Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes

Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded repertoire of immunologi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC genomics 2016-02, Vol.17 (145), p.158-158, Article 158
Main Authors: Ryu, Taewoo, Seridi, Loqmane, Moitinho-Silva, Lucas, Oates, Matthew, Liew, Yi Jin, Mavromatis, Charalampos, Wang, Xiaolei, Haywood, Annika, Lafi, Feras F, Kupresanin, Marija, Sougrat, Rachid, Alzahrani, Majed A, Giles, Emily, Ghosheh, Yanal, Schunter, Celia, Baumgarten, Sebastian, Berumen, Michael L, Gao, Xin, Aranda, Manuel, Foret, Sylvain, Gough, Julian, Voolstra, Christian R, Hentschel, Ute, Ravasi, Timothy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Animals
Genome
Genomics
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Microbiota - genetics
Models, Genetic
Molecular mechanics
Molecular Sequence Annotation
Physiological aspects
Porifera - genetics
Porifera - microbiology
Receptors, Scavenger - genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Sponges
Symbiosis
Transcriptome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-87ea5fb3cc24b7625a40c03285bc24a2d4e437ad497fc806d82f5bfde1b9c5ae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-87ea5fb3cc24b7625a40c03285bc24a2d4e437ad497fc806d82f5bfde1b9c5ae3
container_end_page 158
container_issue 145
container_start_page 158
container_title BMC genomics
container_volume 17
creator Ryu, Taewoo
Seridi, Loqmane
Moitinho-Silva, Lucas
Oates, Matthew
Liew, Yi Jin
Mavromatis, Charalampos
Wang, Xiaolei
Haywood, Annika
Lafi, Feras F
Kupresanin, Marija
Sougrat, Rachid
Alzahrani, Majed A
Giles, Emily
Ghosheh, Yanal
Schunter, Celia
Baumgarten, Sebastian
Berumen, Michael L
Gao, Xin
Aranda, Manuel
Foret, Sylvain
Gough, Julian
Voolstra, Christian R
Hentschel, Ute
Ravasi, Timothy
description Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded repertoire of immunological domains, specifically Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich (SRCR)-like domains, compared to X. testudinaria. On the microbial side, metatranscriptome analyses revealed an overrepresentation of potential symbiosis-related domains in X. testudinaria. Our findings provide genomic insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying host-symbiont coevolution and may serve as a roadmap for future hologenome analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4772301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A444728993</galeid><sourcerecordid>A444728993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-87ea5fb3cc24b7625a40c03285bc24a2d4e437ad497fc806d82f5bfde1b9c5ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktP3DAUhS0EKjDtD2BTRWJDF6F-xs4GCdFSkJAq9bG2HOc6GCX2NE54_Pt6OoBmKuSFrevvHF9dH4SOCD4lRFWfE6Gq4iUmVUkFJiXeQQeES1JSUvHdjfM-OkzpDmMiFRXv0D6taloJog7Ql6vYxw5CHKAwwfRPyaciumJ6iMVgRh-gSMsYOkjFg59ui9Y7ByOEqRi8HWPjszC9R3vO9Ak-PO8L9Pvy66-Lq_Lm-7fri_Ob0gqqplJJMMI1zFrKG1lRYTi2mFElmlwxtOXAmTQtr6WzCletok40rgXS1FYYYAt0tvZdzs0Arc1tjKbXy9HnVp90NF5v3wR_q7t4r7mUlGGSDU6eDcb4Z4Y06cEnC31vAsQ5aSIlppSpvBbo-D_0Ls5jntA_iskaK7FBdaYH7YOL-V27MtXnnHNJVV2zTJ2-QeXVQp5iDOB8rm8JPm0JMjPB49SZOSV9_fPHNkvWbP6OlEZwr_MgWK9iotcx0TkmehUTjbPm4-YgXxUvuWB_AaSwtyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773790858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Ryu, Taewoo ; Seridi, Loqmane ; Moitinho-Silva, Lucas ; Oates, Matthew ; Liew, Yi Jin ; Mavromatis, Charalampos ; Wang, Xiaolei ; Haywood, Annika ; Lafi, Feras F ; Kupresanin, Marija ; Sougrat, Rachid ; Alzahrani, Majed A ; Giles, Emily ; Ghosheh, Yanal ; Schunter, Celia ; Baumgarten, Sebastian ; Berumen, Michael L ; Gao, Xin ; Aranda, Manuel ; Foret, Sylvain ; Gough, Julian ; Voolstra, Christian R ; Hentschel, Ute ; Ravasi, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Taewoo ; Seridi, Loqmane ; Moitinho-Silva, Lucas ; Oates, Matthew ; Liew, Yi Jin ; Mavromatis, Charalampos ; Wang, Xiaolei ; Haywood, Annika ; Lafi, Feras F ; Kupresanin, Marija ; Sougrat, Rachid ; Alzahrani, Majed A ; Giles, Emily ; Ghosheh, Yanal ; Schunter, Celia ; Baumgarten, Sebastian ; Berumen, Michael L ; Gao, Xin ; Aranda, Manuel ; Foret, Sylvain ; Gough, Julian ; Voolstra, Christian R ; Hentschel, Ute ; Ravasi, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded repertoire of immunological domains, specifically Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich (SRCR)-like domains, compared to X. testudinaria. On the microbial side, metatranscriptome analyses revealed an overrepresentation of potential symbiosis-related domains in X. testudinaria. Our findings provide genomic insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying host-symbiont coevolution and may serve as a roadmap for future hologenome analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2164</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26926518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animals ; Genome ; Genomics ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Microbiota - genetics ; Models, Genetic ; Molecular mechanics ; Molecular Sequence Annotation ; Physiological aspects ; Porifera - genetics ; Porifera - microbiology ; Receptors, Scavenger - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Sponges ; Symbiosis ; Transcriptome</subject><ispartof>BMC genomics, 2016-02, Vol.17 (145), p.158-158, Article 158</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>Ryu et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-87ea5fb3cc24b7625a40c03285bc24a2d4e437ad497fc806d82f5bfde1b9c5ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-87ea5fb3cc24b7625a40c03285bc24a2d4e437ad497fc806d82f5bfde1b9c5ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772301/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1773790858?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,25736,27907,27908,36995,36996,44573,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Taewoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seridi, Loqmane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moitinho-Silva, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Yi Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Charalampos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaolei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafi, Feras F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kupresanin, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sougrat, Rachid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Majed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosheh, Yanal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunter, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berumen, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foret, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gough, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voolstra, Christian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravasi, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes</title><title>BMC genomics</title><addtitle>BMC Genomics</addtitle><description>Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded repertoire of immunological domains, specifically Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich (SRCR)-like domains, compared to X. testudinaria. On the microbial side, metatranscriptome analyses revealed an overrepresentation of potential symbiosis-related domains in X. testudinaria. Our findings provide genomic insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying host-symbiont coevolution and may serve as a roadmap for future hologenome analyses.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Microbiota - genetics</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Molecular mechanics</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Annotation</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Porifera - genetics</subject><subject>Porifera - microbiology</subject><subject>Receptors, Scavenger - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Sponges</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Transcriptome</subject><issn>1471-2164</issn><issn>1471-2164</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktP3DAUhS0EKjDtD2BTRWJDF6F-xs4GCdFSkJAq9bG2HOc6GCX2NE54_Pt6OoBmKuSFrevvHF9dH4SOCD4lRFWfE6Gq4iUmVUkFJiXeQQeES1JSUvHdjfM-OkzpDmMiFRXv0D6taloJog7Ql6vYxw5CHKAwwfRPyaciumJ6iMVgRh-gSMsYOkjFg59ui9Y7ByOEqRi8HWPjszC9R3vO9Ak-PO8L9Pvy66-Lq_Lm-7fri_Ob0gqqplJJMMI1zFrKG1lRYTi2mFElmlwxtOXAmTQtr6WzCletok40rgXS1FYYYAt0tvZdzs0Arc1tjKbXy9HnVp90NF5v3wR_q7t4r7mUlGGSDU6eDcb4Z4Y06cEnC31vAsQ5aSIlppSpvBbo-D_0Ls5jntA_iskaK7FBdaYH7YOL-V27MtXnnHNJVV2zTJ2-QeXVQp5iDOB8rm8JPm0JMjPB49SZOSV9_fPHNkvWbP6OlEZwr_MgWK9iotcx0TkmehUTjbPm4-YgXxUvuWB_AaSwtyw</recordid><startdate>20160229</startdate><enddate>20160229</enddate><creator>Ryu, Taewoo</creator><creator>Seridi, Loqmane</creator><creator>Moitinho-Silva, Lucas</creator><creator>Oates, Matthew</creator><creator>Liew, Yi Jin</creator><creator>Mavromatis, Charalampos</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaolei</creator><creator>Haywood, Annika</creator><creator>Lafi, Feras F</creator><creator>Kupresanin, Marija</creator><creator>Sougrat, Rachid</creator><creator>Alzahrani, Majed A</creator><creator>Giles, Emily</creator><creator>Ghosheh, Yanal</creator><creator>Schunter, Celia</creator><creator>Baumgarten, Sebastian</creator><creator>Berumen, Michael L</creator><creator>Gao, Xin</creator><creator>Aranda, Manuel</creator><creator>Foret, Sylvain</creator><creator>Gough, Julian</creator><creator>Voolstra, Christian R</creator><creator>Hentschel, Ute</creator><creator>Ravasi, Timothy</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160229</creationdate><title>Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes</title><author>Ryu, Taewoo ; Seridi, Loqmane ; Moitinho-Silva, Lucas ; Oates, Matthew ; Liew, Yi Jin ; Mavromatis, Charalampos ; Wang, Xiaolei ; Haywood, Annika ; Lafi, Feras F ; Kupresanin, Marija ; Sougrat, Rachid ; Alzahrani, Majed A ; Giles, Emily ; Ghosheh, Yanal ; Schunter, Celia ; Baumgarten, Sebastian ; Berumen, Michael L ; Gao, Xin ; Aranda, Manuel ; Foret, Sylvain ; Gough, Julian ; Voolstra, Christian R ; Hentschel, Ute ; Ravasi, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-87ea5fb3cc24b7625a40c03285bc24a2d4e437ad497fc806d82f5bfde1b9c5ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Microbiota - genetics</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Molecular mechanics</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Annotation</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Porifera - genetics</topic><topic>Porifera - microbiology</topic><topic>Receptors, Scavenger - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Sponges</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Transcriptome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Taewoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seridi, Loqmane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moitinho-Silva, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Yi Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Charalampos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaolei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafi, Feras F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kupresanin, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sougrat, Rachid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Majed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosheh, Yanal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunter, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgarten, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berumen, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foret, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gough, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voolstra, Christian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravasi, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC genomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryu, Taewoo</au><au>Seridi, Loqmane</au><au>Moitinho-Silva, Lucas</au><au>Oates, Matthew</au><au>Liew, Yi Jin</au><au>Mavromatis, Charalampos</au><au>Wang, Xiaolei</au><au>Haywood, Annika</au><au>Lafi, Feras F</au><au>Kupresanin, Marija</au><au>Sougrat, Rachid</au><au>Alzahrani, Majed A</au><au>Giles, Emily</au><au>Ghosheh, Yanal</au><au>Schunter, Celia</au><au>Baumgarten, Sebastian</au><au>Berumen, Michael L</au><au>Gao, Xin</au><au>Aranda, Manuel</au><au>Foret, Sylvain</au><au>Gough, Julian</au><au>Voolstra, Christian R</au><au>Hentschel, Ute</au><au>Ravasi, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes</atitle><jtitle>BMC genomics</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Genomics</addtitle><date>2016-02-29</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>145</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>158-158</pages><artnum>158</artnum><issn>1471-2164</issn><eissn>1471-2164</eissn><abstract>Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded repertoire of immunological domains, specifically Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich (SRCR)-like domains, compared to X. testudinaria. On the microbial side, metatranscriptome analyses revealed an overrepresentation of potential symbiosis-related domains in X. testudinaria. Our findings provide genomic insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying host-symbiont coevolution and may serve as a roadmap for future hologenome analyses.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26926518</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2164
ispartof BMC genomics, 2016-02, Vol.17 (145), p.158-158, Article 158
issn 1471-2164
1471-2164
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4772301
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Analysis
Animals
Genome
Genomics
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Microbiota - genetics
Models, Genetic
Molecular mechanics
Molecular Sequence Annotation
Physiological aspects
Porifera - genetics
Porifera - microbiology
Receptors, Scavenger - genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Sponges
Symbiosis
Transcriptome
title Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A48%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hologenome%20analysis%20of%20two%20marine%20sponges%20with%20different%20microbiomes&rft.jtitle=BMC%20genomics&rft.au=Ryu,%20Taewoo&rft.date=2016-02-29&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=145&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=158-158&rft.artnum=158&rft.issn=1471-2164&rft.eissn=1471-2164&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA444728993%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-87ea5fb3cc24b7625a40c03285bc24a2d4e437ad497fc806d82f5bfde1b9c5ae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773790858&rft_id=info:pmid/26926518&rft_galeid=A444728993&rfr_iscdi=true