Loading…
Changes of tumor microcirculation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: First pass perfusion MR imaging and Chinese ink casting in a rabbit model
AIM: To observe the change of tumor microcirculation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with bletilla microspheres by using first pass perfusion MR imaging (FP) and Chinese ink casting.METHODS: VX2 carcinoma cells were surgically implanted into the left and right lobes of liver of...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2004-05, Vol.10 (10), p.1415-1420 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | AIM: To observe the change of tumor microcirculation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with bletilla microspheres by using first pass perfusion MR imaging (FP) and Chinese ink casting.METHODS: VX2 carcinoma cells were surgically implanted into the left and right lobes of liver of 30 New Zealand white rabbits, which were divided into 3 groups at random. Emulsion of lipiodol mixed with mitomydn C, and 5-FU bletilla microspheres were injected into the hepatic artery respectively, and saline was used as control agent. MR imaging was performed with turbo-flash sequence 14 d after tumor implantation and 7 d after interventional therapy. The steepest slopes (SS) of the signal intensity versus time curves were created for quantitative analysis, 7.5% Chinese ink gelatin solution was injected through ascending artery (17 cases) or portal vein(2 cases) for lesion microvessel area (MVA) measurement after the last MRI examination.The correlation between perfusion imaging and MVA was studied blindly.RESULTS: The SS values at the rim of tumor in lipiodol group (mean, 49% per second) and bletilla group (mean,35% per second) were significantly decreased (P0.05). In lipiodol group, the MVAs (24 974±11 836μm^2) in the center of the tumor were significantly smaller than those of the control group (35 510±15 675 μm^2) (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
DOI: | 10.3748/wjg.v10.i10.1415 |