Loading…

Comparison Between Pre-Exhaustion and Traditional Exercise Order on Muscle Activation and Performance in Trained Men

The purpose of this study was to measure the acute effects of pre-exhaustion vs. traditional exercise order on neuromuscular performance and sEMG in trained men. Fourteen young, healthy, resistance trained men (age: 25.5 ± 4.0 years, height: 174.9 ± 4.1 cm, and total body mass: 80.0 ± 11.1 kg) took...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sports science & medicine 2016-03, Vol.15 (1), p.111-117
Main Authors: Soares, Enrico Gori, Brown, Lee E, Gomes, Willy Andrade, Corrêa, Daniel Alves, Serpa, Érica Paes, da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas, Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela, Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi, Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha, Lopes, Charles Ricardo, Marchetti, Paulo Henrique
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 117
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Journal of sports science & medicine
container_volume 15
creator Soares, Enrico Gori
Brown, Lee E
Gomes, Willy Andrade
Corrêa, Daniel Alves
Serpa, Érica Paes
da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas
Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela
Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi
Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
Marchetti, Paulo Henrique
description The purpose of this study was to measure the acute effects of pre-exhaustion vs. traditional exercise order on neuromuscular performance and sEMG in trained men. Fourteen young, healthy, resistance trained men (age: 25.5 ± 4.0 years, height: 174.9 ± 4.1 cm, and total body mass: 80.0 ± 11.1 kg) took part of this study. All tests were randomized and counterbalanced for all subjects and experimental conditions. Volunteers attended one session in the laboratory. First, they performed ten repetition maximum (10RM) tests for each exercise (bench press and triceps pushdown) separately. Secondly, they performed all three conditions at 10RM: pre-test (bench press and triceps pushdown, separately), pre-exhaustion (triceps pushdown+bench press, PE) and traditional (bench press+triceps pushdown, TR), and rested 30 minutes between conditions. Results showed that pre-test was significantly greater than PE (p = 0.031) but not different than TR, for total volume load lifted. There was a significant difference between the pre-test and the time-course of lactate measures (p = 0.07). For bench press muscle activity of the pectoralis major, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). Also, for muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.001, PE: p = 0.005, and TR: p = 0.006). For triceps pushdown, muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). For RPE, there were no significant differences between PE and TR (p = 0.15). Our results suggest that exercise order decreases repetitions performed, however, neuromuscular fatigue, lactate, and RPE are not impacted. The lack of difference in total volume load lifted between PE and TR might explain, at least in part, the similar metabolic and perceptual responses. Key pointsThe effects of different exercise order schemes (e.g. PE and TR) on muscle activity and strength performance indicated that similar responses were observed when comparing these schemes.Strength and conditioning coaches should consider these results when prescribing resistance training programs.The primary target (e.g. muscle group) of the training session should trained first, when fatigue level low, in order to maximize training outcomes.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4763829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A500969381</galeid><sourcerecordid>A500969381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g531t-d1ade6b034fadaa4635d590887d272f89d5591ad19d815c0102f132a5647027a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQdRbK1-BRkQxD6M5M9kkrwI67Ktha1bsD6HdHJnNyWTrMlMXb-9Wax1RwpKHpLc_M7hknOfFMeYIloR2YinB-ej4kVKtwgRxoh4XhyRRjIuKT0uhnnotzraFHz5EYbvAL68ilAtdhs9psHmsvamvI7a2P1Nu3Kxg9jaBOUqGohlJi7H1DooZ-1g7_SD5gpiF2KvfQul9XsL68GUl-BfFs867RK8ut9Piq9ni-v5p2q5Or-Yz5bVmlE8VAZrA80NonWnjdZ1Q5lhEgnBDeGkE9IwJjODpRGYtQgj0mFKNGtqjgjX9KT48Mt3O970YFrwQ9RObaPtdfyhgrZq-uLtRq3Dnap5QwWR2eDdvUEM30ZIg-ptasE57SGMSWFBOUUst_FvlHOCa4m5yOibv9DbMMb8tUkRInNEDPH6D7XWDpT1XcgttntTNWMIyUZSgTP1_hEqLwO9bYOHzub6RHA6EWRmgN2wzmkndfHl83-z4nw5ZavH2DY4B2tQOdf5asq_PeA3oN2wScGN-_FJU_D1YYgP6f2eYfoTsn_pOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2295525074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison Between Pre-Exhaustion and Traditional Exercise Order on Muscle Activation and Performance in Trained Men</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Soares, Enrico Gori ; Brown, Lee E ; Gomes, Willy Andrade ; Corrêa, Daniel Alves ; Serpa, Érica Paes ; da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas ; Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela ; Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi ; Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha ; Lopes, Charles Ricardo ; Marchetti, Paulo Henrique</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, Enrico Gori ; Brown, Lee E ; Gomes, Willy Andrade ; Corrêa, Daniel Alves ; Serpa, Érica Paes ; da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas ; Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela ; Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi ; Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha ; Lopes, Charles Ricardo ; Marchetti, Paulo Henrique</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to measure the acute effects of pre-exhaustion vs. traditional exercise order on neuromuscular performance and sEMG in trained men. Fourteen young, healthy, resistance trained men (age: 25.5 ± 4.0 years, height: 174.9 ± 4.1 cm, and total body mass: 80.0 ± 11.1 kg) took part of this study. All tests were randomized and counterbalanced for all subjects and experimental conditions. Volunteers attended one session in the laboratory. First, they performed ten repetition maximum (10RM) tests for each exercise (bench press and triceps pushdown) separately. Secondly, they performed all three conditions at 10RM: pre-test (bench press and triceps pushdown, separately), pre-exhaustion (triceps pushdown+bench press, PE) and traditional (bench press+triceps pushdown, TR), and rested 30 minutes between conditions. Results showed that pre-test was significantly greater than PE (p = 0.031) but not different than TR, for total volume load lifted. There was a significant difference between the pre-test and the time-course of lactate measures (p = 0.07). For bench press muscle activity of the pectoralis major, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). Also, for muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.001, PE: p = 0.005, and TR: p = 0.006). For triceps pushdown, muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). For RPE, there were no significant differences between PE and TR (p = 0.15). Our results suggest that exercise order decreases repetitions performed, however, neuromuscular fatigue, lactate, and RPE are not impacted. The lack of difference in total volume load lifted between PE and TR might explain, at least in part, the similar metabolic and perceptual responses. Key pointsThe effects of different exercise order schemes (e.g. PE and TR) on muscle activity and strength performance indicated that similar responses were observed when comparing these schemes.Strength and conditioning coaches should consider these results when prescribing resistance training programs.The primary target (e.g. muscle group) of the training session should trained first, when fatigue level low, in order to maximize training outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1303-2968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1303-2968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26957933</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomechanics ; Employment ; Exercise ; Fatigue ; Muscle strength ; Neurophysiology ; Strength training ; Weight training</subject><ispartof>Journal of sports science &amp; medicine, 2016-03, Vol.15 (1), p.111-117</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2295525074/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2295525074?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25733,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771,74872</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957933$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, Enrico Gori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lee E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Willy Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrêa, Daniel Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serpa, Érica Paes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Charles Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Paulo Henrique</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison Between Pre-Exhaustion and Traditional Exercise Order on Muscle Activation and Performance in Trained Men</title><title>Journal of sports science &amp; medicine</title><addtitle>J Sports Sci Med</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to measure the acute effects of pre-exhaustion vs. traditional exercise order on neuromuscular performance and sEMG in trained men. Fourteen young, healthy, resistance trained men (age: 25.5 ± 4.0 years, height: 174.9 ± 4.1 cm, and total body mass: 80.0 ± 11.1 kg) took part of this study. All tests were randomized and counterbalanced for all subjects and experimental conditions. Volunteers attended one session in the laboratory. First, they performed ten repetition maximum (10RM) tests for each exercise (bench press and triceps pushdown) separately. Secondly, they performed all three conditions at 10RM: pre-test (bench press and triceps pushdown, separately), pre-exhaustion (triceps pushdown+bench press, PE) and traditional (bench press+triceps pushdown, TR), and rested 30 minutes between conditions. Results showed that pre-test was significantly greater than PE (p = 0.031) but not different than TR, for total volume load lifted. There was a significant difference between the pre-test and the time-course of lactate measures (p = 0.07). For bench press muscle activity of the pectoralis major, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). Also, for muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.001, PE: p = 0.005, and TR: p = 0.006). For triceps pushdown, muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). For RPE, there were no significant differences between PE and TR (p = 0.15). Our results suggest that exercise order decreases repetitions performed, however, neuromuscular fatigue, lactate, and RPE are not impacted. The lack of difference in total volume load lifted between PE and TR might explain, at least in part, the similar metabolic and perceptual responses. Key pointsThe effects of different exercise order schemes (e.g. PE and TR) on muscle activity and strength performance indicated that similar responses were observed when comparing these schemes.Strength and conditioning coaches should consider these results when prescribing resistance training programs.The primary target (e.g. muscle group) of the training session should trained first, when fatigue level low, in order to maximize training outcomes.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Neurophysiology</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Weight training</subject><issn>1303-2968</issn><issn>1303-2968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQdRbK1-BRkQxD6M5M9kkrwI67Ktha1bsD6HdHJnNyWTrMlMXb-9Wax1RwpKHpLc_M7hknOfFMeYIloR2YinB-ej4kVKtwgRxoh4XhyRRjIuKT0uhnnotzraFHz5EYbvAL68ilAtdhs9psHmsvamvI7a2P1Nu3Kxg9jaBOUqGohlJi7H1DooZ-1g7_SD5gpiF2KvfQul9XsL68GUl-BfFs867RK8ut9Piq9ni-v5p2q5Or-Yz5bVmlE8VAZrA80NonWnjdZ1Q5lhEgnBDeGkE9IwJjODpRGYtQgj0mFKNGtqjgjX9KT48Mt3O970YFrwQ9RObaPtdfyhgrZq-uLtRq3Dnap5QwWR2eDdvUEM30ZIg-ptasE57SGMSWFBOUUst_FvlHOCa4m5yOibv9DbMMb8tUkRInNEDPH6D7XWDpT1XcgttntTNWMIyUZSgTP1_hEqLwO9bYOHzub6RHA6EWRmgN2wzmkndfHl83-z4nw5ZavH2DY4B2tQOdf5asq_PeA3oN2wScGN-_FJU_D1YYgP6f2eYfoTsn_pOQ</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Soares, Enrico Gori</creator><creator>Brown, Lee E</creator><creator>Gomes, Willy Andrade</creator><creator>Corrêa, Daniel Alves</creator><creator>Serpa, Érica Paes</creator><creator>da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas</creator><creator>Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela</creator><creator>Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi</creator><creator>Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha</creator><creator>Lopes, Charles Ricardo</creator><creator>Marchetti, Paulo Henrique</creator><general>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</general><general>Uludag University</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Comparison Between Pre-Exhaustion and Traditional Exercise Order on Muscle Activation and Performance in Trained Men</title><author>Soares, Enrico Gori ; Brown, Lee E ; Gomes, Willy Andrade ; Corrêa, Daniel Alves ; Serpa, Érica Paes ; da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas ; Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela ; Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi ; Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha ; Lopes, Charles Ricardo ; Marchetti, Paulo Henrique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g531t-d1ade6b034fadaa4635d590887d272f89d5591ad19d815c0102f132a5647027a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Neurophysiology</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Weight training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, Enrico Gori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lee E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Willy Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrêa, Daniel Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serpa, Érica Paes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Charles Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Paulo Henrique</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sports science &amp; medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, Enrico Gori</au><au>Brown, Lee E</au><au>Gomes, Willy Andrade</au><au>Corrêa, Daniel Alves</au><au>Serpa, Érica Paes</au><au>da Silva, Josinaldo Jarbas</au><au>Junior, Guanis de Barros Vilela</au><au>Fioravanti, Gustavo Zorzi</au><au>Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha</au><au>Lopes, Charles Ricardo</au><au>Marchetti, Paulo Henrique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison Between Pre-Exhaustion and Traditional Exercise Order on Muscle Activation and Performance in Trained Men</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sports science &amp; medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Sports Sci Med</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>111-117</pages><issn>1303-2968</issn><eissn>1303-2968</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to measure the acute effects of pre-exhaustion vs. traditional exercise order on neuromuscular performance and sEMG in trained men. Fourteen young, healthy, resistance trained men (age: 25.5 ± 4.0 years, height: 174.9 ± 4.1 cm, and total body mass: 80.0 ± 11.1 kg) took part of this study. All tests were randomized and counterbalanced for all subjects and experimental conditions. Volunteers attended one session in the laboratory. First, they performed ten repetition maximum (10RM) tests for each exercise (bench press and triceps pushdown) separately. Secondly, they performed all three conditions at 10RM: pre-test (bench press and triceps pushdown, separately), pre-exhaustion (triceps pushdown+bench press, PE) and traditional (bench press+triceps pushdown, TR), and rested 30 minutes between conditions. Results showed that pre-test was significantly greater than PE (p = 0.031) but not different than TR, for total volume load lifted. There was a significant difference between the pre-test and the time-course of lactate measures (p = 0.07). For bench press muscle activity of the pectoralis major, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). Also, for muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.001, PE: p = 0.005, and TR: p = 0.006). For triceps pushdown, muscle activity of the triceps brachii, the last repetition was significantly greater than the first repetition (pre-test: p = 0.006, PE: p = 0.016, and TR: p = 0.005). For RPE, there were no significant differences between PE and TR (p = 0.15). Our results suggest that exercise order decreases repetitions performed, however, neuromuscular fatigue, lactate, and RPE are not impacted. The lack of difference in total volume load lifted between PE and TR might explain, at least in part, the similar metabolic and perceptual responses. Key pointsThe effects of different exercise order schemes (e.g. PE and TR) on muscle activity and strength performance indicated that similar responses were observed when comparing these schemes.Strength and conditioning coaches should consider these results when prescribing resistance training programs.The primary target (e.g. muscle group) of the training session should trained first, when fatigue level low, in order to maximize training outcomes.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</pub><pmid>26957933</pmid><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1303-2968
ispartof Journal of sports science & medicine, 2016-03, Vol.15 (1), p.111-117
issn 1303-2968
1303-2968
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4763829
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); IngentaConnect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Biomechanics
Employment
Exercise
Fatigue
Muscle strength
Neurophysiology
Strength training
Weight training
title Comparison Between Pre-Exhaustion and Traditional Exercise Order on Muscle Activation and Performance in Trained Men
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A44%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20Between%20Pre-Exhaustion%20and%20Traditional%20Exercise%20Order%20on%20Muscle%20Activation%20and%20Performance%20in%20Trained%20Men&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sports%20science%20&%20medicine&rft.au=Soares,%20Enrico%20Gori&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=111-117&rft.issn=1303-2968&rft.eissn=1303-2968&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA500969381%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g531t-d1ade6b034fadaa4635d590887d272f89d5591ad19d815c0102f132a5647027a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2295525074&rft_id=info:pmid/26957933&rft_galeid=A500969381&rfr_iscdi=true