Rural vs. non-rural differences and longitudinal bone changes by DXA and pQCT in men aged 20-66 years: A population-based study

• Published in: Bone (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2015-10, Vol.79, p.79-87
• Main Authors: Specker, Bonny L, Wey, Howard E, Binkley, Teresa L, Beare, Tianna M, Minett, Maggie, Weidauer, Lee
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Aged; Agriculture; Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging; Bone Density - physiology; Exercise - physiology; Humans; Life Style; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Rural Population; South Dakota; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Young Adult
• ISSN: 8756-3282; 1873-2763
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.045

Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine whether there were differences in estimated means and rates of change in BMC, bone area, BMD and measures of bone geometry among men (n = 544) from three distinct populations (Hutterite [rural], rural non-Hutterite, non-rural), and whether activity levels or calcium intake explain these population differences. Men were enrolled in the South Dakota Rural Bone Health Study and followed for 7.5 years to estimate means and rates of change in bone mass, density, size and geometry. Femoral neck (FN) and spine measurements were obtained every 18 months by DXA and distal radius (4% and 20%) measurements by pQCT. Activity measurements and calcium intake were obtained quarterly for the first 3 years and at 54, 72, and 90 months. Rural men had greater percent time in moderate plus vigorous activity (mean ± SD: 22 ± 10 vs. 15 ± 8%, p < 0.001) and greater lean mass (69 ± 9 vs. 66 ± 10 kg, p = 0.05) than non-rural men. Both rural populations (Hutterite and rural men) had larger femoral neck (FN) bone area and greater 20% radius cross-sectional area than non-rural men ([least square means ± SE] FN area: 5.90 ± 0.02 and 5.86 ± 0.02 vs. 5.76 ± 0.03 cm2 , p < 0.001 and p = 0.03 respectively and cross-sectional area: 171.0 ± 1.3 and 165.5 ± 1.5 vs. 150.3 ± 1.6 mm2 , both p < 0.001). Despite lower cortical vBMD in Hutterite and rural men compared to non-rural men (1182 ± 2 and 1187 ± 2 vs. 1192 ± 2 mm2 , p < 0.001 and p = 0.06 respectively), bone strength (pSSI) was greater (429 ± 5 and 422 ± 5 vs. 376 ± 6 mm3 , both p < 0.001). The rates of change in femoral neck BMC and aBMD and trabecular vBMD also differed by rural lifestyle, with greater losses among non-rural men in their 20s and 60s compared to both Hutterite and rural populations (time-by-age-by-group interactions, both p < 0.01). Physical activity was not found to be a potential mediator of population differences. Baseline calcium intake was associated with FN aBMD (p = 0.04), and increases in calcium intake were associated with spine BMC (p = 0.04) and inversely associated with cortical area (p = 0.02). There was some evidence for mediation by either baseline calcium intake or changes in calcium intake over the study period, but the influence on population differences were negligible. We speculate that rural–non-rural differences in bone occur earlier in life or are a result of factors that have not yet been identified.