Loading…
Evaluation of automated large-scale screening tests for syphilis
Two methods of performing serological screening tests for syphilis are compared. One consisted of the Venereal Diseases Reference Laboratory (VDRL) slide test, the cardiolipin Wassermann reaction (CWR), and the Reiter protein complement fixation test (RPCFT) performed manually; the other was a fully...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical pathology 1976-04, Vol.29 (4), p.317-321 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b475t-6221fdc42674750c4968c7d7e0e2fcde726c06ddfb2b3d91623ebc98947d7f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b475t-6221fdc42674750c4968c7d7e0e2fcde726c06ddfb2b3d91623ebc98947d7f3 |
container_end_page | 321 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 317 |
container_title | Journal of clinical pathology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Macfarlane, D E Hare, K Elias-Jones, T F |
description | Two methods of performing serological screening tests for syphilis are compared. One consisted of the Venereal Diseases Reference Laboratory (VDRL) slide test, the cardiolipin Wassermann reaction (CWR), and the Reiter protein complement fixation test (RPCFT) performed manually; the other was a fully automated system using two Technicon AutoAnalyzers (AAII), one for the automated reagin test (ART) and the other for automated complement fixation tests. The absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody test (FTA-ABS) was used as a final arbiter in all cases found to be seropositive by either method. A pooled antigen consisting of a mixture of cardiolipin and Reiter protein was used for the automated complement fixation test, thus increasing the scope and capacity of the system. The AutoAnalyzer was shown to be capable of performing 400 cardiolipin and Reiter complement fixation tests and 700 automated reagin tests in an 8-hour day. Modification of the complement fixation test method to take advantage of the highly sensitive colorimeter resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity and a corresponding saving in reagents. Of the 7843 sera tested, 258 gave a positive result in one or more of the screening tests. The automated test detected many more Reiter positive sera (127) than the manual test (83). Conversely, fewer CWR positive sera were detected by the automated test (60) than by the manual test (82). There was little difference between the number of positive sera detected by the ART (73) and the VDRL slide test (71). In 19 instances the automated tests detected positive sera which registered as completely negative in the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests. It was concluded that a combination of the ART and automated Reiter protein complement fixation test (ARPCFT) would be ideal for use in a large-scale screening programme for the detection of syphilis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jcp.29.4.317 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_476055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3971009681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b475t-6221fdc42674750c4968c7d7e0e2fcde726c06ddfb2b3d91623ebc98947d7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhq0KCkvLjSOHSEjlQrb-imdzqARaFUq7olJbcbUcZ7L1ksSLnVTtv8dVqhXlwGk0ep_5fAl5x-icMaGON3Y75-VczgWDPTJjEngumVQvyIxSzvISpHpN3sS4oZQJYOIV2QcAKosZ-Xx6Z9rRDM73mW8yMw6-MwPWWWvCGvNoTYtZtAGxd_06GzAOMWt8yOLD9ta1Lh6Sl41pI759igfk-uvpzfIsX11--778ssorCcWQK85ZU1vJFaScWlmqhYUakCJvbI3AlaWqrpuKV6IumeICK1suSpmgRhyQk6nrdqw6rC32QzCt3gbXmfCgvXH6udK7W732d1qCokWR6o-e6oP_PaYjdOeixbY1Pfox6oUQAoTkCfzwD7jxY-jTZZo9voxSBSpRnybKBh9jwGa3CaP60ROdPNG81FInTxL-_u_td_BkQpLzSXZxwPudasIvrUBAoX_8XOoVZaDU-YW-SvzHia-6zf8H_wE976P3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770400676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of automated large-scale screening tests for syphilis</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Macfarlane, D E ; Hare, K ; Elias-Jones, T F</creator><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, D E ; Hare, K ; Elias-Jones, T F</creatorcontrib><description>Two methods of performing serological screening tests for syphilis are compared. One consisted of the Venereal Diseases Reference Laboratory (VDRL) slide test, the cardiolipin Wassermann reaction (CWR), and the Reiter protein complement fixation test (RPCFT) performed manually; the other was a fully automated system using two Technicon AutoAnalyzers (AAII), one for the automated reagin test (ART) and the other for automated complement fixation tests. The absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody test (FTA-ABS) was used as a final arbiter in all cases found to be seropositive by either method. A pooled antigen consisting of a mixture of cardiolipin and Reiter protein was used for the automated complement fixation test, thus increasing the scope and capacity of the system. The AutoAnalyzer was shown to be capable of performing 400 cardiolipin and Reiter complement fixation tests and 700 automated reagin tests in an 8-hour day. Modification of the complement fixation test method to take advantage of the highly sensitive colorimeter resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity and a corresponding saving in reagents. Of the 7843 sera tested, 258 gave a positive result in one or more of the screening tests. The automated test detected many more Reiter positive sera (127) than the manual test (83). Conversely, fewer CWR positive sera were detected by the automated test (60) than by the manual test (82). There was little difference between the number of positive sera detected by the ART (73) and the VDRL slide test (71). In 19 instances the automated tests detected positive sera which registered as completely negative in the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests. It was concluded that a combination of the ART and automated Reiter protein complement fixation test (ARPCFT) would be ideal for use in a large-scale screening programme for the detection of syphilis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jcp.29.4.317</identifier><identifier>PMID: 777045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPAAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</publisher><subject>Autoanalysis ; Colorimetry ; Complement Fixation Tests ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pathology, 1976-04, Vol.29 (4), p.317-321</ispartof><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Apr 1976</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b475t-6221fdc42674750c4968c7d7e0e2fcde726c06ddfb2b3d91623ebc98947d7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b475t-6221fdc42674750c4968c7d7e0e2fcde726c06ddfb2b3d91623ebc98947d7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC476055/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC476055/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/777045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elias-Jones, T F</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of automated large-scale screening tests for syphilis</title><title>Journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>Two methods of performing serological screening tests for syphilis are compared. One consisted of the Venereal Diseases Reference Laboratory (VDRL) slide test, the cardiolipin Wassermann reaction (CWR), and the Reiter protein complement fixation test (RPCFT) performed manually; the other was a fully automated system using two Technicon AutoAnalyzers (AAII), one for the automated reagin test (ART) and the other for automated complement fixation tests. The absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody test (FTA-ABS) was used as a final arbiter in all cases found to be seropositive by either method. A pooled antigen consisting of a mixture of cardiolipin and Reiter protein was used for the automated complement fixation test, thus increasing the scope and capacity of the system. The AutoAnalyzer was shown to be capable of performing 400 cardiolipin and Reiter complement fixation tests and 700 automated reagin tests in an 8-hour day. Modification of the complement fixation test method to take advantage of the highly sensitive colorimeter resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity and a corresponding saving in reagents. Of the 7843 sera tested, 258 gave a positive result in one or more of the screening tests. The automated test detected many more Reiter positive sera (127) than the manual test (83). Conversely, fewer CWR positive sera were detected by the automated test (60) than by the manual test (82). There was little difference between the number of positive sera detected by the ART (73) and the VDRL slide test (71). In 19 instances the automated tests detected positive sera which registered as completely negative in the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests. It was concluded that a combination of the ART and automated Reiter protein complement fixation test (ARPCFT) would be ideal for use in a large-scale screening programme for the detection of syphilis.</description><subject>Autoanalysis</subject><subject>Colorimetry</subject><subject>Complement Fixation Tests</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0021-9746</issn><issn>1472-4146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhq0KCkvLjSOHSEjlQrb-imdzqARaFUq7olJbcbUcZ7L1ksSLnVTtv8dVqhXlwGk0ep_5fAl5x-icMaGON3Y75-VczgWDPTJjEngumVQvyIxSzvISpHpN3sS4oZQJYOIV2QcAKosZ-Xx6Z9rRDM73mW8yMw6-MwPWWWvCGvNoTYtZtAGxd_06GzAOMWt8yOLD9ta1Lh6Sl41pI759igfk-uvpzfIsX11--778ssorCcWQK85ZU1vJFaScWlmqhYUakCJvbI3AlaWqrpuKV6IumeICK1suSpmgRhyQk6nrdqw6rC32QzCt3gbXmfCgvXH6udK7W732d1qCokWR6o-e6oP_PaYjdOeixbY1Pfox6oUQAoTkCfzwD7jxY-jTZZo9voxSBSpRnybKBh9jwGa3CaP60ROdPNG81FInTxL-_u_td_BkQpLzSXZxwPudasIvrUBAoX_8XOoVZaDU-YW-SvzHia-6zf8H_wE976P3</recordid><startdate>19760401</startdate><enddate>19760401</enddate><creator>Macfarlane, D E</creator><creator>Hare, K</creator><creator>Elias-Jones, T F</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19760401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of automated large-scale screening tests for syphilis</title><author>Macfarlane, D E ; Hare, K ; Elias-Jones, T F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b475t-6221fdc42674750c4968c7d7e0e2fcde726c06ddfb2b3d91623ebc98947d7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Autoanalysis</topic><topic>Colorimetry</topic><topic>Complement Fixation Tests</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elias-Jones, T F</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macfarlane, D E</au><au>Hare, K</au><au>Elias-Jones, T F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of automated large-scale screening tests for syphilis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>1976-04-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>317-321</pages><issn>0021-9746</issn><eissn>1472-4146</eissn><coden>JCPAAK</coden><abstract>Two methods of performing serological screening tests for syphilis are compared. One consisted of the Venereal Diseases Reference Laboratory (VDRL) slide test, the cardiolipin Wassermann reaction (CWR), and the Reiter protein complement fixation test (RPCFT) performed manually; the other was a fully automated system using two Technicon AutoAnalyzers (AAII), one for the automated reagin test (ART) and the other for automated complement fixation tests. The absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody test (FTA-ABS) was used as a final arbiter in all cases found to be seropositive by either method. A pooled antigen consisting of a mixture of cardiolipin and Reiter protein was used for the automated complement fixation test, thus increasing the scope and capacity of the system. The AutoAnalyzer was shown to be capable of performing 400 cardiolipin and Reiter complement fixation tests and 700 automated reagin tests in an 8-hour day. Modification of the complement fixation test method to take advantage of the highly sensitive colorimeter resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity and a corresponding saving in reagents. Of the 7843 sera tested, 258 gave a positive result in one or more of the screening tests. The automated test detected many more Reiter positive sera (127) than the manual test (83). Conversely, fewer CWR positive sera were detected by the automated test (60) than by the manual test (82). There was little difference between the number of positive sera detected by the ART (73) and the VDRL slide test (71). In 19 instances the automated tests detected positive sera which registered as completely negative in the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests. It was concluded that a combination of the ART and automated Reiter protein complement fixation test (ARPCFT) would be ideal for use in a large-scale screening programme for the detection of syphilis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</pub><pmid>777045</pmid><doi>10.1136/jcp.29.4.317</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9746 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical pathology, 1976-04, Vol.29 (4), p.317-321 |
issn | 0021-9746 1472-4146 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_476055 |
source | PubMed (Medline) |
subjects | Autoanalysis Colorimetry Complement Fixation Tests Evaluation Studies as Topic Fluorescent Antibody Technique Humans Mass Screening Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods Time Factors |
title | Evaluation of automated large-scale screening tests for syphilis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20automated%20large-scale%20screening%20tests%20for%20syphilis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Macfarlane,%20D%20E&rft.date=1976-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=317-321&rft.issn=0021-9746&rft.eissn=1472-4146&rft.coden=JCPAAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jcp.29.4.317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3971009681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b475t-6221fdc42674750c4968c7d7e0e2fcde726c06ddfb2b3d91623ebc98947d7f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770400676&rft_id=info:pmid/777045&rfr_iscdi=true |