Loading…
Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of source–sink dynamics
Summary Many factors affect the presence and exchange of individuals among subpopulations and influence not only the emergence, but the strength of ensuing source–sink dynamics within metapopulations. Yet their relative contributions remain largely unexplored. To help identify the characteristics of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and evolution 2016-02, Vol.6 (4), p.892-904 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-8e287399cab7945578a6f58bd1c49dd9477e84226750d49f53a0920e1894b3a43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-8e287399cab7945578a6f58bd1c49dd9477e84226750d49f53a0920e1894b3a43 |
container_end_page | 904 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 892 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Heinrichs, Julie A. Lawler, Joshua J. Schumaker, Nathan H. |
description | Summary
Many factors affect the presence and exchange of individuals among subpopulations and influence not only the emergence, but the strength of ensuing source–sink dynamics within metapopulations. Yet their relative contributions remain largely unexplored. To help identify the characteristics of empirical systems that are likely to exhibit strong versus weak source–sink dynamics and inform their differential management, we compared the relative roles of influential factors in strengthening source–sink dynamics. In a series of controlled experiments within a spatially explicit individual‐based model framework, we varied patch quality, patch size, the dispersion of high‐ and low‐quality patches, population growth rates, dispersal distances, and environmental stochasticity in a factorial design. We then recorded source–sink dynamics that emerged from the simulated habitat and population factors. Long‐term differences in births and deaths were quantified for sources and sinks in each system and used in a statistical model to rank the influences of key factors. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and that experience relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations) are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Strong source–sink dynamics emerged under diverse combinations of factors, suggesting that simple inferences of process from pattern will likely be inadequate to predict and assess the strength of source–sink dynamics. Our results also suggest that it may be more difficult to detect and accurately measure source–sink dynamics in slow‐growing populations, highly variable environments, and where a subtle gradient of habitat quality exists.
The conditions and mechanisms that give rise to source–sink dynamics are poorly understood. To better identify systems in need of careful data collection and management, we use a series of controlled experiments using novel simulation methods to examine factors that incite and drive ecological systems to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and in relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations), are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.2029 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4761763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1770879935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-8e287399cab7945578a6f58bd1c49dd9477e84226750d49f53a0920e1894b3a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKAzEYhYMottQufAEZcKOLtplcJxtBStVCwY2uQ5rJaOpcatKpduc7-IY-iRnbShUEs_kT_o_DyTkAHMewH0OIBkYb3EcQiT3QRpDQHuc02d-5t0DX-xkMh0FEID8ELcQEiQWmbSDG5cLZ0lsdqTKNzOv2lTq7NM5HVRb5qnbafLy9e1s-RemqVIXV_ggcZCr3pruZHXB_Nbob3vQmt9fj4eWkpylBopcYlHAshFZTLgilPFEso8k0jTURaSoI5yYhCDFOYUpERrGCAkETJ4JMsSK4Ay7WuvN6WphUm2BY5XLubKHcSlbKyp-b0j7Kh2opCWcxZzgInG0EXPVcG7-QhfXa5LkqTVV7GXPOGGEco_-gMOEiJBfQ01_oLMRUhiQkgpgyFKDG_Pma0q7y3pns23cMZVOfbOqTTX2BPdn96De5LSsAgzXwYnOz-ltJjoYj_CX5CQ49oug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2035629354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of source–sink dynamics</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Heinrichs, Julie A. ; Lawler, Joshua J. ; Schumaker, Nathan H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heinrichs, Julie A. ; Lawler, Joshua J. ; Schumaker, Nathan H.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Many factors affect the presence and exchange of individuals among subpopulations and influence not only the emergence, but the strength of ensuing source–sink dynamics within metapopulations. Yet their relative contributions remain largely unexplored. To help identify the characteristics of empirical systems that are likely to exhibit strong versus weak source–sink dynamics and inform their differential management, we compared the relative roles of influential factors in strengthening source–sink dynamics. In a series of controlled experiments within a spatially explicit individual‐based model framework, we varied patch quality, patch size, the dispersion of high‐ and low‐quality patches, population growth rates, dispersal distances, and environmental stochasticity in a factorial design. We then recorded source–sink dynamics that emerged from the simulated habitat and population factors. Long‐term differences in births and deaths were quantified for sources and sinks in each system and used in a statistical model to rank the influences of key factors. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and that experience relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations) are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Strong source–sink dynamics emerged under diverse combinations of factors, suggesting that simple inferences of process from pattern will likely be inadequate to predict and assess the strength of source–sink dynamics. Our results also suggest that it may be more difficult to detect and accurately measure source–sink dynamics in slow‐growing populations, highly variable environments, and where a subtle gradient of habitat quality exists.
The conditions and mechanisms that give rise to source–sink dynamics are poorly understood. To better identify systems in need of careful data collection and management, we use a series of controlled experiments using novel simulation methods to examine factors that incite and drive ecological systems to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and in relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations), are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics, and these systems may require additional consideration to design and implement successful habitat and population management plans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26941935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Demography Beyond the Population ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Dynamics ; Factorial design ; Growth rate ; Habitat quality ; Habitats ; individual‐based model ; landscape pattern ; Mathematical models ; Metapopulations ; Population (statistical) ; Population growth ; Source-sink relationships ; source‐sink dynamics ; Statistical models ; Stochasticity ; Subpopulations</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2016-02, Vol.6 (4), p.892-904</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-8e287399cab7945578a6f58bd1c49dd9477e84226750d49f53a0920e1894b3a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-8e287399cab7945578a6f58bd1c49dd9477e84226750d49f53a0920e1894b3a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2035629354/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2035629354?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heinrichs, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Joshua J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumaker, Nathan H.</creatorcontrib><title>Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of source–sink dynamics</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Summary
Many factors affect the presence and exchange of individuals among subpopulations and influence not only the emergence, but the strength of ensuing source–sink dynamics within metapopulations. Yet their relative contributions remain largely unexplored. To help identify the characteristics of empirical systems that are likely to exhibit strong versus weak source–sink dynamics and inform their differential management, we compared the relative roles of influential factors in strengthening source–sink dynamics. In a series of controlled experiments within a spatially explicit individual‐based model framework, we varied patch quality, patch size, the dispersion of high‐ and low‐quality patches, population growth rates, dispersal distances, and environmental stochasticity in a factorial design. We then recorded source–sink dynamics that emerged from the simulated habitat and population factors. Long‐term differences in births and deaths were quantified for sources and sinks in each system and used in a statistical model to rank the influences of key factors. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and that experience relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations) are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Strong source–sink dynamics emerged under diverse combinations of factors, suggesting that simple inferences of process from pattern will likely be inadequate to predict and assess the strength of source–sink dynamics. Our results also suggest that it may be more difficult to detect and accurately measure source–sink dynamics in slow‐growing populations, highly variable environments, and where a subtle gradient of habitat quality exists.
The conditions and mechanisms that give rise to source–sink dynamics are poorly understood. To better identify systems in need of careful data collection and management, we use a series of controlled experiments using novel simulation methods to examine factors that incite and drive ecological systems to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and in relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations), are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics, and these systems may require additional consideration to design and implement successful habitat and population management plans.</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Demography Beyond the Population</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Factorial design</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Habitat quality</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>individual‐based model</subject><subject>landscape pattern</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Metapopulations</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Source-sink relationships</subject><subject>source‐sink dynamics</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Subpopulations</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctKAzEYhYMottQufAEZcKOLtplcJxtBStVCwY2uQ5rJaOpcatKpduc7-IY-iRnbShUEs_kT_o_DyTkAHMewH0OIBkYb3EcQiT3QRpDQHuc02d-5t0DX-xkMh0FEID8ELcQEiQWmbSDG5cLZ0lsdqTKNzOv2lTq7NM5HVRb5qnbafLy9e1s-RemqVIXV_ggcZCr3pruZHXB_Nbob3vQmt9fj4eWkpylBopcYlHAshFZTLgilPFEso8k0jTURaSoI5yYhCDFOYUpERrGCAkETJ4JMsSK4Ay7WuvN6WphUm2BY5XLubKHcSlbKyp-b0j7Kh2opCWcxZzgInG0EXPVcG7-QhfXa5LkqTVV7GXPOGGEco_-gMOEiJBfQ01_oLMRUhiQkgpgyFKDG_Pma0q7y3pns23cMZVOfbOqTTX2BPdn96De5LSsAgzXwYnOz-ltJjoYj_CX5CQ49oug</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Heinrichs, Julie A.</creator><creator>Lawler, Joshua J.</creator><creator>Schumaker, Nathan H.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of source–sink dynamics</title><author>Heinrichs, Julie A. ; Lawler, Joshua J. ; Schumaker, Nathan H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-8e287399cab7945578a6f58bd1c49dd9477e84226750d49f53a0920e1894b3a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Demography Beyond the Population</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Factorial design</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Habitat quality</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>individual‐based model</topic><topic>landscape pattern</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Metapopulations</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Source-sink relationships</topic><topic>source‐sink dynamics</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Subpopulations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heinrichs, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Joshua J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumaker, Nathan H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heinrichs, Julie A.</au><au>Lawler, Joshua J.</au><au>Schumaker, Nathan H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of source–sink dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>892</spage><epage>904</epage><pages>892-904</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Summary
Many factors affect the presence and exchange of individuals among subpopulations and influence not only the emergence, but the strength of ensuing source–sink dynamics within metapopulations. Yet their relative contributions remain largely unexplored. To help identify the characteristics of empirical systems that are likely to exhibit strong versus weak source–sink dynamics and inform their differential management, we compared the relative roles of influential factors in strengthening source–sink dynamics. In a series of controlled experiments within a spatially explicit individual‐based model framework, we varied patch quality, patch size, the dispersion of high‐ and low‐quality patches, population growth rates, dispersal distances, and environmental stochasticity in a factorial design. We then recorded source–sink dynamics that emerged from the simulated habitat and population factors. Long‐term differences in births and deaths were quantified for sources and sinks in each system and used in a statistical model to rank the influences of key factors. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and that experience relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations) are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Strong source–sink dynamics emerged under diverse combinations of factors, suggesting that simple inferences of process from pattern will likely be inadequate to predict and assess the strength of source–sink dynamics. Our results also suggest that it may be more difficult to detect and accurately measure source–sink dynamics in slow‐growing populations, highly variable environments, and where a subtle gradient of habitat quality exists.
The conditions and mechanisms that give rise to source–sink dynamics are poorly understood. To better identify systems in need of careful data collection and management, we use a series of controlled experiments using novel simulation methods to examine factors that incite and drive ecological systems to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics. Our results suggest that systems with species capable of rapid growth, occupying habitat patches with more disparate qualities, with interspersed higher‐ and lower‐quality habitats, and in relatively stable environments (i.e., fewer negative perturbations), are more likely to exhibit strong source–sink dynamics, and these systems may require additional consideration to design and implement successful habitat and population management plans.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>26941935</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.2029</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2016-02, Vol.6 (4), p.892-904 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4761763 |
source | PubMed Central Free; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Computer simulation Demography Beyond the Population Dispersal Dispersion Dynamics Factorial design Growth rate Habitat quality Habitats individual‐based model landscape pattern Mathematical models Metapopulations Population (statistical) Population growth Source-sink relationships source‐sink dynamics Statistical models Stochasticity Subpopulations |
title | Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of source–sink dynamics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrinsic%20and%20extrinsic%20drivers%20of%20source%E2%80%93sink%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Heinrichs,%20Julie%20A.&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=892&rft.epage=904&rft.pages=892-904&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.2029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1770879935%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5429-8e287399cab7945578a6f58bd1c49dd9477e84226750d49f53a0920e1894b3a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2035629354&rft_id=info:pmid/26941935&rfr_iscdi=true |