Loading…
The effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review protocol
A significant proportion of women exceeds or does not meet the Institute of Medicine's gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. Inadequate, excessive GWG or weight loss during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of negative maternal and fetal outcomes. Among the many determinants of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Systematic reviews 2015-11, Vol.4 (1), p.145-145, Article 145 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3608e473ba53697d06736f3198a4dd007766f51617f62d27ace778aa735494143 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3608e473ba53697d06736f3198a4dd007766f51617f62d27ace778aa735494143 |
container_end_page | 145 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 145 |
container_title | Systematic reviews |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Manyanga, Taru da Silva, Danilo F Ferraro, Zachary M Harvey, Alysha L J Wilson, Shanna Ockenden, Holly N Adamo, Kristi B |
description | A significant proportion of women exceeds or does not meet the Institute of Medicine's gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. Inadequate, excessive GWG or weight loss during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of negative maternal and fetal outcomes. Among the many determinants of GWG identified in the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines, culture was named as one of the few whose influence has not been fully explored. Some cultural beliefs may erroneously promote overeating as "eating for two" and discourage physical activity during pregnancy, but there is lack of empirical evidence on how culture affects GWG. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the effects of culture on GWG.
Ten electronic databases will be searched to identify studies reporting on the effects of culture on GWG. Grey literature, published conference abstracts, websites of relevant organizations and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. Studies that report on effects of culture, acculturation, ethnicity, race, nationality, ancestry and identity on GWG in adult women will be included. Quality of evidence will be evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) approach to rating evidence. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements being resolved by consensus or third party adjudication as needed. Formal meta-analyses will be conducted among included studies that are sufficiently statistically and clinically homogeneous.
This review will provide a comprehensive assessment and synthesis of current evidence and will draw attention to potential gaps where future research on the effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain remains to be conducted.
PROSPERO CRD42015023399. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13643-015-0132-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4630828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1730026012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3608e473ba53697d06736f3198a4dd007766f51617f62d27ace778aa735494143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9LHTEQxUOpVFE_gC8l0Je-rJ38m-ztQ6FIawtCX_Q5xGT23sjezW2yq_jtG7lWbAMhQ-bMISc_xs4EnAvR46cqFGrVgTBtK9mJN-xIgsZOg1FvX9WH7LTWO2gLDQjAd-xQopHWKH3E4vWGOA0DhbnyPPCwjPNSiOeJr5cUaUwT8ZhqyCX6aeZrqrOfU578yB8orTftyqfpM_e8PtaZtq0ZeKH7RA98V_KcQx5P2MHgx0qnz-cxu_n-7friR3f16_LnxderLhjUc6cQetJW3XqjcGUjoFU4KLHqvY4RwFrEwQgUdkAZpfWBrO29t8rolRZaHbMve9_dcrulGGiaix_drqStL48u--T-7Uxp49b53mlU0Mu-GXx8Nij599Kium2LTuPoJ8pLdcIqAIkgZJN--E96l5fSvqU62XAoVBqgqcReFUqutdDw8hgB7gmj22N0DaN7wuhEm3n_OsXLxF9o6g-BUJgX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2132363400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review protocol</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Manyanga, Taru ; da Silva, Danilo F ; Ferraro, Zachary M ; Harvey, Alysha L J ; Wilson, Shanna ; Ockenden, Holly N ; Adamo, Kristi B</creator><creatorcontrib>Manyanga, Taru ; da Silva, Danilo F ; Ferraro, Zachary M ; Harvey, Alysha L J ; Wilson, Shanna ; Ockenden, Holly N ; Adamo, Kristi B</creatorcontrib><description>A significant proportion of women exceeds or does not meet the Institute of Medicine's gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. Inadequate, excessive GWG or weight loss during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of negative maternal and fetal outcomes. Among the many determinants of GWG identified in the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines, culture was named as one of the few whose influence has not been fully explored. Some cultural beliefs may erroneously promote overeating as "eating for two" and discourage physical activity during pregnancy, but there is lack of empirical evidence on how culture affects GWG. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the effects of culture on GWG.
Ten electronic databases will be searched to identify studies reporting on the effects of culture on GWG. Grey literature, published conference abstracts, websites of relevant organizations and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. Studies that report on effects of culture, acculturation, ethnicity, race, nationality, ancestry and identity on GWG in adult women will be included. Quality of evidence will be evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) approach to rating evidence. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements being resolved by consensus or third party adjudication as needed. Formal meta-analyses will be conducted among included studies that are sufficiently statistically and clinically homogeneous.
This review will provide a comprehensive assessment and synthesis of current evidence and will draw attention to potential gaps where future research on the effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain remains to be conducted.
PROSPERO CRD42015023399.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-4053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-4053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0132-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26527534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Asian Americans ; Body mass index ; Culture ; Evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Obesity ; Pregnancy ; Protocol ; Research Design ; Review Literature as Topic ; Systematic review ; Weight Gain - ethnology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Systematic reviews, 2015-11, Vol.4 (1), p.145-145, Article 145</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Manyanga et al. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3608e473ba53697d06736f3198a4dd007766f51617f62d27ace778aa735494143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3608e473ba53697d06736f3198a4dd007766f51617f62d27ace778aa735494143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630828/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2132363400?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26527534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manyanga, Taru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Danilo F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Zachary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, Alysha L J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ockenden, Holly N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamo, Kristi B</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review protocol</title><title>Systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Syst Rev</addtitle><description>A significant proportion of women exceeds or does not meet the Institute of Medicine's gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. Inadequate, excessive GWG or weight loss during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of negative maternal and fetal outcomes. Among the many determinants of GWG identified in the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines, culture was named as one of the few whose influence has not been fully explored. Some cultural beliefs may erroneously promote overeating as "eating for two" and discourage physical activity during pregnancy, but there is lack of empirical evidence on how culture affects GWG. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the effects of culture on GWG.
Ten electronic databases will be searched to identify studies reporting on the effects of culture on GWG. Grey literature, published conference abstracts, websites of relevant organizations and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. Studies that report on effects of culture, acculturation, ethnicity, race, nationality, ancestry and identity on GWG in adult women will be included. Quality of evidence will be evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) approach to rating evidence. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements being resolved by consensus or third party adjudication as needed. Formal meta-analyses will be conducted among included studies that are sufficiently statistically and clinically homogeneous.
This review will provide a comprehensive assessment and synthesis of current evidence and will draw attention to potential gaps where future research on the effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain remains to be conducted.
PROSPERO CRD42015023399.</description><subject>Asian Americans</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Review Literature as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Weight Gain - ethnology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2046-4053</issn><issn>2046-4053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9LHTEQxUOpVFE_gC8l0Je-rJ38m-ztQ6FIawtCX_Q5xGT23sjezW2yq_jtG7lWbAMhQ-bMISc_xs4EnAvR46cqFGrVgTBtK9mJN-xIgsZOg1FvX9WH7LTWO2gLDQjAd-xQopHWKH3E4vWGOA0DhbnyPPCwjPNSiOeJr5cUaUwT8ZhqyCX6aeZrqrOfU578yB8orTftyqfpM_e8PtaZtq0ZeKH7RA98V_KcQx5P2MHgx0qnz-cxu_n-7friR3f16_LnxderLhjUc6cQetJW3XqjcGUjoFU4KLHqvY4RwFrEwQgUdkAZpfWBrO29t8rolRZaHbMve9_dcrulGGiaix_drqStL48u--T-7Uxp49b53mlU0Mu-GXx8Nij599Kium2LTuPoJ8pLdcIqAIkgZJN--E96l5fSvqU62XAoVBqgqcReFUqutdDw8hgB7gmj22N0DaN7wuhEm3n_OsXLxF9o6g-BUJgX</recordid><startdate>20151103</startdate><enddate>20151103</enddate><creator>Manyanga, Taru</creator><creator>da Silva, Danilo F</creator><creator>Ferraro, Zachary M</creator><creator>Harvey, Alysha L J</creator><creator>Wilson, Shanna</creator><creator>Ockenden, Holly N</creator><creator>Adamo, Kristi B</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151103</creationdate><title>The effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review protocol</title><author>Manyanga, Taru ; da Silva, Danilo F ; Ferraro, Zachary M ; Harvey, Alysha L J ; Wilson, Shanna ; Ockenden, Holly N ; Adamo, Kristi B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3608e473ba53697d06736f3198a4dd007766f51617f62d27ace778aa735494143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Asian Americans</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Review Literature as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Weight Gain - ethnology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manyanga, Taru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Danilo F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Zachary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, Alysha L J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ockenden, Holly N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamo, Kristi B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manyanga, Taru</au><au>da Silva, Danilo F</au><au>Ferraro, Zachary M</au><au>Harvey, Alysha L J</au><au>Wilson, Shanna</au><au>Ockenden, Holly N</au><au>Adamo, Kristi B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review protocol</atitle><jtitle>Systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2015-11-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>145-145</pages><artnum>145</artnum><issn>2046-4053</issn><eissn>2046-4053</eissn><abstract>A significant proportion of women exceeds or does not meet the Institute of Medicine's gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. Inadequate, excessive GWG or weight loss during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of negative maternal and fetal outcomes. Among the many determinants of GWG identified in the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines, culture was named as one of the few whose influence has not been fully explored. Some cultural beliefs may erroneously promote overeating as "eating for two" and discourage physical activity during pregnancy, but there is lack of empirical evidence on how culture affects GWG. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the effects of culture on GWG.
Ten electronic databases will be searched to identify studies reporting on the effects of culture on GWG. Grey literature, published conference abstracts, websites of relevant organizations and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. Studies that report on effects of culture, acculturation, ethnicity, race, nationality, ancestry and identity on GWG in adult women will be included. Quality of evidence will be evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) approach to rating evidence. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements being resolved by consensus or third party adjudication as needed. Formal meta-analyses will be conducted among included studies that are sufficiently statistically and clinically homogeneous.
This review will provide a comprehensive assessment and synthesis of current evidence and will draw attention to potential gaps where future research on the effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain remains to be conducted.
PROSPERO CRD42015023399.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>26527534</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13643-015-0132-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-4053 |
ispartof | Systematic reviews, 2015-11, Vol.4 (1), p.145-145, Article 145 |
issn | 2046-4053 2046-4053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4630828 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Asian Americans Body mass index Culture Evidence-based medicine Female Guidelines as Topic Humans Obesity Pregnancy Protocol Research Design Review Literature as Topic Systematic review Weight Gain - ethnology Womens health |
title | The effects of culture on guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review protocol |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20culture%20on%20guideline%20discordant%20gestational%20weight%20gain:%20a%20systematic%20review%20protocol&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Manyanga,%20Taru&rft.date=2015-11-03&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=145-145&rft.artnum=145&rft.issn=2046-4053&rft.eissn=2046-4053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13643-015-0132-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1730026012%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3608e473ba53697d06736f3198a4dd007766f51617f62d27ace778aa735494143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132363400&rft_id=info:pmid/26527534&rfr_iscdi=true |