Critical thinking dispositions of nursing students in Asian and non-Asian countries: a literature review

• Published in: Global journal of health science 2013-09, Vol.5 (6), p.172-178
• Main Authors: Salsali, Mahvash, Tajvidi, Mansooreh, Ghiyasvandian, Shahrzad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Asia; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Educational Measurement; Humans; Students, Nursing - psychology; Teaching; Thinking
• ISSN: 1916-9736; 1916-9744
• DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n6p172

Critical thinking disposition represents an inclination of a person to use possessed skills in relation to critical thinking. The trend of critical thinking has been described as inner motivation to solve problems and make decisions by thinking. In nursing as a practical profession, the concept of critical thinking dispositions is important component in helping to manage complex health situations and to deal with patient issues effectively. Willingness to think critically is a prerequisite for safe and subtly performance. The results of studies show critical thinking dispositions of nursing students in Asian countries are different from non-Asian countries. Aim of this literature review was to compare critical thinking dispositions of nursing students in Asian and non-Asian countries. Literature review was done in English and Persian databases. The results showed of the 795 articles published in English and Persian language that studied critical thinking, 73 ones studied critical thinking skills and dispositions in nursing education, and relationship between teaching methods and critical thinking skills and dispositions in nursing education of different countries. Fifteen of seventy three articles assessed critical thinking dispositions in nursing students. Limited studies showed that the Asian nursing students had mostly undermining score of the critical thinking dispositions, while non-Asian countries tend to positive scores. The reasons for these differences could be due to issues such as environmental, educational methods and cultural differences. However, future studies should measure critical thinking disposition by discipline-based tools.