Loading…
The ABCs of DKA: Development and Validation of a Computer-Based Simulator and Scoring System
Background Clinical management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) continues to be suboptimal; simulation-based training may bridge this gap and is particularly applicable to teaching DKA management skills given it enables learning of basic knowledge, as well as clinical reasoning and patient management...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2015-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1319-1332 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Clinical management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) continues to be suboptimal; simulation-based training may bridge this gap and is particularly applicable to teaching DKA management skills given it enables learning of basic knowledge, as well as clinical reasoning and patient management skills.
Objectives
1) To develop, test, and refine a computer-based simulator of DKA management; 2) to collect validity evidence, according to National Standard’s validity framework; and 3) to judge whether the simulator scoring system is an appropriate measure of DKA management skills of undergraduate and postgraduate medical trainees.
Design
After developing the DKA simulator, we completed usability testing to optimize its functionality. We then conducted a preliminary validation of the scoring system for measuring trainees’ DKA management skills.
Participants
We recruited year 1 and year 3 medical students, year 2 postgraduate trainees, and endocrinologists (
n
= 75); each completed a simulator run, and we collected their simulator-computed scores.
Main Measures
We collected validity evidence related to content, internal structure, relations with other variables, and consequences.
Key Results
Our simulator consists of six cases highlighting DKA management priorities. Real-time progression of each case includes interactive order entry, laboratory and clinical data, and individualised feedback. Usability assessment identified issues with clarity of system status, user control, efficiency of use, and error prevention. Regarding validity evidence, Cronbach’s α was 0.795 for the seven subscales indicating favorable internal structure evidence. Participants’ scores showed a significant effect of training level (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11606-015-3273-y |