What is the Best Clinical Test for Assessment of the Teres Minor in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears?

• Published in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2015-09, Vol.473 (9), p.2959-2966
• Main Authors: Collin, Philippe, Treseder, Thomas, Denard, Patrick J., Neyton, Lionel, Walch, Gilles, Lädermann, Alexandre
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthrography - methods; Biomechanical Phenomena; Clinical Research; Conservative Orthopedics; Female; Humans; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Orthopedics; Physical Examination - methods; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Range of Motion, Articular; Reproducibility of Results; Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging; Rotator Cuff - physiopathology; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging; Shoulder Joint - injuries; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology; Sports Medicine; Surgery; Surgical Orthopedics; Tendon Injuries - diagnosis; Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging; Tendon Injuries - physiopathology; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
• ISSN: 0009-921X; 1528-1132
• DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4392-9

Background Few studies define the clinical signs to evaluate the integrity of teres minor in patients with massive rotator cuff tears. CT and MRI, with or without an arthrogram, can be limited by image quality, soft tissue density, motion artifact, and interobserver reliability. Additionally, the ill-defined junction between the infraspinatus and teres minor and the larger muscle-to-tendon ratio of the teres minor can contribute to error. Therefore, we wished to determine the validity of clinical testing for teres minor tears. Question/Purposes The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of commonly used clinical signs (external rotation lag sign, drop sign, and the Patte test) for diagnosing the teres minor’s integrity. Methods We performed a prospective evaluation of patients referred to our shoulder clinic for massive rotator cuff tears determined by CT arthrograms. The posterosuperior rotator cuff was examined clinically and correlated with CT arthrograms. We assessed interobserver reliability for CT assessment and used three different clinical tests of teres minor function (the external rotation lag sign, drop sign, and the Patte test). One hundred patients with a mean age of 68 years were available for the analysis. Results The most accurate test for teres minor dysfunction was an external rotation lag sign greater than 40°, which had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 80%–100%) and a specificity of 92% (95% CI, 84%–96%). External rotation lag signs greater than 10° had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 80%–100%) and a specificity of 51% (95% CI, 40%–61%). The Patte sign had a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 70%–99%) and a specificity of 72% (95% CI, 61%–80%). The drop sign had a sensitivity of 87% (95% CI, 62%–96%) and a specificity of 88% (95% CI, 80%–93%). An external rotation lag sign greater than 40° was more specific than an external rotation lag sign greater than 10° (p