Association of goals of care meetings for hospitalized cancer patients at risk for critical care with patient outcomes

• Published in: Palliative medicine 2015-04, Vol.29 (4), p.386-390
• Main Authors: Apostol, Colleen C, Waldfogel, Julie M, Pfoh, Elizabeth R, List, Donald, Billing, Lynn S, Nesbit, Suzanne A, Dy, Sydney Morss
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Cancer; Case-Control Studies; Clinical outcomes; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Communication; Critical care; Critical Care - statistics & numerical data; Female; Goals; Health Services Needs and Demand; Health services utilization; Hospice Care - statistics & numerical data; Hospitalization; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Intensive care; Length of Stay; Leukemia; Lymphoma; Male; Medical prognosis; Medical records; Meetings; Metastasis; Middle Aged; Monitoring systems; Neoplasms - therapy; Oncology; Palliative care; Patient Care Planning; Patient Preference; Patients; Pilot Projects
• ISSN: 0269-2163; 1477-030X
• DOI: 10.1177/0269216314560800

Background: Caring for cancer patients with advanced and refractory disease requires communication about care preferences, particularly when patients become ill enough to be at risk for critical care interventions potentially inconsistent with their preferences. Aim: To describe the use of goals of care discussions in patients with advanced/refractory cancer at risk for critical care interventions and evaluate associations between these discussions and outcomes. Design: Cohort study describing patients/families’ perceptions of goals of care meetings and comparing health care utilization outcomes of patients who did and did not have discussions. Setting/participants: Inpatient units of an academic cancer center. Included patients had metastatic solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphoma or leukemia and were at risk for critical care, defined as requiring supplemental oxygen and/or cardiac monitor. Results: Of 86 patients enrolled, 34 (39%) had a reported goals of care discussion (study group). Patients/families reported their needs and goals were addressed moderately to quite a bit during the meetings. Patients in the study group were less likely to receive critical care (0% vs 22%, p = 0.003) and more likely to be discharged to hospice (48% vs 30%, p = 0.04) than the control group. Only one patient in the study group died during the index hospitalization (on comfort care) (3%) compared with 9(17%) in the control group (p = 0.08). Conclusion: Goals of care meetings for advanced/refractory cancer inpatients at risk for critical care interventions can address patient and family goals and needs and improve health care utilization. These meetings should be part of routine care for these patients.