Behavioral and Psychosocial Effects of Two Middle School Sexual Health Education Programs at Tenth-Grade Follow-Up

• Published in: Journal of adolescent health 2014-02, Vol.54 (2), p.151-159
• Main Authors: Markham, Christine M., Ph.D, Peskin, Melissa F., Ph.D, Shegog, Ross, Ph.D, Baumler, Elizabeth R., Ph.D, Addy, Robert C., Ph.D, Thiel, Melanie, M.P.H, Escobar-Chaves, Soledad Liliana, Dr.P.H, Robin, Leah, Ph.D, Tortolero, Susan R., Ph.D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adolescents; Anal intercourse; Avoidance; Biological and medical sciences; Coitus; Computer-based; Condoms; Condoms - utilization; Data Collection; Delayed; Educational Programs; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health education; High Schools; Hispanic Americans; Humans; Initiation; Intervention studies; Junior High Schools; Male; Medical Research; Medical sciences; Mental health; Middle schools; Pediatrics; Prevention. Health policy. Planification; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Psychosocial factors; Risk; Safe sexual practices; Sex Education - methods; Sexual Abstinence; Sexual behavior; Sexual Behavior - ethnology; Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry; Socioeconomic Factors; Students; United States; Urban populations
• ISSN: 1054-139X; 1879-1972
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.204

Abstract Purpose An earlier randomized controlled trial found that two middle school sexual education programs—a risk avoidance (RA) program and a risk reduction (RR) program—delayed initiation of sexual intercourse (oral, vaginal, or anal sex) and reduced other sexual risk behaviors in ninth grade. We examined whether these effects extended into 10th grade. Methods Fifteen middle schools were randomly assigned to RA, RR, or control conditions. Follow-up surveys were conducted with participating students in 10th grade (n = 1,187; 29.2% attrition). Results Participants were 60% female, 50% Hispanic, and 39% black; seventh grade mean age was 12.6 years. In 10th grade, compared with the control condition, both programs significantly delayed anal sex initiation in the total sample (RA: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], .64, 95% confidence interval [CI], .42–.99; RR: AOR, .65, 95% CI, .50–.84) and among Hispanics (RA: AOR, .53, 95% CI, .31–.91; RR: AOR, .82, 95% CI, .74–.93). Risk avoidance students were less likely to report unprotected vaginal sex, either by using a condom or by abstaining from sex (AOR: .61, 95% CI, .45–.85); RR students were less likely to report recent unprotected anal sex (AOR: .34, 95% CI, .20–.56). Both programs sustained positive impact on some psychosocial outcomes. Conclusions Although both programs delayed anal sex initiation into 10th grade, effects on the delayed initiation of oral and vaginal sex were not sustained. Additional high school sexual education may help to further delay sexual initiation and reduce other sexual risk behaviors in later high school years.