Loading…

Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review

Background: The treatment of choice for acute ischaemic stroke is the intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 3-4.5 h of symptom onset. However, the use of a thrombolytic would be limited by its narrow therapeutic window and contraindications. As a result, in re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Interventional neurology 2014-01, Vol.3 (3-4), p.149-164
Main Authors: Puñal-Riobóo, Janet, Atienza, Gerardo, Blanco, Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f8e535360295b977c41459346af47a1bd3493d609eae6944250f30ab95c19cce3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f8e535360295b977c41459346af47a1bd3493d609eae6944250f30ab95c19cce3
container_end_page 164
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 149
container_title Interventional neurology
container_volume 3
creator Puñal-Riobóo, Janet
Atienza, Gerardo
Blanco, Miguel
description Background: The treatment of choice for acute ischaemic stroke is the intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 3-4.5 h of symptom onset. However, the use of a thrombolytic would be limited by its narrow therapeutic window and contraindications. As a result, in recent years, techniques such as mechanical thrombectomy have emerged, which employ thrombus retrieval devices, such as stent retrievers (Solitaire™, Trevo® or Revive™), whose safety and efficacy in the endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke is analysed in this article. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken until March 2015. The quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE methodology. A meta-analysis of the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed, and the weighted average for the case series' sample size was calculated (Review Manager v5.2 and SPSS v19). Results: Seventeen primary studies (2 RCTs, Solitaire™ and Trevo® vs. Merci®, and 15 case series) were selected. The RCT results show that stent retrievers have a safety profile similar to the Merci® device. However, both Solitaire™ and Trevo® achieved a higher recanalisation success rate (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.63-7.90; p < 0.00001) and appropriate clinical outcome at 90 days (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.52-4.25; p < 0.0004), although the 90-day mortality rate was similar in both groups (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.17-3.37; p = 0.70). Conclusions: Stent retrievers appear to be safe and effective devices, achieving high recanalisation rates and good clinical outcomes in the endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to the occlusion of intracranial arteries in comparison with the clot retriever Merci®.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000430474
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4521200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4521200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f8e535360295b977c41459346af47a1bd3493d609eae6944250f30ab95c19cce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtLKzEUgIMoKtWFexfZuqg3mTzGuBCKVK-gXLB1PZzJnLTRzowkaWX-hr_4RloKrs7rOx8HDiEXnF1zrswfxpgUTJbygJxyreVYKakOd7kpRXlCzmN8zxjTpmRSHpOTQhel0bo4Jd8zcJgGCl1Dp855C3agvaMvaJfQ5XJF58vQtzXa1LcDfYu-W9BZwi7RV0zB4wZDpL6jaYl02jX9BqJdryDQeUBI7Q-YfRO7TkifYrZi6202hP4Db-mEzoaYsIWUm6-48fh1Ro4crCKe7-KIvD1M5_d_x8__Hp_uJ89jK0yRxu4GlVBCs8Ko2pSllVwqI6QGJ0vgdSOkEY1mBgG1kbJQzAkGtVGWG2tRjMjd1vu5rltsbL40wKr6DL6FMFQ9-Or3pPPLatFvKqkKXjCWBVdbgQ19jAHdfpez6uc31f43mb3csh8QFhj25G78Hybtivc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Puñal-Riobóo, Janet ; Atienza, Gerardo ; Blanco, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Puñal-Riobóo, Janet ; Atienza, Gerardo ; Blanco, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The treatment of choice for acute ischaemic stroke is the intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 3-4.5 h of symptom onset. However, the use of a thrombolytic would be limited by its narrow therapeutic window and contraindications. As a result, in recent years, techniques such as mechanical thrombectomy have emerged, which employ thrombus retrieval devices, such as stent retrievers (Solitaire™, Trevo® or Revive™), whose safety and efficacy in the endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke is analysed in this article. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken until March 2015. The quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE methodology. A meta-analysis of the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed, and the weighted average for the case series' sample size was calculated (Review Manager v5.2 and SPSS v19). Results: Seventeen primary studies (2 RCTs, Solitaire™ and Trevo® vs. Merci®, and 15 case series) were selected. The RCT results show that stent retrievers have a safety profile similar to the Merci® device. However, both Solitaire™ and Trevo® achieved a higher recanalisation success rate (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.63-7.90; p &lt; 0.00001) and appropriate clinical outcome at 90 days (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.52-4.25; p &lt; 0.0004), although the 90-day mortality rate was similar in both groups (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.17-3.37; p = 0.70). Conclusions: Stent retrievers appear to be safe and effective devices, achieving high recanalisation rates and good clinical outcomes in the endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to the occlusion of intracranial arteries in comparison with the clot retriever Merci®.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-9737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-5545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000430474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26279662</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Review</subject><ispartof>Interventional neurology, 2014-01, Vol.3 (3-4), p.149-164</ispartof><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f8e535360295b977c41459346af47a1bd3493d609eae6944250f30ab95c19cce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f8e535360295b977c41459346af47a1bd3493d609eae6944250f30ab95c19cce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521200/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4521200/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puñal-Riobóo, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atienza, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review</title><title>Interventional neurology</title><addtitle>Intervent Neurol</addtitle><description>Background: The treatment of choice for acute ischaemic stroke is the intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 3-4.5 h of symptom onset. However, the use of a thrombolytic would be limited by its narrow therapeutic window and contraindications. As a result, in recent years, techniques such as mechanical thrombectomy have emerged, which employ thrombus retrieval devices, such as stent retrievers (Solitaire™, Trevo® or Revive™), whose safety and efficacy in the endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke is analysed in this article. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken until March 2015. The quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE methodology. A meta-analysis of the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed, and the weighted average for the case series' sample size was calculated (Review Manager v5.2 and SPSS v19). Results: Seventeen primary studies (2 RCTs, Solitaire™ and Trevo® vs. Merci®, and 15 case series) were selected. The RCT results show that stent retrievers have a safety profile similar to the Merci® device. However, both Solitaire™ and Trevo® achieved a higher recanalisation success rate (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.63-7.90; p &lt; 0.00001) and appropriate clinical outcome at 90 days (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.52-4.25; p &lt; 0.0004), although the 90-day mortality rate was similar in both groups (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.17-3.37; p = 0.70). Conclusions: Stent retrievers appear to be safe and effective devices, achieving high recanalisation rates and good clinical outcomes in the endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to the occlusion of intracranial arteries in comparison with the clot retriever Merci®.</description><subject>Review</subject><issn>1664-9737</issn><issn>1664-5545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtLKzEUgIMoKtWFexfZuqg3mTzGuBCKVK-gXLB1PZzJnLTRzowkaWX-hr_4RloKrs7rOx8HDiEXnF1zrswfxpgUTJbygJxyreVYKakOd7kpRXlCzmN8zxjTpmRSHpOTQhel0bo4Jd8zcJgGCl1Dp855C3agvaMvaJfQ5XJF58vQtzXa1LcDfYu-W9BZwi7RV0zB4wZDpL6jaYl02jX9BqJdryDQeUBI7Q-YfRO7TkifYrZi6202hP4Db-mEzoaYsIWUm6-48fh1Ro4crCKe7-KIvD1M5_d_x8__Hp_uJ89jK0yRxu4GlVBCs8Ko2pSllVwqI6QGJ0vgdSOkEY1mBgG1kbJQzAkGtVGWG2tRjMjd1vu5rltsbL40wKr6DL6FMFQ9-Or3pPPLatFvKqkKXjCWBVdbgQ19jAHdfpez6uc31f43mb3csh8QFhj25G78Hybtivc</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Puñal-Riobóo, Janet</creator><creator>Atienza, Gerardo</creator><creator>Blanco, Miguel</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review</title><author>Puñal-Riobóo, Janet ; Atienza, Gerardo ; Blanco, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f8e535360295b977c41459346af47a1bd3493d609eae6944250f30ab95c19cce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puñal-Riobóo, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atienza, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Interventional neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puñal-Riobóo, Janet</au><au>Atienza, Gerardo</au><au>Blanco, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Interventional neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Intervent Neurol</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>149-164</pages><issn>1664-9737</issn><eissn>1664-5545</eissn><abstract>Background: The treatment of choice for acute ischaemic stroke is the intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 3-4.5 h of symptom onset. However, the use of a thrombolytic would be limited by its narrow therapeutic window and contraindications. As a result, in recent years, techniques such as mechanical thrombectomy have emerged, which employ thrombus retrieval devices, such as stent retrievers (Solitaire™, Trevo® or Revive™), whose safety and efficacy in the endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke is analysed in this article. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken until March 2015. The quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE methodology. A meta-analysis of the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed, and the weighted average for the case series' sample size was calculated (Review Manager v5.2 and SPSS v19). Results: Seventeen primary studies (2 RCTs, Solitaire™ and Trevo® vs. Merci®, and 15 case series) were selected. The RCT results show that stent retrievers have a safety profile similar to the Merci® device. However, both Solitaire™ and Trevo® achieved a higher recanalisation success rate (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.63-7.90; p &lt; 0.00001) and appropriate clinical outcome at 90 days (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.52-4.25; p &lt; 0.0004), although the 90-day mortality rate was similar in both groups (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.17-3.37; p = 0.70). Conclusions: Stent retrievers appear to be safe and effective devices, achieving high recanalisation rates and good clinical outcomes in the endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to the occlusion of intracranial arteries in comparison with the clot retriever Merci®.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>26279662</pmid><doi>10.1159/000430474</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-9737
ispartof Interventional neurology, 2014-01, Vol.3 (3-4), p.149-164
issn 1664-9737
1664-5545
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4521200
source PubMed Central
subjects Review
title Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A07%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20Mechanical%20Thrombectomy%20Using%20Stent%20Retrievers%20in%20the%20Endovascular%20Treatment%20of%20Acute%20Ischaemic%20Stroke:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Interventional%20neurology&rft.au=Pu%C3%B1al-Riob%C3%B3o,%20Janet&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=149-164&rft.issn=1664-9737&rft.eissn=1664-5545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000430474&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_karge%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4521200%3C/pubmedcentral_karge%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f8e535360295b977c41459346af47a1bd3493d609eae6944250f30ab95c19cce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26279662&rfr_iscdi=true