Implementing research results in clinical practice- the experiences of healthcare professionals

• Published in: BMC health services research 2016-02, Vol.16 (48), p.48-48, Article 48
• Main Authors: Kristensen, Nanna, Nymann, Camilla, Konradsen, Hanne
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Clinical medicine; Clinical Protocols; Clinical psychiatry; Content analysis; Decision Making; Evidence-Based Medicine; Explicit knowledge; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Humans; Innovations; Interviews; Interviews as Topic; Medical care; Medical personnel; Nurses; Professional ethics; Professionals; Qualitative Research; Researchers; Translational Medical Research; United States
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1292-y

In healthcare research, results diffuse only slowly into clinical practice, and there is a need to bridge the gap between research and practice. This study elucidates how healthcare professionals in a hospital setting experience working with the implementation of research results. A descriptive design was chosen. During 2014, 12 interviews were carried out with healthcare professionals representing different roles in the implementation process, based on semi-structured interview guidelines. The analysis was guided by a directed content analysis approach. The initial implementation was non-formalized. In the decision-making and management process, the pattern among nurses and doctors, respectively, was found to be different. While nurses' decisions tended to be problem-oriented and managed on a person-driven basis, doctors' decisions were consensus-oriented and managed by autonomy. All, however, experienced a knowledge-based execution of the research results, as the implementation process ended. The results illuminate the challenges involved in closing the evidence-practice gap, and may add to the growing body of knowledge on which basis actions can be taken to ensure the best care and treatment available actually reaches the patient.