Comparison of two oxygen conserving nasal prong systems and the effects of nose and mouth breathing

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thorax 1986-10, Vol.41 (10), p.808-809
Main Authors: Gould, G A, Forsyth, I S, Flenley, D C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency and intensive respiratory care
Female
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mouth Breathing
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - instrumentation
Respiration
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3868-faab75b86f7eed0df009a8fbe18c0484070c374babdfce097aad7b21f48c0f703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3868-faab75b86f7eed0df009a8fbe18c0484070c374babdfce097aad7b21f48c0f703
container_end_page 809
container_issue 10
container_start_page 808
container_title Thorax
container_volume 41
creator Gould, G A
Forsyth, I S
Flenley, D C
description
doi_str_mv 10.1136/thx.41.10.808
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_460494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77188097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3868-faab75b86f7eed0df009a8fbe18c0484070c374babdfce097aad7b21f48c0f703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxS0EWroLR45IlkArLinjxo2dAwdU8SWtxAXOlu2Mm1SJXWxn2f73uLSqgAsne_x-b2asR8gLBkvG6uZt7h-WnC1LKUE-IgvGG1nVq7Z5TBYAHKqmFs1Tcp3SDgAkY-KKXNVCijXjC2I3YdrrOKTgaXA0_ww0PBy26KkNPmG8H_yWep30SPcxlHs6pIxTotp3NPdI0Tm0OR3NPiT8_T6FOffURNS5L_5n5InTY8Ln5_OGfP_44dvmc3X39dOXzfu7ytSy7Oy0NmJtZOMEYgedA2i1dAaZtMAlBwG2Ftxo0zmL0AqtO2FWzPGiOwH1DXl36rufzYSdRZ-jHtU-DpOOBxX0oP5W_NCrbbhXvAHe8uK_Pftj-DFjymoaksVx1B7DnJQQTMoyt4Cv_gF3YY6-_E2xAtVszVpWqOpE2RhSiugumzBQx-hUiU5xdixLdIV_-ef6F_qcVdFfn3WdrB5d1N4O6YKJFla8bQr25oSZafefib8AjuSxOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771315191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two oxygen conserving nasal prong systems and the effects of nose and mouth breathing</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gould, G A ; Forsyth, I S ; Flenley, D C</creator><creatorcontrib>Gould, G A ; Forsyth, I S ; Flenley, D C</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0040-6376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/thx.41.10.808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3787514</identifier><identifier>CODEN: THORA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Breathing ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - instrumentation ; Respiration</subject><ispartof>Thorax, 1986-10, Vol.41 (10), p.808-809</ispartof><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Oct 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3868-faab75b86f7eed0df009a8fbe18c0484070c374babdfce097aad7b21f48c0f703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3868-faab75b86f7eed0df009a8fbe18c0484070c374babdfce097aad7b21f48c0f703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC460494/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC460494/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7902496$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3787514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gould, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, I S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flenley, D C</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two oxygen conserving nasal prong systems and the effects of nose and mouth breathing</title><title>Thorax</title><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Breathing</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><issn>0040-6376</issn><issn>1468-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxS0EWroLR45IlkArLinjxo2dAwdU8SWtxAXOlu2Mm1SJXWxn2f73uLSqgAsne_x-b2asR8gLBkvG6uZt7h-WnC1LKUE-IgvGG1nVq7Z5TBYAHKqmFs1Tcp3SDgAkY-KKXNVCijXjC2I3YdrrOKTgaXA0_ww0PBy26KkNPmG8H_yWep30SPcxlHs6pIxTotp3NPdI0Tm0OR3NPiT8_T6FOffURNS5L_5n5InTY8Ln5_OGfP_44dvmc3X39dOXzfu7ytSy7Oy0NmJtZOMEYgedA2i1dAaZtMAlBwG2Ftxo0zmL0AqtO2FWzPGiOwH1DXl36rufzYSdRZ-jHtU-DpOOBxX0oP5W_NCrbbhXvAHe8uK_Pftj-DFjymoaksVx1B7DnJQQTMoyt4Cv_gF3YY6-_E2xAtVszVpWqOpE2RhSiugumzBQx-hUiU5xdixLdIV_-ef6F_qcVdFfn3WdrB5d1N4O6YKJFla8bQr25oSZafefib8AjuSxOw</recordid><startdate>19861001</startdate><enddate>19861001</enddate><creator>Gould, G A</creator><creator>Forsyth, I S</creator><creator>Flenley, D C</creator><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19861001</creationdate><title>Comparison of two oxygen conserving nasal prong systems and the effects of nose and mouth breathing</title><author>Gould, G A ; Forsyth, I S ; Flenley, D C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3868-faab75b86f7eed0df009a8fbe18c0484070c374babdfce097aad7b21f48c0f703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Breathing</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gould, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, I S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flenley, D C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gould, G A</au><au>Forsyth, I S</au><au>Flenley, D C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two oxygen conserving nasal prong systems and the effects of nose and mouth breathing</atitle><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><date>1986-10-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>808</spage><epage>809</epage><pages>808-809</pages><issn>0040-6376</issn><eissn>1468-3296</eissn><coden>THORA7</coden><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ</pub><pmid>3787514</pmid><doi>10.1136/thx.41.10.808</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-6376
ispartof Thorax, 1986-10, Vol.41 (10), p.808-809
issn 0040-6376
1468-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_460494
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency and intensive respiratory care
Female
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mouth Breathing
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - instrumentation
Respiration
title Comparison of two oxygen conserving nasal prong systems and the effects of nose and mouth breathing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20oxygen%20conserving%20nasal%20prong%20systems%20and%20the%20effects%20of%20nose%20and%20mouth%20breathing&rft.jtitle=Thorax&rft.au=Gould,%20G%20A&rft.date=1986-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=808&rft.epage=809&rft.pages=808-809&rft.issn=0040-6376&rft.eissn=1468-3296&rft.coden=THORA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/thx.41.10.808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E77188097%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3868-faab75b86f7eed0df009a8fbe18c0484070c374babdfce097aad7b21f48c0f703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771315191&rft_id=info:pmid/3787514&rfr_iscdi=true