesia than IM administration. The adverse effects produced by EP and IM administration of tramadol were not different. Further studies are needed to determine whether EP administration of tramadol could play a role in managing postoperative pain in cats when co-administered with lidocaine after painful surgical procedures.</description><issn>0830-9000</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhrtQvBx9h7xAIU3StN0IIt5A1IWuh8mlxxza5JimB_TpTT2CuDCbzOQP3_zDf1Cc0JbTsqOUHhen07ShlDWS8aPimMmK07YWJ8X7c0jWJ4fJBU9CT-zWmTniQAZngkbnLVEfRIcSzei8m5KNzq9JijiiCcMiWpfebCTOL4_zpOcBIwnxFxXDnGzWicY0nRWHPQ6TPf-5V8XrzfXL1V358HR7f3X5UK4Fo6nkQjDJhDJK6r7tmp4h7U0leKMo7ZS1VSeYkrZBKWXb6Zor3ZueGaosq6uGr4qLPXc7q9EabRd7A2yjGzF-QEAHfxXv3mAddiCEqOs8aFVc7gF53_wFYRPm6LNl0LsRQW92ERitaqDfp-l-CsoBY1qKNjMe_2E4vccsGS0Rwa7pPM9AVuW-g2xAgrE9zkOChBHWnzC1_AvSupOQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Hermeto, Larissa C.</creator><creator>DeRossi, Rafael</creator><creator>Marques, Beatriz C.</creator><creator>Jardim, Paulo H.A.</creator><general>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</general><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Potentiation of epidural lidocaine by co-administering tramadol by either intramuscular or epidural route in cats</title><author>Hermeto, Larissa C. ; DeRossi, Rafael ; Marques, Beatriz C. ; Jardim, Paulo H.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g420t-3442624bdb6cf897f2a0fd1437b009bee1942b6e7a66689c53bcfdf2d0be25173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hermeto, Larissa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRossi, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Beatriz C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardim, Paulo H.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of veterinary research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hermeto, Larissa C.</au><au>DeRossi, Rafael</au><au>Marques, Beatriz C.</au><au>Jardim, Paulo H.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potentiation of epidural lidocaine by co-administering tramadol by either intramuscular or epidural route in cats</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of veterinary research</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>214-220</pages><issn>0830-9000</issn><abstract>This study investigated the analgesic and systemic effects of intramuscular (IM) versus epidural (EP) administration of tramadol as an adjunct to EP injection of lidocaine in cats. Six healthy, domestic, shorthair female cats underwent general anesthesia. A prospective, randomized, crossover trial was then conducted with each cat receiving the following 3 treatments: EP injection of 2% lidocaine [LEP; 3.0 mg/kg body weight (BW)]; EP injection of a combination of lidocaine and 5% tramadol (LTEP; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively); or EP injection of lidocaine and IM injection of tramadol (LEPTIM; 3.0 and 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively). Systemic effects, spread and duration of analgesia, behavior, and motor blockade were determined before treatment and at predetermined intervals afterwards. The duration of analgesia was 120 ± 31 min for LTEP, 71 ± 17 min for LEPTIM, and 53 ± 6 min for LEP (P &lt; 0.05; mean ± SD). The cranial spread of analgesia obtained with LTEP was similar to that with LEP or LEPTIM, extending to dermatomic region T13-L1. Complete motor blockade was similar for the 3 treatments. It was concluded that tramadol produces similar side effects in cats after either EP or IM administration. Our findings indicate that EP and IM tramadol (2 mg/kg BW) with EP lidocaine produce satisfactory analgesia in cats. As an adjunct to lidocaine, EP tramadol provides a longer duration of analgesia than IM administration. The adverse effects produced by EP and IM administration of tramadol were not different. Further studies are needed to determine whether EP administration of tramadol could play a role in managing postoperative pain in cats when co-administered with lidocaine after painful surgical procedures.</abstract><pub>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</pub><pmid>26130854</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0830-9000
ispartof Canadian journal of veterinary research, 2015-07, Vol.79 (3), p.214-220
issn 0830-9000
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4445514
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
title Potentiation of epidural lidocaine by co-administering tramadol by either intramuscular or epidural route in cats
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A20%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potentiation%20of%20epidural%20lidocaine%20by%20co-administering%20tramadol%20by%20either%20intramuscular%20or%20epidural%20route%20in%20cats&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20veterinary%20research&rft.au=Hermeto,%20Larissa%20C.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=214-220&rft.issn=0830-9000&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec_pubme%3Ecvma/cjvr/2015/00000079/00000003/art00008%3C/pubtec_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g420t-3442624bdb6cf897f2a0fd1437b009bee1942b6e7a66689c53bcfdf2d0be25173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26130854&rft_ingid=cvma/cjvr/2015/00000079/00000003/art00008&rfr_iscdi=true