Loading…
Detection of the Number of Changes in a Display in Working Memory
Here we examine a new task to assess working memory for visual arrays in which the participant must judge how many items changed from a studied array to a test array. As a clue to processing, on some trials in the first 2 experiments, participants carried out a metamemory judgment in which they were...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.169-185 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a562t-e191996c4cfbe1b11025fbe243e3baf73c8257e597e23d3a89e2d5014dc5e4463 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 185 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Cowan, Nelson Hardman, Kyle Saults, J. Scott Blume, Christopher L. Clark, Katherine M. Sunday, Mackenzie A. |
description | Here we examine a new task to assess working memory for visual arrays in which the participant must judge how many items changed from a studied array to a test array. As a clue to processing, on some trials in the first 2 experiments, participants carried out a metamemory judgment in which they were to decide how many items were in working memory. Trial-to-trial fluctuations in these working memory storage judgments correlated with performance fluctuations within an individual, indicating a need to include trial-to-trial variation within capacity models (through either capacity fluctuation or some other attention parameter). Mathematical modeling of the results achieved a good fit to a complex pattern of results, suggesting that working memory capacity limits can apply even to judgments that involve an entire array rather than just a single item that may have changed, thus providing the expected conscious access to at least some of the contents of working memory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xlm0000163 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4737980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1090036</ericid><sourcerecordid>1703256681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a562t-e191996c4cfbe1b11025fbe243e3baf73c8257e597e23d3a89e2d5014dc5e4463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctv1DAQxi0Eokvhwh0UiQsCBWyPH_EFqdqWlwpcQBwtxzvZdUni1E4Q-9-TaMvyOOCLPfp--sYzHyEPGX3BKOiXP9qOzocpuEVWzIApGa_kbbKiXFelBgMn5F7OVwtEobpLTrgCLXUFK3J2jiP6McS-iE0x7rD4OHU1pqVa71y_xVyEvnDFechD6_ZL8TWmb6HfFh-wi2l_n9xpXJvxwc19Sr68vvi8fltefnrzbn12WTqp-FgiM8wY5YVvamQ1Y5TL-cUFINSu0eArLjVKo5HDBlxlkG8kZWLjJQqh4JS8OvgOU93hxmM_JtfaIYXOpb2NLti_lT7s7DZ-t0KDNhWdDZ7eGKR4PWEebReyx7Z1PcYpW6YVB6GMWNAn_6BXcUr9PN5CVcCFEPL_FAUularYTD07UD7FnBM2xy8zapf87O_8Zvjxn0Me0V-BzcCjA4Ap-KN88Z5RM2e7bOn5QXeDs0Pee5fG4FvMfkppXszSzApuuWXKwE8JuazE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1703256681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of the Number of Changes in a Display in Working Memory</title><source>ERIC</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Cowan, Nelson ; Hardman, Kyle ; Saults, J. Scott ; Blume, Christopher L. ; Clark, Katherine M. ; Sunday, Mackenzie A.</creator><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Nelson ; Hardman, Kyle ; Saults, J. Scott ; Blume, Christopher L. ; Clark, Katherine M. ; Sunday, Mackenzie A. ; Greene, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>Here we examine a new task to assess working memory for visual arrays in which the participant must judge how many items changed from a studied array to a test array. As a clue to processing, on some trials in the first 2 experiments, participants carried out a metamemory judgment in which they were to decide how many items were in working memory. Trial-to-trial fluctuations in these working memory storage judgments correlated with performance fluctuations within an individual, indicating a need to include trial-to-trial variation within capacity models (through either capacity fluctuation or some other attention parameter). Mathematical modeling of the results achieved a good fit to a complex pattern of results, suggesting that working memory capacity limits can apply even to judgments that involve an entire array rather than just a single item that may have changed, thus providing the expected conscious access to at least some of the contents of working memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000163</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26375783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Auditory Stimuli ; Awareness ; Cognition & reasoning ; College Students ; Color ; Correlation ; Experimental Psychology ; Female ; Goodness of Fit ; Human ; Human Channel Capacity ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Judgment ; Male ; Mathematical Modeling ; Mathematical Models ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term ; Metacognition ; Models, Psychological ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychological Tests ; Short Term Memory ; Visual Perception ; Visual Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.169-185</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a562t-e191996c4cfbe1b11025fbe243e3baf73c8257e597e23d3a89e2d5014dc5e4463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1090036$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26375783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardman, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saults, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blume, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunday, Mackenzie A.</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of the Number of Changes in a Display in Working Memory</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Here we examine a new task to assess working memory for visual arrays in which the participant must judge how many items changed from a studied array to a test array. As a clue to processing, on some trials in the first 2 experiments, participants carried out a metamemory judgment in which they were to decide how many items were in working memory. Trial-to-trial fluctuations in these working memory storage judgments correlated with performance fluctuations within an individual, indicating a need to include trial-to-trial variation within capacity models (through either capacity fluctuation or some other attention parameter). Mathematical modeling of the results achieved a good fit to a complex pattern of results, suggesting that working memory capacity limits can apply even to judgments that involve an entire array rather than just a single item that may have changed, thus providing the expected conscious access to at least some of the contents of working memory.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goodness of Fit</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Channel Capacity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical Modeling</subject><subject>Mathematical Models</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctv1DAQxi0Eokvhwh0UiQsCBWyPH_EFqdqWlwpcQBwtxzvZdUni1E4Q-9-TaMvyOOCLPfp--sYzHyEPGX3BKOiXP9qOzocpuEVWzIApGa_kbbKiXFelBgMn5F7OVwtEobpLTrgCLXUFK3J2jiP6McS-iE0x7rD4OHU1pqVa71y_xVyEvnDFechD6_ZL8TWmb6HfFh-wi2l_n9xpXJvxwc19Sr68vvi8fltefnrzbn12WTqp-FgiM8wY5YVvamQ1Y5TL-cUFINSu0eArLjVKo5HDBlxlkG8kZWLjJQqh4JS8OvgOU93hxmM_JtfaIYXOpb2NLti_lT7s7DZ-t0KDNhWdDZ7eGKR4PWEebReyx7Z1PcYpW6YVB6GMWNAn_6BXcUr9PN5CVcCFEPL_FAUularYTD07UD7FnBM2xy8zapf87O_8Zvjxn0Me0V-BzcCjA4Ap-KN88Z5RM2e7bOn5QXeDs0Pee5fG4FvMfkppXszSzApuuWXKwE8JuazE</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Cowan, Nelson</creator><creator>Hardman, Kyle</creator><creator>Saults, J. Scott</creator><creator>Blume, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Clark, Katherine M.</creator><creator>Sunday, Mackenzie A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Detection of the Number of Changes in a Display in Working Memory</title><author>Cowan, Nelson ; Hardman, Kyle ; Saults, J. Scott ; Blume, Christopher L. ; Clark, Katherine M. ; Sunday, Mackenzie A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a562t-e191996c4cfbe1b11025fbe243e3baf73c8257e597e23d3a89e2d5014dc5e4463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goodness of Fit</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Channel Capacity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical Modeling</topic><topic>Mathematical Models</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardman, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saults, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blume, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunday, Mackenzie A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cowan, Nelson</au><au>Hardman, Kyle</au><au>Saults, J. Scott</au><au>Blume, Christopher L.</au><au>Clark, Katherine M.</au><au>Sunday, Mackenzie A.</au><au>Greene, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1090036</ericid><atitle>Detection of the Number of Changes in a Display in Working Memory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>169-185</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Here we examine a new task to assess working memory for visual arrays in which the participant must judge how many items changed from a studied array to a test array. As a clue to processing, on some trials in the first 2 experiments, participants carried out a metamemory judgment in which they were to decide how many items were in working memory. Trial-to-trial fluctuations in these working memory storage judgments correlated with performance fluctuations within an individual, indicating a need to include trial-to-trial variation within capacity models (through either capacity fluctuation or some other attention parameter). Mathematical modeling of the results achieved a good fit to a complex pattern of results, suggesting that working memory capacity limits can apply even to judgments that involve an entire array rather than just a single item that may have changed, thus providing the expected conscious access to at least some of the contents of working memory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26375783</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000163</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.169-185 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4737980 |
source | ERIC; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Attention Auditory Stimuli Awareness Cognition & reasoning College Students Color Correlation Experimental Psychology Female Goodness of Fit Human Human Channel Capacity Humans Individual Differences Judgment Male Mathematical Modeling Mathematical Models Memory Memory, Short-Term Metacognition Models, Psychological Photic Stimulation Psychological Tests Short Term Memory Visual Perception Visual Stimuli |
title | Detection of the Number of Changes in a Display in Working Memory |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A43%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20the%20Number%20of%20Changes%20in%20a%20Display%20in%20Working%20Memory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Cowan,%20Nelson&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=169-185&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000163&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1703256681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a562t-e191996c4cfbe1b11025fbe243e3baf73c8257e597e23d3a89e2d5014dc5e4463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1703256681&rft_id=info:pmid/26375783&rft_ericid=EJ1090036&rfr_iscdi=true |