Loading…

The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships

Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2015-10, Vol.282 (1817), p.20151348-20151348
Main Authors: Duncan, Clare, Thompson, Julian R., Pettorelli, Nathalie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13
container_end_page 20151348
container_issue 1817
container_start_page 20151348
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 282
creator Duncan, Clare
Thompson, Julian R.
Pettorelli, Nathalie
description Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2015.1348
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4633867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1722925393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCliXKkk0G_8Q_2SBBBQWpEgjKDsnyODcdlyQefJORwop34A15EjydoaJCwMry9ed7zr2HkEeMLhmtzdOEm9WSUyaXTFTmDlmwSrOS17K6Sxa0Vrw0leRH5BjxilJaSyPvkyOuKmV4RRfk08Uaii8T4Fi0MRWu6MGv3RBwDL6YhgYSjm5ownBZxLZYhdiEba6Fcf7x7Tv4iDOO0BcIaRs8YJGgc2OIA67DBh-Qe63rEB4ezhPy8dXLi9PX5fnbszenz89Lr4QYS1CKASjOfSVp2wjqlBFcido5ybgW0oFydaXbXKYZVhoax7R0Qq-ANUyckGf7vptp1UPjYRiT6-wmhd6l2UYX7O2XIaztZdzaKusbpXODJ4cGKV4vw_YBPXSdGyBOaJmhRklDpfw_qjmvuRS1yOhyj_oUERO0N44Ytbv07C49u0vP7tLLHx7_PscN_iuuDHzeAynOeaHRBxhnexWnNOSrff_h3YstNzwww7SlRrDsWHJtv4bNQctwGxAnsNfIbf0_7Yh_qf1liJ_uhc3B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722925393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Duncan, Clare ; Thompson, Julian R. ; Pettorelli, Nathalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare ; Thompson, Julian R. ; Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1348</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26468240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecology - methods ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem Function ; Ecosystem Services ; Mechanisms ; Proxies ; Review ; Review Articles</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-10, Vol.282 (1817), p.20151348-20151348</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors.</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633867/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633867/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Julian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><title>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecology - methods</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem Function</subject><subject>Ecosystem Services</subject><subject>Mechanisms</subject><subject>Proxies</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Articles</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCliXKkk0G_8Q_2SBBBQWpEgjKDsnyODcdlyQefJORwop34A15EjydoaJCwMry9ed7zr2HkEeMLhmtzdOEm9WSUyaXTFTmDlmwSrOS17K6Sxa0Vrw0leRH5BjxilJaSyPvkyOuKmV4RRfk08Uaii8T4Fi0MRWu6MGv3RBwDL6YhgYSjm5ownBZxLZYhdiEba6Fcf7x7Tv4iDOO0BcIaRs8YJGgc2OIA67DBh-Qe63rEB4ezhPy8dXLi9PX5fnbszenz89Lr4QYS1CKASjOfSVp2wjqlBFcido5ybgW0oFydaXbXKYZVhoax7R0Qq-ANUyckGf7vptp1UPjYRiT6-wmhd6l2UYX7O2XIaztZdzaKusbpXODJ4cGKV4vw_YBPXSdGyBOaJmhRklDpfw_qjmvuRS1yOhyj_oUERO0N44Ytbv07C49u0vP7tLLHx7_PscN_iuuDHzeAynOeaHRBxhnexWnNOSrff_h3YstNzwww7SlRrDsWHJtv4bNQctwGxAnsNfIbf0_7Yh_qf1liJ_uhc3B</recordid><startdate>20151022</startdate><enddate>20151022</enddate><creator>Duncan, Clare</creator><creator>Thompson, Julian R.</creator><creator>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151022</creationdate><title>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</title><author>Duncan, Clare ; Thompson, Julian R. ; Pettorelli, Nathalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecology - methods</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem Function</topic><topic>Ecosystem Services</topic><topic>Mechanisms</topic><topic>Proxies</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Julian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duncan, Clare</au><au>Thompson, Julian R.</au><au>Pettorelli, Nathalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2015-10-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>282</volume><issue>1817</issue><spage>20151348</spage><epage>20151348</epage><pages>20151348-20151348</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>26468240</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2015.1348</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-10, Vol.282 (1817), p.20151348-20151348
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4633867
source PubMed Central Free; JSTOR; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Biodiversity
Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecology - methods
Ecosystem
Ecosystem Function
Ecosystem Services
Mechanisms
Proxies
Review
Review Articles
title The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20quest%20for%20a%20mechanistic%20understanding%20of%20biodiversity%E2%80%93ecosystem%20services%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Duncan,%20Clare&rft.date=2015-10-22&rft.volume=282&rft.issue=1817&rft.spage=20151348&rft.epage=20151348&rft.pages=20151348-20151348&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.1348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1722925393%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722925393&rft_id=info:pmid/26468240&rfr_iscdi=true