Loading…
The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships
Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2015-10, Vol.282 (1817), p.20151348-20151348 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13 |
container_end_page | 20151348 |
container_issue | 1817 |
container_start_page | 20151348 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 282 |
creator | Duncan, Clare Thompson, Julian R. Pettorelli, Nathalie |
description | Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2015.1348 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4633867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1722925393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCliXKkk0G_8Q_2SBBBQWpEgjKDsnyODcdlyQefJORwop34A15EjydoaJCwMry9ed7zr2HkEeMLhmtzdOEm9WSUyaXTFTmDlmwSrOS17K6Sxa0Vrw0leRH5BjxilJaSyPvkyOuKmV4RRfk08Uaii8T4Fi0MRWu6MGv3RBwDL6YhgYSjm5ownBZxLZYhdiEba6Fcf7x7Tv4iDOO0BcIaRs8YJGgc2OIA67DBh-Qe63rEB4ezhPy8dXLi9PX5fnbszenz89Lr4QYS1CKASjOfSVp2wjqlBFcido5ybgW0oFydaXbXKYZVhoax7R0Qq-ANUyckGf7vptp1UPjYRiT6-wmhd6l2UYX7O2XIaztZdzaKusbpXODJ4cGKV4vw_YBPXSdGyBOaJmhRklDpfw_qjmvuRS1yOhyj_oUERO0N44Ytbv07C49u0vP7tLLHx7_PscN_iuuDHzeAynOeaHRBxhnexWnNOSrff_h3YstNzwww7SlRrDsWHJtv4bNQctwGxAnsNfIbf0_7Yh_qf1liJ_uhc3B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722925393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Duncan, Clare ; Thompson, Julian R. ; Pettorelli, Nathalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare ; Thompson, Julian R. ; Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1348</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26468240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecology - methods ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem Function ; Ecosystem Services ; Mechanisms ; Proxies ; Review ; Review Articles</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-10, Vol.282 (1817), p.20151348-20151348</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors.</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633867/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4633867/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Julian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><title>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecology - methods</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem Function</subject><subject>Ecosystem Services</subject><subject>Mechanisms</subject><subject>Proxies</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Articles</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCliXKkk0G_8Q_2SBBBQWpEgjKDsnyODcdlyQefJORwop34A15EjydoaJCwMry9ed7zr2HkEeMLhmtzdOEm9WSUyaXTFTmDlmwSrOS17K6Sxa0Vrw0leRH5BjxilJaSyPvkyOuKmV4RRfk08Uaii8T4Fi0MRWu6MGv3RBwDL6YhgYSjm5ownBZxLZYhdiEba6Fcf7x7Tv4iDOO0BcIaRs8YJGgc2OIA67DBh-Qe63rEB4ezhPy8dXLi9PX5fnbszenz89Lr4QYS1CKASjOfSVp2wjqlBFcido5ybgW0oFydaXbXKYZVhoax7R0Qq-ANUyckGf7vptp1UPjYRiT6-wmhd6l2UYX7O2XIaztZdzaKusbpXODJ4cGKV4vw_YBPXSdGyBOaJmhRklDpfw_qjmvuRS1yOhyj_oUERO0N44Ytbv07C49u0vP7tLLHx7_PscN_iuuDHzeAynOeaHRBxhnexWnNOSrff_h3YstNzwww7SlRrDsWHJtv4bNQctwGxAnsNfIbf0_7Yh_qf1liJ_uhc3B</recordid><startdate>20151022</startdate><enddate>20151022</enddate><creator>Duncan, Clare</creator><creator>Thompson, Julian R.</creator><creator>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151022</creationdate><title>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</title><author>Duncan, Clare ; Thompson, Julian R. ; Pettorelli, Nathalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecology - methods</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem Function</topic><topic>Ecosystem Services</topic><topic>Mechanisms</topic><topic>Proxies</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Julian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettorelli, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duncan, Clare</au><au>Thompson, Julian R.</au><au>Pettorelli, Nathalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2015-10-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>282</volume><issue>1817</issue><spage>20151348</spage><epage>20151348</epage><pages>20151348-20151348</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Ecosystem services (ES) approaches to biodiversity conservation are currently high on the ecological research and policy agendas. However, despite a wealth of studies into biodiversity's role in maintaining ES (B–ES relationships) across landscapes, we still lack generalities in the nature and strengths of these linkages. Reasons for this are manifold, but can largely be attributed to (i) a lack of adherence to definitions and thus a confusion between final ES and the ecosystem functions (EFs) underpinning them, (ii) a focus on uninformative biodiversity indices and singular hypotheses and (iii) top-down analyses across large spatial scales and overlooking of context-dependency. The biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (B–EF) field provides an alternate context for examining biodiversity's mechanistic role in shaping ES, focusing on species' characteristics that may drive EFs via multiple mechanisms across contexts. Despite acknowledgements of a need for B–ES research to look towards underlying B–EF linkages, the connections between these areas of research remains weak. With this review, we pull together recent B–EF findings to identify key areas for future developments in B–ES research. We highlight a means by which B–ES research may begin to identify how and when multiple underlying B–EF relationships may scale to final ES delivery and trade-offs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>26468240</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2015.1348</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2015-10, Vol.282 (1817), p.20151348-20151348 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4633867 |
source | PubMed Central Free; JSTOR; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Biodiversity Biodiversity–ecosystem Services Relationships Conservation of Natural Resources Ecology - methods Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Services Mechanisms Proxies Review Review Articles |
title | The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20quest%20for%20a%20mechanistic%20understanding%20of%20biodiversity%E2%80%93ecosystem%20services%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Duncan,%20Clare&rft.date=2015-10-22&rft.volume=282&rft.issue=1817&rft.spage=20151348&rft.epage=20151348&rft.pages=20151348-20151348&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.1348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1722925393%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-e661ee622c450fd30a6832639aa512735ae6a947f6830e6667eda175a37be1d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722925393&rft_id=info:pmid/26468240&rfr_iscdi=true |