Loading…

Floral traits driving reproductive isolation of two co-flowering taxa that share vertebrate pollinators

We investigated pollination in two plants that shared the same pollinators (bats and hummingbirds), overlapped in flowering and showed similarities in floral traits, favouring the mixture of pollen and the loss of plant genetic material. However, floral length differences between the plants enabled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AoB plants 2015-11, Vol.7, p.plv127
Main Authors: Queiroz, Joel A., Quirino, Zelma G. M., Machado, Isabel C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3b119c844cb57e00055e349a927d9b5640ff0c57d4f92064614db79e24348bd23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3b119c844cb57e00055e349a927d9b5640ff0c57d4f92064614db79e24348bd23
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page plv127
container_title AoB plants
container_volume 7
creator Queiroz, Joel A.
Quirino, Zelma G. M.
Machado, Isabel C.
description We investigated pollination in two plants that shared the same pollinators (bats and hummingbirds), overlapped in flowering and showed similarities in floral traits, favouring the mixture of pollen and the loss of plant genetic material. However, floral length differences between the plants enabled pollen deposition on different parts of the body of pollinators, reducing the mixture of pollen. In addition, differences in the opening times of the flowers can explain the more effective pollination by bats in one of the plants and by hummingbirds in the other. This trend to pollinator specialization may favour the coexistence of these plants. Abstract Floral attributes evolve in response to frequent and efficient pollinators, which are potentially important drivers of floral diversification and reproductive isolation. In this context, we asked, how do flowers evolve in a bat–hummingbird pollination system? Hence, we investigated the pollination ecology of two co-flowering Ipomoea taxa (I. marcellia and I. aff. marcellia) pollinated by bats and hummingbirds, and factors favouring reproductive isolation and pollinator sharing in these plants. To identify the most important drivers of reproductive isolation, we compared the flowers of the two Ipomoea taxa in terms of morphometry, anthesis and nectar production. Pollinator services were assessed using frequency of visits, fruit set and the number of seeds per fruit after visits. The studied Ipomoea taxa differed in corolla size and width, beginning and duration of anthesis, and nectar attributes. However, they shared the same diurnal and nocturnal visitors. The hummingbird Heliomaster squamosus was more frequent in I. marcellia (1.90 visits h−1) than in I. aff. marcellia (0.57 visits h−1), whereas glossophagine bats showed similar visit rates in both taxa (I. marcellia: 0.57 visits h−1 and I. aff. marcellia: 0.64 visits h−1). Bat pollination was more efficient in I. aff. marcellia, whereas pollination by hummingbirds was more efficient in I. marcellia. Differences in floral attributes between Ipomoea taxa, especially related to the anthesis period, length of floral parts and floral arrangement in the inflorescence, favour reproductive isolation from congeners through differential pollen placement on pollinators. This bat–hummingbird pollination system seems to be advantageous in the study area, where the availability of pollinators and floral resources changes considerably throughout the year, mainly as a result
doi_str_mv 10.1093/aobpla/plv127
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4676799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/aobpla/plv127</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4039098971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3b119c844cb57e00055e349a927d9b5640ff0c57d4f92064614db79e24348bd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LHTEUxUOxVLEuuy2BbroZzedkshGKVC0I3bTrkMlk3ovkzR2TzNj-9408tbYbs7mB--PcczgIfaDklBLNzyz0c7Rnc1wpU2_QESOCNqyT9ODF_xCd5HxL6uOsawV5hw5ZK2WniDhCm8sIyUZckg0l4yGFNUwbnPycYFhcCavHIUO0JcCEYcTlHrCDZoxw79MDWuwvi8vWFpy3Nnm8-lR8n2zxeIYYw2QLpPwevR1tzP7kcR6jn5dff1xcNzffr75dfLlpnJC0NLynVLtOCNdL5atlKT0X2mqmBt3L6n4ciZNqEKNmpBUtFUOvtGeCi64fGD9G53vdeel3fnB-qsmimVPY2fTbgA3m380UtmYDqxGtapXWVeDzo0CCu8XnYnYhOx-jnTws2VAldL3acV7RT_-ht7CkqcarVCeZFop3lWr2lEuQc_LjsxlKzEOLZt-i2bdY-Y8vEzzTT539dQjL_IrWH3iTqf0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785294738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Floral traits driving reproductive isolation of two co-flowering taxa that share vertebrate pollinators</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</source><creator>Queiroz, Joel A. ; Quirino, Zelma G. M. ; Machado, Isabel C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Joel A. ; Quirino, Zelma G. M. ; Machado, Isabel C.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated pollination in two plants that shared the same pollinators (bats and hummingbirds), overlapped in flowering and showed similarities in floral traits, favouring the mixture of pollen and the loss of plant genetic material. However, floral length differences between the plants enabled pollen deposition on different parts of the body of pollinators, reducing the mixture of pollen. In addition, differences in the opening times of the flowers can explain the more effective pollination by bats in one of the plants and by hummingbirds in the other. This trend to pollinator specialization may favour the coexistence of these plants. Abstract Floral attributes evolve in response to frequent and efficient pollinators, which are potentially important drivers of floral diversification and reproductive isolation. In this context, we asked, how do flowers evolve in a bat–hummingbird pollination system? Hence, we investigated the pollination ecology of two co-flowering Ipomoea taxa (I. marcellia and I. aff. marcellia) pollinated by bats and hummingbirds, and factors favouring reproductive isolation and pollinator sharing in these plants. To identify the most important drivers of reproductive isolation, we compared the flowers of the two Ipomoea taxa in terms of morphometry, anthesis and nectar production. Pollinator services were assessed using frequency of visits, fruit set and the number of seeds per fruit after visits. The studied Ipomoea taxa differed in corolla size and width, beginning and duration of anthesis, and nectar attributes. However, they shared the same diurnal and nocturnal visitors. The hummingbird Heliomaster squamosus was more frequent in I. marcellia (1.90 visits h−1) than in I. aff. marcellia (0.57 visits h−1), whereas glossophagine bats showed similar visit rates in both taxa (I. marcellia: 0.57 visits h−1 and I. aff. marcellia: 0.64 visits h−1). Bat pollination was more efficient in I. aff. marcellia, whereas pollination by hummingbirds was more efficient in I. marcellia. Differences in floral attributes between Ipomoea taxa, especially related to the anthesis period, length of floral parts and floral arrangement in the inflorescence, favour reproductive isolation from congeners through differential pollen placement on pollinators. This bat–hummingbird pollination system seems to be advantageous in the study area, where the availability of pollinators and floral resources changes considerably throughout the year, mainly as a result of rainfall seasonality. This interaction is beneficial for both sides, as it maximizes the number of potential pollen vectors for plants and resource availability for pollinators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-2851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-2851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26558704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><ispartof>AoB plants, 2015-11, Vol.7, p.plv127</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. 2015</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3b119c844cb57e00055e349a927d9b5640ff0c57d4f92064614db79e24348bd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3b119c844cb57e00055e349a927d9b5640ff0c57d4f92064614db79e24348bd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676799/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676799/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quirino, Zelma G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Isabel C.</creatorcontrib><title>Floral traits driving reproductive isolation of two co-flowering taxa that share vertebrate pollinators</title><title>AoB plants</title><addtitle>AoB Plants</addtitle><description>We investigated pollination in two plants that shared the same pollinators (bats and hummingbirds), overlapped in flowering and showed similarities in floral traits, favouring the mixture of pollen and the loss of plant genetic material. However, floral length differences between the plants enabled pollen deposition on different parts of the body of pollinators, reducing the mixture of pollen. In addition, differences in the opening times of the flowers can explain the more effective pollination by bats in one of the plants and by hummingbirds in the other. This trend to pollinator specialization may favour the coexistence of these plants. Abstract Floral attributes evolve in response to frequent and efficient pollinators, which are potentially important drivers of floral diversification and reproductive isolation. In this context, we asked, how do flowers evolve in a bat–hummingbird pollination system? Hence, we investigated the pollination ecology of two co-flowering Ipomoea taxa (I. marcellia and I. aff. marcellia) pollinated by bats and hummingbirds, and factors favouring reproductive isolation and pollinator sharing in these plants. To identify the most important drivers of reproductive isolation, we compared the flowers of the two Ipomoea taxa in terms of morphometry, anthesis and nectar production. Pollinator services were assessed using frequency of visits, fruit set and the number of seeds per fruit after visits. The studied Ipomoea taxa differed in corolla size and width, beginning and duration of anthesis, and nectar attributes. However, they shared the same diurnal and nocturnal visitors. The hummingbird Heliomaster squamosus was more frequent in I. marcellia (1.90 visits h−1) than in I. aff. marcellia (0.57 visits h−1), whereas glossophagine bats showed similar visit rates in both taxa (I. marcellia: 0.57 visits h−1 and I. aff. marcellia: 0.64 visits h−1). Bat pollination was more efficient in I. aff. marcellia, whereas pollination by hummingbirds was more efficient in I. marcellia. Differences in floral attributes between Ipomoea taxa, especially related to the anthesis period, length of floral parts and floral arrangement in the inflorescence, favour reproductive isolation from congeners through differential pollen placement on pollinators. This bat–hummingbird pollination system seems to be advantageous in the study area, where the availability of pollinators and floral resources changes considerably throughout the year, mainly as a result of rainfall seasonality. This interaction is beneficial for both sides, as it maximizes the number of potential pollen vectors for plants and resource availability for pollinators.</description><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><issn>2041-2851</issn><issn>2041-2851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1LHTEUxUOxVLEuuy2BbroZzedkshGKVC0I3bTrkMlk3ovkzR2TzNj-9408tbYbs7mB--PcczgIfaDklBLNzyz0c7Rnc1wpU2_QESOCNqyT9ODF_xCd5HxL6uOsawV5hw5ZK2WniDhCm8sIyUZckg0l4yGFNUwbnPycYFhcCavHIUO0JcCEYcTlHrCDZoxw79MDWuwvi8vWFpy3Nnm8-lR8n2zxeIYYw2QLpPwevR1tzP7kcR6jn5dff1xcNzffr75dfLlpnJC0NLynVLtOCNdL5atlKT0X2mqmBt3L6n4ciZNqEKNmpBUtFUOvtGeCi64fGD9G53vdeel3fnB-qsmimVPY2fTbgA3m380UtmYDqxGtapXWVeDzo0CCu8XnYnYhOx-jnTws2VAldL3acV7RT_-ht7CkqcarVCeZFop3lWr2lEuQc_LjsxlKzEOLZt-i2bdY-Y8vEzzTT539dQjL_IrWH3iTqf0</recordid><startdate>20151110</startdate><enddate>20151110</enddate><creator>Queiroz, Joel A.</creator><creator>Quirino, Zelma G. M.</creator><creator>Machado, Isabel C.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151110</creationdate><title>Floral traits driving reproductive isolation of two co-flowering taxa that share vertebrate pollinators</title><author>Queiroz, Joel A. ; Quirino, Zelma G. M. ; Machado, Isabel C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3b119c844cb57e00055e349a927d9b5640ff0c57d4f92064614db79e24348bd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quirino, Zelma G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Isabel C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AoB plants</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Queiroz, Joel A.</au><au>Quirino, Zelma G. M.</au><au>Machado, Isabel C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Floral traits driving reproductive isolation of two co-flowering taxa that share vertebrate pollinators</atitle><jtitle>AoB plants</jtitle><addtitle>AoB Plants</addtitle><date>2015-11-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>plv127</spage><pages>plv127-</pages><issn>2041-2851</issn><eissn>2041-2851</eissn><abstract>We investigated pollination in two plants that shared the same pollinators (bats and hummingbirds), overlapped in flowering and showed similarities in floral traits, favouring the mixture of pollen and the loss of plant genetic material. However, floral length differences between the plants enabled pollen deposition on different parts of the body of pollinators, reducing the mixture of pollen. In addition, differences in the opening times of the flowers can explain the more effective pollination by bats in one of the plants and by hummingbirds in the other. This trend to pollinator specialization may favour the coexistence of these plants. Abstract Floral attributes evolve in response to frequent and efficient pollinators, which are potentially important drivers of floral diversification and reproductive isolation. In this context, we asked, how do flowers evolve in a bat–hummingbird pollination system? Hence, we investigated the pollination ecology of two co-flowering Ipomoea taxa (I. marcellia and I. aff. marcellia) pollinated by bats and hummingbirds, and factors favouring reproductive isolation and pollinator sharing in these plants. To identify the most important drivers of reproductive isolation, we compared the flowers of the two Ipomoea taxa in terms of morphometry, anthesis and nectar production. Pollinator services were assessed using frequency of visits, fruit set and the number of seeds per fruit after visits. The studied Ipomoea taxa differed in corolla size and width, beginning and duration of anthesis, and nectar attributes. However, they shared the same diurnal and nocturnal visitors. The hummingbird Heliomaster squamosus was more frequent in I. marcellia (1.90 visits h−1) than in I. aff. marcellia (0.57 visits h−1), whereas glossophagine bats showed similar visit rates in both taxa (I. marcellia: 0.57 visits h−1 and I. aff. marcellia: 0.64 visits h−1). Bat pollination was more efficient in I. aff. marcellia, whereas pollination by hummingbirds was more efficient in I. marcellia. Differences in floral attributes between Ipomoea taxa, especially related to the anthesis period, length of floral parts and floral arrangement in the inflorescence, favour reproductive isolation from congeners through differential pollen placement on pollinators. This bat–hummingbird pollination system seems to be advantageous in the study area, where the availability of pollinators and floral resources changes considerably throughout the year, mainly as a result of rainfall seasonality. This interaction is beneficial for both sides, as it maximizes the number of potential pollen vectors for plants and resource availability for pollinators.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>26558704</pmid><doi>10.1093/aobpla/plv127</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-2851
ispartof AoB plants, 2015-11, Vol.7, p.plv127
issn 2041-2851
2041-2851
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4676799
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals
subjects Plant reproduction
title Floral traits driving reproductive isolation of two co-flowering taxa that share vertebrate pollinators
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Floral%20traits%20driving%20reproductive%20isolation%20of%20two%20co-flowering%20taxa%20that%20share%20vertebrate%20pollinators&rft.jtitle=AoB%20plants&rft.au=Queiroz,%20Joel%20A.&rft.date=2015-11-10&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=plv127&rft.pages=plv127-&rft.issn=2041-2851&rft.eissn=2041-2851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aobpla/plv127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4039098971%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3b119c844cb57e00055e349a927d9b5640ff0c57d4f92064614db79e24348bd23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785294738&rft_id=info:pmid/26558704&rft_oup_id=10.1093/aobpla/plv127&rfr_iscdi=true