Loading…

When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. leads to loss of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon

In Cameroon, insecticide resistance in Anopheles (An.) gambiae s.l. has been reported in several foci, prompting further investigations on associated patterns of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) bio-efficacy. The current study, conducted from June to August 2011, explored the intensity of delt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Parasites & vectors 2016-03, Vol.9 (131), p.132, Article 132
Main Authors: Etang, Josiane, Pennetier, Cédric, Piameu, Michael, Bouraima, Aziz, Chandre, Fabrice, Awono-Ambene, Parfait, Marc, Coosemans, Corbel, Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-45b3c92f753efe8fb82e173cd6f59e0974d249d8a71cf82ef651eaaab2c76eda3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-45b3c92f753efe8fb82e173cd6f59e0974d249d8a71cf82ef651eaaab2c76eda3
container_end_page
container_issue 131
container_start_page 132
container_title Parasites & vectors
container_volume 9
creator Etang, Josiane
Pennetier, Cédric
Piameu, Michael
Bouraima, Aziz
Chandre, Fabrice
Awono-Ambene, Parfait
Marc, Coosemans
Corbel, Vincent
description In Cameroon, insecticide resistance in Anopheles (An.) gambiae s.l. has been reported in several foci, prompting further investigations on associated patterns of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) bio-efficacy. The current study, conducted from June to August 2011, explored the intensity of deltamethrin resistance in An. gambiae s.l. from Pitoa and its impact on the residual bio-efficacy of LifeNet, a LLIN with deltamethrin incorporated into polypropylene nets (PND). Two-four days old females An. gambiae s.l. reared from larval collections in Pitoa were tested for susceptibility to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, using standard World Health Organization (WHO) tube assays. Intensity of deltamethrin resistance was explored using WHO tube assays, but across six working concentrations from 0.001 % to 0.5 %. Bio-efficacy of unwashed and washed PND was assessed using WHO cone test. Species identification and kdr 1014 genotyping were performed on mosquito samples that were not exposed to insecticides, using PCR-RFLP and HOLA methods respectively. The Kisumu reference susceptible strain of An. gambiae s.s. was used for comparisons. A total of 1895 An. gambiae s.l. specimens from Pitoa were used for resistance and PND bio-efficacy testing. This mosquito population was resistant to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, with 18-40 min knockdown times for 50 % of tested mosquitoes and 59-77 % mortality. Deltamethrin Resistance Ratio compared with the Kisumu strain was estimated at ≥500 fold. LifeNets were effective against the susceptible Kisumu (100 % knockdown (KD60min) and mortality) and the resistant Pitoa samples (95 % KD60min, 83-95 % mortality). However, the bio-efficacy gradually dropped against the Pitoa samples when nets were washed (X (2) = 35.887, df = 8, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13071-016-1420-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4782322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A445515775</galeid><sourcerecordid>A445515775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-45b3c92f753efe8fb82e173cd6f59e0974d249d8a71cf82ef651eaaab2c76eda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk2P0zAQjRCIXQo_gAuyxGkPKbYTxwkHpKoCtlIEEh_iaDnOuPEqsYvtrtp_w0_FUZdli9Acxpp5742fPVn2kuAlIXX1JpACc5JjUuWkpDg_PMouCWdVXhSYPX5wvsiehXCDcYUbVj3NLmjVsNSsL7NfPwawyNgINph4RE6jHsYoJ4iDNxZ5CCZEaRUkEFpZtxtghIC2cuqMBBSW4xKNIPuAokOjC2GWaJ3dolaGaFLe2AAqGmV6OaJPEAPqjMtBa6OkOr5FEikZklLc98d5iHU-DmidruCds8-zJ1qOAV7c5UX2_cP7b-vrvP38cbNetbliFY15ybpCNVRzVoCGWnc1BcIL1VeaNYAbXva0bPpacqJ06umKEZBSdlTxCnpZLLJ3J93dvpugV2Cjl6PYeTNJfxROGnHesWYQW3crSl7TgtIkcHUSGP6hXa9aMdcwaTjDnN-ShH19N8y7n3sIUdy4vbfJnyC8maOhzV_UVo4gjNUuDVaTCUqsypIxwniyu8iW_0Gl6GEyylnQJtXPCFdnhISJcIhbuQ9BbL5-OceSE1b59LUe9L0zgsW8g-K0g8lcJeYdFIfEefXwJe8Zf5au-A3g-tiH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797979929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. leads to loss of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Etang, Josiane ; Pennetier, Cédric ; Piameu, Michael ; Bouraima, Aziz ; Chandre, Fabrice ; Awono-Ambene, Parfait ; Marc, Coosemans ; Corbel, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Etang, Josiane ; Pennetier, Cédric ; Piameu, Michael ; Bouraima, Aziz ; Chandre, Fabrice ; Awono-Ambene, Parfait ; Marc, Coosemans ; Corbel, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>In Cameroon, insecticide resistance in Anopheles (An.) gambiae s.l. has been reported in several foci, prompting further investigations on associated patterns of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) bio-efficacy. The current study, conducted from June to August 2011, explored the intensity of deltamethrin resistance in An. gambiae s.l. from Pitoa and its impact on the residual bio-efficacy of LifeNet, a LLIN with deltamethrin incorporated into polypropylene nets (PND). Two-four days old females An. gambiae s.l. reared from larval collections in Pitoa were tested for susceptibility to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, using standard World Health Organization (WHO) tube assays. Intensity of deltamethrin resistance was explored using WHO tube assays, but across six working concentrations from 0.001 % to 0.5 %. Bio-efficacy of unwashed and washed PND was assessed using WHO cone test. Species identification and kdr 1014 genotyping were performed on mosquito samples that were not exposed to insecticides, using PCR-RFLP and HOLA methods respectively. The Kisumu reference susceptible strain of An. gambiae s.s. was used for comparisons. A total of 1895 An. gambiae s.l. specimens from Pitoa were used for resistance and PND bio-efficacy testing. This mosquito population was resistant to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, with 18-40 min knockdown times for 50 % of tested mosquitoes and 59-77 % mortality. Deltamethrin Resistance Ratio compared with the Kisumu strain was estimated at ≥500 fold. LifeNets were effective against the susceptible Kisumu (100 % knockdown (KD60min) and mortality) and the resistant Pitoa samples (95 % KD60min, 83-95 % mortality). However, the bio-efficacy gradually dropped against the Pitoa samples when nets were washed (X (2) = 35.887, df = 8, p &lt; 0.001), and fell under the WHO efficacy threshold (80 % mortality and/or 95 % KD60min) between 10 and 15 washes. The Pitoa samples were composed of three sibling species: An. arabiensis (132/154, 86 %), An. coluzzii (19/154, 12 %) and An. gambiae s.s. (3/154, 2 %). The kdr L1014F allele was found only in An. coluzzii (Npositive = 13/19), at 34 % frequency and heterozygote stage. No specimen carried the kdr L1014S allele. The current study showed that LifeNet might still offer some protection against the resistant An. gambiae s.l. population from Pitoa, provided appropriate dose of insecticide is available on the nets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1420-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26951758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal biology ; Animals ; Anopheles ; Anopheles - drug effects ; Anopheles - genetics ; Biological Assay ; Cameroon ; Control ; DDT - pharmacology ; Demographic aspects ; Genotype ; Genotyping Techniques ; Insecticide Resistance ; Insecticide-Treated Bednets ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - pharmacology ; Invertebrate Zoology ; Life Sciences ; Malaria ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Nitriles - pharmacology ; Parasitology ; Permethrin - pharmacology ; Pesticide resistance ; Physiological aspects ; Pyrethrins - pharmacology ; Risk factors ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Parasites &amp; vectors, 2016-03, Vol.9 (131), p.132, Article 132</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Etang et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-45b3c92f753efe8fb82e173cd6f59e0974d249d8a71cf82ef651eaaab2c76eda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-45b3c92f753efe8fb82e173cd6f59e0974d249d8a71cf82ef651eaaab2c76eda3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1994-9705 ; 0000-0002-3362-6371</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782322/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1797979929?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-01975077$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etang, Josiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennetier, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piameu, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouraima, Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandre, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awono-Ambene, Parfait</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marc, Coosemans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbel, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. leads to loss of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon</title><title>Parasites &amp; vectors</title><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><description>In Cameroon, insecticide resistance in Anopheles (An.) gambiae s.l. has been reported in several foci, prompting further investigations on associated patterns of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) bio-efficacy. The current study, conducted from June to August 2011, explored the intensity of deltamethrin resistance in An. gambiae s.l. from Pitoa and its impact on the residual bio-efficacy of LifeNet, a LLIN with deltamethrin incorporated into polypropylene nets (PND). Two-four days old females An. gambiae s.l. reared from larval collections in Pitoa were tested for susceptibility to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, using standard World Health Organization (WHO) tube assays. Intensity of deltamethrin resistance was explored using WHO tube assays, but across six working concentrations from 0.001 % to 0.5 %. Bio-efficacy of unwashed and washed PND was assessed using WHO cone test. Species identification and kdr 1014 genotyping were performed on mosquito samples that were not exposed to insecticides, using PCR-RFLP and HOLA methods respectively. The Kisumu reference susceptible strain of An. gambiae s.s. was used for comparisons. A total of 1895 An. gambiae s.l. specimens from Pitoa were used for resistance and PND bio-efficacy testing. This mosquito population was resistant to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, with 18-40 min knockdown times for 50 % of tested mosquitoes and 59-77 % mortality. Deltamethrin Resistance Ratio compared with the Kisumu strain was estimated at ≥500 fold. LifeNets were effective against the susceptible Kisumu (100 % knockdown (KD60min) and mortality) and the resistant Pitoa samples (95 % KD60min, 83-95 % mortality). However, the bio-efficacy gradually dropped against the Pitoa samples when nets were washed (X (2) = 35.887, df = 8, p &lt; 0.001), and fell under the WHO efficacy threshold (80 % mortality and/or 95 % KD60min) between 10 and 15 washes. The Pitoa samples were composed of three sibling species: An. arabiensis (132/154, 86 %), An. coluzzii (19/154, 12 %) and An. gambiae s.s. (3/154, 2 %). The kdr L1014F allele was found only in An. coluzzii (Npositive = 13/19), at 34 % frequency and heterozygote stage. No specimen carried the kdr L1014S allele. The current study showed that LifeNet might still offer some protection against the resistant An. gambiae s.l. population from Pitoa, provided appropriate dose of insecticide is available on the nets.</description><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anopheles</subject><subject>Anopheles - drug effects</subject><subject>Anopheles - genetics</subject><subject>Biological Assay</subject><subject>Cameroon</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>DDT - pharmacology</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotyping Techniques</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance</subject><subject>Insecticide-Treated Bednets</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Invertebrate Zoology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Nitriles - pharmacology</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Permethrin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pesticide resistance</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>1756-3305</issn><issn>1756-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk2P0zAQjRCIXQo_gAuyxGkPKbYTxwkHpKoCtlIEEh_iaDnOuPEqsYvtrtp_w0_FUZdli9Acxpp5742fPVn2kuAlIXX1JpACc5JjUuWkpDg_PMouCWdVXhSYPX5wvsiehXCDcYUbVj3NLmjVsNSsL7NfPwawyNgINph4RE6jHsYoJ4iDNxZ5CCZEaRUkEFpZtxtghIC2cuqMBBSW4xKNIPuAokOjC2GWaJ3dolaGaFLe2AAqGmV6OaJPEAPqjMtBa6OkOr5FEikZklLc98d5iHU-DmidruCds8-zJ1qOAV7c5UX2_cP7b-vrvP38cbNetbliFY15ybpCNVRzVoCGWnc1BcIL1VeaNYAbXva0bPpacqJ06umKEZBSdlTxCnpZLLJ3J93dvpugV2Cjl6PYeTNJfxROGnHesWYQW3crSl7TgtIkcHUSGP6hXa9aMdcwaTjDnN-ShH19N8y7n3sIUdy4vbfJnyC8maOhzV_UVo4gjNUuDVaTCUqsypIxwniyu8iW_0Gl6GEyylnQJtXPCFdnhISJcIhbuQ9BbL5-OceSE1b59LUe9L0zgsW8g-K0g8lcJeYdFIfEefXwJe8Zf5au-A3g-tiH</recordid><startdate>20160308</startdate><enddate>20160308</enddate><creator>Etang, Josiane</creator><creator>Pennetier, Cédric</creator><creator>Piameu, Michael</creator><creator>Bouraima, Aziz</creator><creator>Chandre, Fabrice</creator><creator>Awono-Ambene, Parfait</creator><creator>Marc, Coosemans</creator><creator>Corbel, Vincent</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3362-6371</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160308</creationdate><title>When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. leads to loss of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon</title><author>Etang, Josiane ; Pennetier, Cédric ; Piameu, Michael ; Bouraima, Aziz ; Chandre, Fabrice ; Awono-Ambene, Parfait ; Marc, Coosemans ; Corbel, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-45b3c92f753efe8fb82e173cd6f59e0974d249d8a71cf82ef651eaaab2c76eda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anopheles</topic><topic>Anopheles - drug effects</topic><topic>Anopheles - genetics</topic><topic>Biological Assay</topic><topic>Cameroon</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>DDT - pharmacology</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotyping Techniques</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance</topic><topic>Insecticide-Treated Bednets</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Invertebrate Zoology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Nitriles - pharmacology</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Permethrin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pesticide resistance</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etang, Josiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennetier, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piameu, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouraima, Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandre, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awono-Ambene, Parfait</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marc, Coosemans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbel, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etang, Josiane</au><au>Pennetier, Cédric</au><au>Piameu, Michael</au><au>Bouraima, Aziz</au><au>Chandre, Fabrice</au><au>Awono-Ambene, Parfait</au><au>Marc, Coosemans</au><au>Corbel, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. leads to loss of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon</atitle><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><date>2016-03-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>131</issue><spage>132</spage><pages>132-</pages><artnum>132</artnum><issn>1756-3305</issn><eissn>1756-3305</eissn><abstract>In Cameroon, insecticide resistance in Anopheles (An.) gambiae s.l. has been reported in several foci, prompting further investigations on associated patterns of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) bio-efficacy. The current study, conducted from June to August 2011, explored the intensity of deltamethrin resistance in An. gambiae s.l. from Pitoa and its impact on the residual bio-efficacy of LifeNet, a LLIN with deltamethrin incorporated into polypropylene nets (PND). Two-four days old females An. gambiae s.l. reared from larval collections in Pitoa were tested for susceptibility to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, using standard World Health Organization (WHO) tube assays. Intensity of deltamethrin resistance was explored using WHO tube assays, but across six working concentrations from 0.001 % to 0.5 %. Bio-efficacy of unwashed and washed PND was assessed using WHO cone test. Species identification and kdr 1014 genotyping were performed on mosquito samples that were not exposed to insecticides, using PCR-RFLP and HOLA methods respectively. The Kisumu reference susceptible strain of An. gambiae s.s. was used for comparisons. A total of 1895 An. gambiae s.l. specimens from Pitoa were used for resistance and PND bio-efficacy testing. This mosquito population was resistant to DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, with 18-40 min knockdown times for 50 % of tested mosquitoes and 59-77 % mortality. Deltamethrin Resistance Ratio compared with the Kisumu strain was estimated at ≥500 fold. LifeNets were effective against the susceptible Kisumu (100 % knockdown (KD60min) and mortality) and the resistant Pitoa samples (95 % KD60min, 83-95 % mortality). However, the bio-efficacy gradually dropped against the Pitoa samples when nets were washed (X (2) = 35.887, df = 8, p &lt; 0.001), and fell under the WHO efficacy threshold (80 % mortality and/or 95 % KD60min) between 10 and 15 washes. The Pitoa samples were composed of three sibling species: An. arabiensis (132/154, 86 %), An. coluzzii (19/154, 12 %) and An. gambiae s.s. (3/154, 2 %). The kdr L1014F allele was found only in An. coluzzii (Npositive = 13/19), at 34 % frequency and heterozygote stage. No specimen carried the kdr L1014S allele. The current study showed that LifeNet might still offer some protection against the resistant An. gambiae s.l. population from Pitoa, provided appropriate dose of insecticide is available on the nets.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26951758</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13071-016-1420-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3362-6371</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1756-3305
ispartof Parasites & vectors, 2016-03, Vol.9 (131), p.132, Article 132
issn 1756-3305
1756-3305
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4782322
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Animal biology
Animals
Anopheles
Anopheles - drug effects
Anopheles - genetics
Biological Assay
Cameroon
Control
DDT - pharmacology
Demographic aspects
Genotype
Genotyping Techniques
Insecticide Resistance
Insecticide-Treated Bednets
Insecticides
Insecticides - pharmacology
Invertebrate Zoology
Life Sciences
Malaria
Microbiology and Parasitology
Nitriles - pharmacology
Parasitology
Permethrin - pharmacology
Pesticide resistance
Physiological aspects
Pyrethrins - pharmacology
Risk factors
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Survival Analysis
title When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. leads to loss of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A47%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20intensity%20of%20deltamethrin%20resistance%20in%20Anopheles%20gambiae%20s.l.%20leads%20to%20loss%20of%20Long%20Lasting%20Insecticidal%20Nets%20bio-efficacy:%20a%20case%20study%20in%20north%20Cameroon&rft.jtitle=Parasites%20&%20vectors&rft.au=Etang,%20Josiane&rft.date=2016-03-08&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=131&rft.spage=132&rft.pages=132-&rft.artnum=132&rft.issn=1756-3305&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13071-016-1420-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA445515775%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-45b3c92f753efe8fb82e173cd6f59e0974d249d8a71cf82ef651eaaab2c76eda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797979929&rft_id=info:pmid/26951758&rft_galeid=A445515775&rfr_iscdi=true