Loading…

Aging in personal and social immunity: do immune traits senesce at the same rate?

Summary How much should an individual invest in immunity as it grows older? Immunity is costly and its value is likely to change across an organism's lifespan. A limited number of studies have focused on how personal immune investment changes with age in insects, but we do not know how social i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and evolution 2015-10, Vol.5 (19), p.4365-4375
Main Authors: Reavey, Catherine E., Warnock, Neil D., Garbett, Amy P., Cotter, Sheena C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5468-1d0a4098c2ec432b0a17f2f9464f4c82d98d86e0e9c61284b1624621f13aef163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5468-1d0a4098c2ec432b0a17f2f9464f4c82d98d86e0e9c61284b1624621f13aef163
container_end_page 4375
container_issue 19
container_start_page 4365
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 5
creator Reavey, Catherine E.
Warnock, Neil D.
Garbett, Amy P.
Cotter, Sheena C.
description Summary How much should an individual invest in immunity as it grows older? Immunity is costly and its value is likely to change across an organism's lifespan. A limited number of studies have focused on how personal immune investment changes with age in insects, but we do not know how social immunity, immune responses that protect kin, changes across lifespan, or how resources are divided between these two arms of the immune response. In this study, both personal and social immune functions are considered in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. We show that personal immune function declines (phenoloxidase levels) or is maintained (defensin expression) across lifespan in nonbreeding beetles but is maintained (phenoloxidase levels) or even upregulated (defensin expression) in breeding individuals. In contrast, social immunity increases in breeding burying beetles up to middle age, before decreasing in old age. Social immunity is not affected by a wounding challenge across lifespan, whereas personal immunity, through PO, is upregulated following wounding to a similar extent across lifespan. Personal immune function may be prioritized in younger individuals in order to ensure survival until reproductive maturity. If not breeding, this may then drop off in later life as state declines. As burying beetles are ephemeral breeders, breeding opportunities in later life may be rare. When allowed to breed, beetles may therefore invest heavily in “staying alive” in order to complete what could potentially be their final reproductive opportunity. As parental care is important for the survival and growth of offspring in this genus, staying alive to provide care behaviors will clearly have fitness payoffs. This study shows that all immune traits do not senesce at the same rate. In fact, the patterns observed depend upon the immune traits measured and the breeding status of the individual. Multiple immune responses have evolved to protect the individual (personal) or their kin (social). Several studies have considered how personal immunity changes with age, but this is the first study to consider how social immunity changes with age. We found that in virgins, personal immunity declined or was maintained with age, while in breeders, it was maintained or even increased with age. Social immunity increased to middle age before falling in old age. We discuss the potential reasons for these differing responses to aging.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.1668
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4667822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289674043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5468-1d0a4098c2ec432b0a17f2f9464f4c82d98d86e0e9c61284b1624621f13aef163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFLHDEUx0OpVLEe-gVKoJd6WE0y2ZeMB0WWVQuCCO05ZDNv1shMsiYzLfvtzXZVbEEwl7yQH7-8lz8hXzg74oyJY3RYHXEA_YHsCSanE6Wm-uOrepcc5HzPygImJFOfyK4AAAl6ukduz5c-LKkPdIUpx2A7akNDc3S-lL7vx-CH9Qlt4vaAdEjWD5lmDJgdUjvQ4Q5ptj3SZAc8-0x2WttlPHja98mvi_nP2dXk-ubyx-z8euKm5ekJb5iVrNZOoJOVWDDLVSvaWoJspdOiqXWjARnWDrjQcsFBSBC85ZXFlkO1T0633tW46LFxGEpnnVkl39u0NtF68-9N8HdmGX8bCaC0EEXw_UmQ4sOIeTC9LxN1nQ0Yx2y4kjWwWin1DlQoUFKyqqDf_kPv45jKv2YjhK4LxeSGOtxSLsWcE7YvfXNmNrGaTaxmE2thv74e9IV8DrEAx1vgj-9w_bbJzGfz6q_yEWdYqko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289674043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aging in personal and social immunity: do immune traits senesce at the same rate?</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Reavey, Catherine E. ; Warnock, Neil D. ; Garbett, Amy P. ; Cotter, Sheena C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reavey, Catherine E. ; Warnock, Neil D. ; Garbett, Amy P. ; Cotter, Sheena C.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary How much should an individual invest in immunity as it grows older? Immunity is costly and its value is likely to change across an organism's lifespan. A limited number of studies have focused on how personal immune investment changes with age in insects, but we do not know how social immunity, immune responses that protect kin, changes across lifespan, or how resources are divided between these two arms of the immune response. In this study, both personal and social immune functions are considered in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. We show that personal immune function declines (phenoloxidase levels) or is maintained (defensin expression) across lifespan in nonbreeding beetles but is maintained (phenoloxidase levels) or even upregulated (defensin expression) in breeding individuals. In contrast, social immunity increases in breeding burying beetles up to middle age, before decreasing in old age. Social immunity is not affected by a wounding challenge across lifespan, whereas personal immunity, through PO, is upregulated following wounding to a similar extent across lifespan. Personal immune function may be prioritized in younger individuals in order to ensure survival until reproductive maturity. If not breeding, this may then drop off in later life as state declines. As burying beetles are ephemeral breeders, breeding opportunities in later life may be rare. When allowed to breed, beetles may therefore invest heavily in “staying alive” in order to complete what could potentially be their final reproductive opportunity. As parental care is important for the survival and growth of offspring in this genus, staying alive to provide care behaviors will clearly have fitness payoffs. This study shows that all immune traits do not senesce at the same rate. In fact, the patterns observed depend upon the immune traits measured and the breeding status of the individual. Multiple immune responses have evolved to protect the individual (personal) or their kin (social). Several studies have considered how personal immunity changes with age, but this is the first study to consider how social immunity changes with age. We found that in virgins, personal immunity declined or was maintained with age, while in breeders, it was maintained or even increased with age. Social immunity increased to middle age before falling in old age. We discuss the potential reasons for these differing responses to aging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26664685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Aging ; Animal breeding ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bees ; Beetles ; Breeding ; Breeding status ; Coleoptera ; defensin ; ecological immunology ; Fitness ; Genes ; Immune response ; Immune system ; Immunity ; insect ; Insects ; Investment policy ; Life span ; lifespan ; lysozyme ; Mortality ; Nicrophorus ; Offspring ; Original Research ; parental care ; Phenoloxidase ; Physiology ; Senescence ; Studies ; Survival ; Wounding</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2015-10, Vol.5 (19), p.4365-4375</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5468-1d0a4098c2ec432b0a17f2f9464f4c82d98d86e0e9c61284b1624621f13aef163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5468-1d0a4098c2ec432b0a17f2f9464f4c82d98d86e0e9c61284b1624621f13aef163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3801-8316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2289674043/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2289674043?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664685$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reavey, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnock, Neil D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbett, Amy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotter, Sheena C.</creatorcontrib><title>Aging in personal and social immunity: do immune traits senesce at the same rate?</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Summary How much should an individual invest in immunity as it grows older? Immunity is costly and its value is likely to change across an organism's lifespan. A limited number of studies have focused on how personal immune investment changes with age in insects, but we do not know how social immunity, immune responses that protect kin, changes across lifespan, or how resources are divided between these two arms of the immune response. In this study, both personal and social immune functions are considered in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. We show that personal immune function declines (phenoloxidase levels) or is maintained (defensin expression) across lifespan in nonbreeding beetles but is maintained (phenoloxidase levels) or even upregulated (defensin expression) in breeding individuals. In contrast, social immunity increases in breeding burying beetles up to middle age, before decreasing in old age. Social immunity is not affected by a wounding challenge across lifespan, whereas personal immunity, through PO, is upregulated following wounding to a similar extent across lifespan. Personal immune function may be prioritized in younger individuals in order to ensure survival until reproductive maturity. If not breeding, this may then drop off in later life as state declines. As burying beetles are ephemeral breeders, breeding opportunities in later life may be rare. When allowed to breed, beetles may therefore invest heavily in “staying alive” in order to complete what could potentially be their final reproductive opportunity. As parental care is important for the survival and growth of offspring in this genus, staying alive to provide care behaviors will clearly have fitness payoffs. This study shows that all immune traits do not senesce at the same rate. In fact, the patterns observed depend upon the immune traits measured and the breeding status of the individual. Multiple immune responses have evolved to protect the individual (personal) or their kin (social). Several studies have considered how personal immunity changes with age, but this is the first study to consider how social immunity changes with age. We found that in virgins, personal immunity declined or was maintained with age, while in breeders, it was maintained or even increased with age. Social immunity increased to middle age before falling in old age. We discuss the potential reasons for these differing responses to aging.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding status</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>defensin</subject><subject>ecological immunology</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>insect</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Investment policy</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>lifespan</subject><subject>lysozyme</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nicrophorus</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>parental care</subject><subject>Phenoloxidase</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Senescence</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Wounding</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFLHDEUx0OpVLEe-gVKoJd6WE0y2ZeMB0WWVQuCCO05ZDNv1shMsiYzLfvtzXZVbEEwl7yQH7-8lz8hXzg74oyJY3RYHXEA_YHsCSanE6Wm-uOrepcc5HzPygImJFOfyK4AAAl6ukduz5c-LKkPdIUpx2A7akNDc3S-lL7vx-CH9Qlt4vaAdEjWD5lmDJgdUjvQ4Q5ptj3SZAc8-0x2WttlPHja98mvi_nP2dXk-ubyx-z8euKm5ekJb5iVrNZOoJOVWDDLVSvaWoJspdOiqXWjARnWDrjQcsFBSBC85ZXFlkO1T0633tW46LFxGEpnnVkl39u0NtF68-9N8HdmGX8bCaC0EEXw_UmQ4sOIeTC9LxN1nQ0Yx2y4kjWwWin1DlQoUFKyqqDf_kPv45jKv2YjhK4LxeSGOtxSLsWcE7YvfXNmNrGaTaxmE2thv74e9IV8DrEAx1vgj-9w_bbJzGfz6q_yEWdYqko</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Reavey, Catherine E.</creator><creator>Warnock, Neil D.</creator><creator>Garbett, Amy P.</creator><creator>Cotter, Sheena C.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3801-8316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Aging in personal and social immunity: do immune traits senesce at the same rate?</title><author>Reavey, Catherine E. ; Warnock, Neil D. ; Garbett, Amy P. ; Cotter, Sheena C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5468-1d0a4098c2ec432b0a17f2f9464f4c82d98d86e0e9c61284b1624621f13aef163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding status</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>defensin</topic><topic>ecological immunology</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>insect</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Investment policy</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>lifespan</topic><topic>lysozyme</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nicrophorus</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>parental care</topic><topic>Phenoloxidase</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Senescence</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Wounding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reavey, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnock, Neil D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbett, Amy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotter, Sheena C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reavey, Catherine E.</au><au>Warnock, Neil D.</au><au>Garbett, Amy P.</au><au>Cotter, Sheena C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aging in personal and social immunity: do immune traits senesce at the same rate?</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>4365</spage><epage>4375</epage><pages>4365-4375</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Summary How much should an individual invest in immunity as it grows older? Immunity is costly and its value is likely to change across an organism's lifespan. A limited number of studies have focused on how personal immune investment changes with age in insects, but we do not know how social immunity, immune responses that protect kin, changes across lifespan, or how resources are divided between these two arms of the immune response. In this study, both personal and social immune functions are considered in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. We show that personal immune function declines (phenoloxidase levels) or is maintained (defensin expression) across lifespan in nonbreeding beetles but is maintained (phenoloxidase levels) or even upregulated (defensin expression) in breeding individuals. In contrast, social immunity increases in breeding burying beetles up to middle age, before decreasing in old age. Social immunity is not affected by a wounding challenge across lifespan, whereas personal immunity, through PO, is upregulated following wounding to a similar extent across lifespan. Personal immune function may be prioritized in younger individuals in order to ensure survival until reproductive maturity. If not breeding, this may then drop off in later life as state declines. As burying beetles are ephemeral breeders, breeding opportunities in later life may be rare. When allowed to breed, beetles may therefore invest heavily in “staying alive” in order to complete what could potentially be their final reproductive opportunity. As parental care is important for the survival and growth of offspring in this genus, staying alive to provide care behaviors will clearly have fitness payoffs. This study shows that all immune traits do not senesce at the same rate. In fact, the patterns observed depend upon the immune traits measured and the breeding status of the individual. Multiple immune responses have evolved to protect the individual (personal) or their kin (social). Several studies have considered how personal immunity changes with age, but this is the first study to consider how social immunity changes with age. We found that in virgins, personal immunity declined or was maintained with age, while in breeders, it was maintained or even increased with age. Social immunity increased to middle age before falling in old age. We discuss the potential reasons for these differing responses to aging.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>26664685</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.1668</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3801-8316</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2015-10, Vol.5 (19), p.4365-4375
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4667822
source PubMed (Medline); Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Age
Aging
Animal breeding
Antimicrobial agents
Bees
Beetles
Breeding
Breeding status
Coleoptera
defensin
ecological immunology
Fitness
Genes
Immune response
Immune system
Immunity
insect
Insects
Investment policy
Life span
lifespan
lysozyme
Mortality
Nicrophorus
Offspring
Original Research
parental care
Phenoloxidase
Physiology
Senescence
Studies
Survival
Wounding
title Aging in personal and social immunity: do immune traits senesce at the same rate?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A32%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aging%20in%20personal%20and%20social%20immunity:%20do%20immune%20traits%20senesce%20at%20the%20same%20rate?&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Reavey,%20Catherine%20E.&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=4365&rft.epage=4375&rft.pages=4365-4375&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.1668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2289674043%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5468-1d0a4098c2ec432b0a17f2f9464f4c82d98d86e0e9c61284b1624621f13aef163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289674043&rft_id=info:pmid/26664685&rfr_iscdi=true