Meso level influences on long term condition self-management: stakeholder accounts of commonalities and differences across six European countries

• Published in: BMC public health 2015-07, Vol.15 (1), p.622-622, Article 622
• Main Authors: Rogers, Anne, Vassilev, Ivaylo, Pumar, Maria J Jesús, Todorova, Elka, Portillo, Mari Carmen, Foss, Christina, Koetsenruijter, Jan, Ratsika, Nikoleta, Serrano, Manuel, Knutsen, Ingrid A Ruud, Wensing, Michel, Roukova, Poli, Patelarou, Evridiki, Kennedy, Anne, Lionis, Christos
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - therapy; Europe; Health Policy; Healthcare Disparities; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Male; Motivation; Quality of Health Care - organization & administration; Self Care - methods; Self Care - psychology; Social Environment; Social Support
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1957-1

European countries are increasingly adopting systems of self -care support (SMS) for long term conditions which focus on enhancing individual, competencies, skills, behaviour and lifestyle changes. To date the focus of policy for engendering greater self- management in the population has been focused in the main on the actions and motivations of individuals. Less attention has been paid to how the broader influences relevant to SMS policy and practice such as those related to food production, distribution and consumption and the structural aspects and economics relating to physical exercise and governance of health care delivery systems might be implicated in the populations ability to self- manage. This study aimed to identify key informants operating with knowledge of both policy and practice related to SMS in order to explore how these influences are seen to impact on the self-management support environment for diabetes type 2. Ninety semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholder informants in Bulgaria, Spain, Greece, Norway, Netherlands and UK. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic and textual analysis. Stakeholders in the six countries identified a range of influences which shaped diabetes self-management (SM). The infrastructure and culture for supporting self- management practice is viewed as driven by political decision-makers, the socio-economic and policy environment, and the ethos and delivery of chronic illness management in formal health care systems. Three key themes emerged during the analysis of data. These were 1) social environmental influences on diabetes self-management 2) reluctance or inability of policy makers to regulate processes and environments related to chronic illness management 3) the focus of healthcare system governance and gaps in provision of self-management support (SMS). Nuances in the salience and content of these themes between partner countries related to the presence and articulation of dedicated prevention and self- management policies, behavioural interventions in primary care, drug company involvement and the impact of measures resulting from economic crises, and differences between countries with higher versus lower social welfare support and public spending on shaping illness management. The results suggest reasons for giving increasing prominence to meso level influences as a means of rebalancing and improving the effectiveness of implementing an agenda for SMS. There is a ne