Loading…

The Effect of Channa striatus (Haruan) Extract on Pain and Wound Healing of Post-Lower Segment Caesarean Section Women

Channa striatus has been consumed for decades as a remedy to promote wound healing by women during postpartum period. The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, wound healing based on wound evaluation scale (WES), wound cosmetic appearance based on visual analogue scale (VAS) s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2015-01, Vol.2015 (2015), p.1-6
Main Authors: Abd Razak, Asrenee, Wan Yusoff, Wan Zahanim, Wan Mahmood, Wan Haslindawani, Norhayati, Mohd Noor, Baie, Saringat Hj, Yunus, Rohaizan, Omar, Julia, Nik Hussain, Nik Hazlina, Abdul Kadir, Azidah, Ab Wahab, Siti Zubaidah, Hassan, Intan Idiana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Channa striatus has been consumed for decades as a remedy to promote wound healing by women during postpartum period. The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, wound healing based on wound evaluation scale (WES), wound cosmetic appearance based on visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and patient satisfaction score (PSS), and safety profiles between C. striatus group and placebo group after six weeks of lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) delivery. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Subjects were randomised in a ratio of 1 : 1 into either the C. striatus group (500 mg daily) or placebo group (500 mg of maltodextrin daily). 76 subjects were successfully randomised, with 38 in the C. striatus group and 35 in the placebo group. There were no significant differences in postoperative pain p=0.814 and WES p=0.160 between the C. striatus and placebo groups. However, VAS and PSS in the C. striatus group were significantly better compared with the placebo group (p=0.014 and p
ISSN:1741-427X
1741-4288
DOI:10.1155/2015/849647