Loading…
Testing Taxon Tenacity of Tortoises: evidence for a geographical selection gradient at a secondary contact zone
We examined a secondary contact zone between two species of desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai. The taxa were isolated from a common ancestor during the formation of the Colorado River (4–8 mya) and are a classic example of allopatric speciation. However, an anomalous population of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and evolution 2015-05, Vol.5 (10), p.2095-2114 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5130-b1a55c592fed7d6aa4a12f6133f301dde845786875f4b76d513df7b56b50c3013 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5130-b1a55c592fed7d6aa4a12f6133f301dde845786875f4b76d513df7b56b50c3013 |
container_end_page | 2114 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2095 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Edwards, Taylor Berry, Kristin H. Inman, Richard D. Esque, Todd C. Nussear, Kenneth E. Jones, Cristina A. Culver, Melanie |
description | We examined a secondary contact zone between two species of desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai. The taxa were isolated from a common ancestor during the formation of the Colorado River (4–8 mya) and are a classic example of allopatric speciation. However, an anomalous population of G. agassizii comes into secondary contact with G. morafkai east of the Colorado River in the Black Mountains of Arizona and provides an opportunity to examine reinforcement of species' boundaries under natural conditions. We sampled 234 tortoises representing G. agassizii in California (n = 103), G. morafkai in Arizona (n = 78), and 53 individuals of undetermined assignment in the contact zone including and surrounding the Black Mountains. We genotyped individuals for 25 STR loci and determined maternal lineage using mtDNA sequence data. We performed multilocus genetic clustering analyses and used multiple statistical methods to detect levels of hybridization. We tested hypotheses about habitat use between G. agassizii and G. morafkai in the region where they co‐occur using habitat suitability models. Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai maintain independent taxonomic identities likely due to ecological niche partitioning, and the maintenance of the hybrid zone is best described by a geographical selection gradient model.
We present an empirical study on speciation and hybridization at a natural hybridization zone between two species of desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai) in northwestern Arizona. We utilize mtDNA and STR loci to assess hybridization and incorporate habitat suitability modeling to identify patterns of ecological niche partitioning. This research on the evolutionary history of these two tortoise species has strong conservation and management implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.1500 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4449762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1686420221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5130-b1a55c592fed7d6aa4a12f6133f301dde845786875f4b76d513df7b56b50c3013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rHCEUhqWkNCHNRf9AEXKTXmyijh8zuQiEZfsBgd5Mr8XR48YwqxudTbL99XW7aUgLFeHIOc95ffUg9IGSc0oIuwALzTkVhLxBR4xwMVNKtAevzofopJQ7UpckjBP1Dh0yWYud6I5Q6qFMIS5xb55SxD1EY8O0xcnjPuUphQLlEsNDcBAtYJ8yNngJaZnN-jZYM-ICI9gp1OaacwHihE3dNW9TdCZvcY2TsRP-mSK8R2-9GQucPMdj9OPzop9_nd18__Jtfn0zs4I2ZDZQI4QVHfPglJPGcEOZl7RpfEOoc9ByoVrZKuH5oKSrTc6rQchBEFuJ5hhd7XXXm2EFzlZb2Yx6ncOqWtLJBP13JYZbvUwPmnPeKcmqwNmzQE73m_pJehWKhXE0EdKmaCpbyRlhbHfX6T_oXdrkWJ-nGesIk7KhslKf9pTNqZQM_sUMJXo3Sb2bpN5NsrIfX7t_If_MrQIXe-AxjLD9v5JezBfNb8lf97SoZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290266316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing Taxon Tenacity of Tortoises: evidence for a geographical selection gradient at a secondary contact zone</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Edwards, Taylor ; Berry, Kristin H. ; Inman, Richard D. ; Esque, Todd C. ; Nussear, Kenneth E. ; Jones, Cristina A. ; Culver, Melanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Taylor ; Berry, Kristin H. ; Inman, Richard D. ; Esque, Todd C. ; Nussear, Kenneth E. ; Jones, Cristina A. ; Culver, Melanie</creatorcontrib><description>We examined a secondary contact zone between two species of desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai. The taxa were isolated from a common ancestor during the formation of the Colorado River (4–8 mya) and are a classic example of allopatric speciation. However, an anomalous population of G. agassizii comes into secondary contact with G. morafkai east of the Colorado River in the Black Mountains of Arizona and provides an opportunity to examine reinforcement of species' boundaries under natural conditions. We sampled 234 tortoises representing G. agassizii in California (n = 103), G. morafkai in Arizona (n = 78), and 53 individuals of undetermined assignment in the contact zone including and surrounding the Black Mountains. We genotyped individuals for 25 STR loci and determined maternal lineage using mtDNA sequence data. We performed multilocus genetic clustering analyses and used multiple statistical methods to detect levels of hybridization. We tested hypotheses about habitat use between G. agassizii and G. morafkai in the region where they co‐occur using habitat suitability models. Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai maintain independent taxonomic identities likely due to ecological niche partitioning, and the maintenance of the hybrid zone is best described by a geographical selection gradient model.
We present an empirical study on speciation and hybridization at a natural hybridization zone between two species of desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai) in northwestern Arizona. We utilize mtDNA and STR loci to assess hybridization and incorporate habitat suitability modeling to identify patterns of ecological niche partitioning. This research on the evolutionary history of these two tortoise species has strong conservation and management implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1500</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26045959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cline ; Clustering ; Desert animals ; Desert environments ; Deserts ; Ecological niches ; Genetic analysis ; Genotype & phenotype ; Gopherus ; Gopherus agassizii ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; hybrid zone ; Hybridization ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Mojave Desert ; Mountains ; Niche overlap ; Original Research ; Population ; Precipitation ; Rivers ; secondary contact ; Sonoran Desert ; Speciation ; Statistical methods ; Taxa ; Topography ; Tortoises ; Variables ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2015-05, Vol.5 (10), p.2095-2114</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5130-b1a55c592fed7d6aa4a12f6133f301dde845786875f4b76d513df7b56b50c3013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5130-b1a55c592fed7d6aa4a12f6133f301dde845786875f4b76d513df7b56b50c3013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290266316/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290266316?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11561,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,46051,46475,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26045959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Kristin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esque, Todd C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussear, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Cristina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culver, Melanie</creatorcontrib><title>Testing Taxon Tenacity of Tortoises: evidence for a geographical selection gradient at a secondary contact zone</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>We examined a secondary contact zone between two species of desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai. The taxa were isolated from a common ancestor during the formation of the Colorado River (4–8 mya) and are a classic example of allopatric speciation. However, an anomalous population of G. agassizii comes into secondary contact with G. morafkai east of the Colorado River in the Black Mountains of Arizona and provides an opportunity to examine reinforcement of species' boundaries under natural conditions. We sampled 234 tortoises representing G. agassizii in California (n = 103), G. morafkai in Arizona (n = 78), and 53 individuals of undetermined assignment in the contact zone including and surrounding the Black Mountains. We genotyped individuals for 25 STR loci and determined maternal lineage using mtDNA sequence data. We performed multilocus genetic clustering analyses and used multiple statistical methods to detect levels of hybridization. We tested hypotheses about habitat use between G. agassizii and G. morafkai in the region where they co‐occur using habitat suitability models. Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai maintain independent taxonomic identities likely due to ecological niche partitioning, and the maintenance of the hybrid zone is best described by a geographical selection gradient model.
We present an empirical study on speciation and hybridization at a natural hybridization zone between two species of desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai) in northwestern Arizona. We utilize mtDNA and STR loci to assess hybridization and incorporate habitat suitability modeling to identify patterns of ecological niche partitioning. This research on the evolutionary history of these two tortoise species has strong conservation and management implications.</description><subject>Cline</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Desert animals</subject><subject>Desert environments</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Gopherus</subject><subject>Gopherus agassizii</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>hybrid zone</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Mojave Desert</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Niche overlap</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>secondary contact</subject><subject>Sonoran Desert</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Tortoises</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rHCEUhqWkNCHNRf9AEXKTXmyijh8zuQiEZfsBgd5Mr8XR48YwqxudTbL99XW7aUgLFeHIOc95ffUg9IGSc0oIuwALzTkVhLxBR4xwMVNKtAevzofopJQ7UpckjBP1Dh0yWYud6I5Q6qFMIS5xb55SxD1EY8O0xcnjPuUphQLlEsNDcBAtYJ8yNngJaZnN-jZYM-ICI9gp1OaacwHihE3dNW9TdCZvcY2TsRP-mSK8R2-9GQucPMdj9OPzop9_nd18__Jtfn0zs4I2ZDZQI4QVHfPglJPGcEOZl7RpfEOoc9ByoVrZKuH5oKSrTc6rQchBEFuJ5hhd7XXXm2EFzlZb2Yx6ncOqWtLJBP13JYZbvUwPmnPeKcmqwNmzQE73m_pJehWKhXE0EdKmaCpbyRlhbHfX6T_oXdrkWJ-nGesIk7KhslKf9pTNqZQM_sUMJXo3Sb2bpN5NsrIfX7t_If_MrQIXe-AxjLD9v5JezBfNb8lf97SoZw</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Edwards, Taylor</creator><creator>Berry, Kristin H.</creator><creator>Inman, Richard D.</creator><creator>Esque, Todd C.</creator><creator>Nussear, Kenneth E.</creator><creator>Jones, Cristina A.</creator><creator>Culver, Melanie</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>BlackWell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Testing Taxon Tenacity of Tortoises: evidence for a geographical selection gradient at a secondary contact zone</title><author>Edwards, Taylor ; Berry, Kristin H. ; Inman, Richard D. ; Esque, Todd C. ; Nussear, Kenneth E. ; Jones, Cristina A. ; Culver, Melanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5130-b1a55c592fed7d6aa4a12f6133f301dde845786875f4b76d513df7b56b50c3013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cline</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Desert animals</topic><topic>Desert environments</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Gopherus</topic><topic>Gopherus agassizii</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>hybrid zone</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Mojave Desert</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Niche overlap</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>secondary contact</topic><topic>Sonoran Desert</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Tortoises</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Kristin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esque, Todd C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussear, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Cristina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culver, Melanie</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Taylor</au><au>Berry, Kristin H.</au><au>Inman, Richard D.</au><au>Esque, Todd C.</au><au>Nussear, Kenneth E.</au><au>Jones, Cristina A.</au><au>Culver, Melanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing Taxon Tenacity of Tortoises: evidence for a geographical selection gradient at a secondary contact zone</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2095</spage><epage>2114</epage><pages>2095-2114</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>We examined a secondary contact zone between two species of desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai. The taxa were isolated from a common ancestor during the formation of the Colorado River (4–8 mya) and are a classic example of allopatric speciation. However, an anomalous population of G. agassizii comes into secondary contact with G. morafkai east of the Colorado River in the Black Mountains of Arizona and provides an opportunity to examine reinforcement of species' boundaries under natural conditions. We sampled 234 tortoises representing G. agassizii in California (n = 103), G. morafkai in Arizona (n = 78), and 53 individuals of undetermined assignment in the contact zone including and surrounding the Black Mountains. We genotyped individuals for 25 STR loci and determined maternal lineage using mtDNA sequence data. We performed multilocus genetic clustering analyses and used multiple statistical methods to detect levels of hybridization. We tested hypotheses about habitat use between G. agassizii and G. morafkai in the region where they co‐occur using habitat suitability models. Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai maintain independent taxonomic identities likely due to ecological niche partitioning, and the maintenance of the hybrid zone is best described by a geographical selection gradient model.
We present an empirical study on speciation and hybridization at a natural hybridization zone between two species of desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai) in northwestern Arizona. We utilize mtDNA and STR loci to assess hybridization and incorporate habitat suitability modeling to identify patterns of ecological niche partitioning. This research on the evolutionary history of these two tortoise species has strong conservation and management implications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>26045959</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.1500</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2015-05, Vol.5 (10), p.2095-2114 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4449762 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cline Clustering Desert animals Desert environments Deserts Ecological niches Genetic analysis Genotype & phenotype Gopherus Gopherus agassizii Habitat utilization Habitats hybrid zone Hybridization Mitochondrial DNA Mojave Desert Mountains Niche overlap Original Research Population Precipitation Rivers secondary contact Sonoran Desert Speciation Statistical methods Taxa Topography Tortoises Variables Winter |
title | Testing Taxon Tenacity of Tortoises: evidence for a geographical selection gradient at a secondary contact zone |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A19%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20Taxon%20Tenacity%20of%20Tortoises:%20evidence%20for%20a%20geographical%20selection%20gradient%20at%20a%20secondary%20contact%20zone&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Edwards,%20Taylor&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2095&rft.epage=2114&rft.pages=2095-2114&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.1500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1686420221%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5130-b1a55c592fed7d6aa4a12f6133f301dde845786875f4b76d513df7b56b50c3013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290266316&rft_id=info:pmid/26045959&rfr_iscdi=true |