Loading…
Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review
Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) refers to collaboration between researchers and decision-makers. While advocated as an approach for enhancing the relevance and use of research, IKT is challenging and inconsistently applied. This study sought to inform future IKT practice and research by synth...
Saved in:
Published in: | Implementation science : IS 2016-03, Vol.11 (38), p.38-38, Article 38 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-af0bbc76c8c46e591caa9edbd49771bf79e070a155c0fe9bbd32987fcd0d25473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-af0bbc76c8c46e591caa9edbd49771bf79e070a155c0fe9bbd32987fcd0d25473 |
container_end_page | 38 |
container_issue | 38 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Implementation science : IS |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Gagliardi, Anna R Berta, Whitney Kothari, Anita Boyko, Jennifer Urquhart, Robin |
description | Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) refers to collaboration between researchers and decision-makers. While advocated as an approach for enhancing the relevance and use of research, IKT is challenging and inconsistently applied. This study sought to inform future IKT practice and research by synthesizing studies that empirically evaluated IKT and identifying knowledge gaps.
We performed a scoping review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2014 for English language studies that evaluated IKT interventions involving researchers and organizational or policy-level decision-makers. Data were extracted on study characteristics, IKT intervention (theory, content, mode, duration, frequency, personnel, participants, timing from initiation, initiator, source of funding, decision-maker involvement), and enablers, barriers, and outcomes reported by studies. We performed content analysis and reported summary statistics.
Thirteen studies were eligible after screening 14,754 titles and reviewing 106 full-text studies. Details about IKT activities were poorly reported, and none were formally based on theory. Studies varied in the number and type of interactions between researchers and decision-makers; meetings were the most common format. All studies reported barriers and facilitators. Studies reported a range of positive and sub-optimal outcomes. Outcomes did not appear to be associated with initiator of the partnership, dedicated funding, partnership maturity, nature of decision-maker involvement, presence or absence of enablers or barriers, or the number of different IKT activities.
The IKT strategies that achieve beneficial outcomes remain unknown. We generated a summary of IKT approaches, enablers, barriers, conditions, and outcomes that can serve as the basis for a future review or for planning ongoing primary research. Future research can contribute to three identified knowledge gaps by examining (1) how different IKT strategies influence outcomes, (2) the relationship between the logic or theory underlying IKT interventions and beneficial outcomes, and (3) when and how decision-makers should be involved in the research process. Future IKT initiatives should more systematically plan and document their design and implementation, and evaluations should report the findings with sufficient detail to reveal how IKT was associated with outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13012-016-0399-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4797171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453873854</galeid><sourcerecordid>A453873854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-af0bbc76c8c46e591caa9edbd49771bf79e070a155c0fe9bbd32987fcd0d25473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFPHCEUxkljo9b6B_RiSHqxh7EwAwN4MDHG2k1NerFnwsCbWXQWVpjV-N_LdrdGG8MBAr_3vffxIfSFkhNKZfs904bQuiK0rUijVEU_oH0qmKy4InLn1XkPfcr5lhDGWdvsor26VVISQvbR1SxMMCQzgcN3IT6O4AbAUzIhj2byMeDj2a-bb9gHPAczTnNsTYJTbHC2cenDgBM8eHj8jD72ZsxwuN0P0J8flzcXP6vr31ezi_PryjLFpsr0pOusaK20rAWuqDVGgescU0LQrhcKiCCGcm5JD6rrXFMrKXrriKs5E80BOtvoLlfdApyFUGYd9TL5hUlPOhqv374EP9dDfNBMKEEFLQLHW4EU71eQJ73w2cI4mgBxlTUVgvGGU6YK-vU_9DauUij2CqWEInX7d6ItNZgRtA99LH3tWlSfFyUpGslZoU7eocpysPA2Buh9uX9TQDcFNsWcE_QvHinR6_T1Jn1d0tfr9PXa29Hrz3mp-Bd38wygkKl5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797902647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Gagliardi, Anna R ; Berta, Whitney ; Kothari, Anita ; Boyko, Jennifer ; Urquhart, Robin</creator><creatorcontrib>Gagliardi, Anna R ; Berta, Whitney ; Kothari, Anita ; Boyko, Jennifer ; Urquhart, Robin</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) refers to collaboration between researchers and decision-makers. While advocated as an approach for enhancing the relevance and use of research, IKT is challenging and inconsistently applied. This study sought to inform future IKT practice and research by synthesizing studies that empirically evaluated IKT and identifying knowledge gaps.
We performed a scoping review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2014 for English language studies that evaluated IKT interventions involving researchers and organizational or policy-level decision-makers. Data were extracted on study characteristics, IKT intervention (theory, content, mode, duration, frequency, personnel, participants, timing from initiation, initiator, source of funding, decision-maker involvement), and enablers, barriers, and outcomes reported by studies. We performed content analysis and reported summary statistics.
Thirteen studies were eligible after screening 14,754 titles and reviewing 106 full-text studies. Details about IKT activities were poorly reported, and none were formally based on theory. Studies varied in the number and type of interactions between researchers and decision-makers; meetings were the most common format. All studies reported barriers and facilitators. Studies reported a range of positive and sub-optimal outcomes. Outcomes did not appear to be associated with initiator of the partnership, dedicated funding, partnership maturity, nature of decision-maker involvement, presence or absence of enablers or barriers, or the number of different IKT activities.
The IKT strategies that achieve beneficial outcomes remain unknown. We generated a summary of IKT approaches, enablers, barriers, conditions, and outcomes that can serve as the basis for a future review or for planning ongoing primary research. Future research can contribute to three identified knowledge gaps by examining (1) how different IKT strategies influence outcomes, (2) the relationship between the logic or theory underlying IKT interventions and beneficial outcomes, and (3) when and how decision-makers should be involved in the research process. Future IKT initiatives should more systematically plan and document their design and implementation, and evaluations should report the findings with sufficient detail to reveal how IKT was associated with outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-5908</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5908</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0399-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26988000</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Content analysis ; Decision Making ; Delivery of Health Care ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Funding ; Health Planning ; Health Services ; Humans ; Patient education ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Social workers ; Studies ; Systematic Review ; Translational Medical Research - organization & administration</subject><ispartof>Implementation science : IS, 2016-03, Vol.11 (38), p.38-38, Article 38</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>Gagliardi et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-af0bbc76c8c46e591caa9edbd49771bf79e070a155c0fe9bbd32987fcd0d25473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-af0bbc76c8c46e591caa9edbd49771bf79e070a155c0fe9bbd32987fcd0d25473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797171/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1797902647?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26988000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gagliardi, Anna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berta, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothari, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyko, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquhart, Robin</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review</title><title>Implementation science : IS</title><addtitle>Implement Sci</addtitle><description>Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) refers to collaboration between researchers and decision-makers. While advocated as an approach for enhancing the relevance and use of research, IKT is challenging and inconsistently applied. This study sought to inform future IKT practice and research by synthesizing studies that empirically evaluated IKT and identifying knowledge gaps.
We performed a scoping review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2014 for English language studies that evaluated IKT interventions involving researchers and organizational or policy-level decision-makers. Data were extracted on study characteristics, IKT intervention (theory, content, mode, duration, frequency, personnel, participants, timing from initiation, initiator, source of funding, decision-maker involvement), and enablers, barriers, and outcomes reported by studies. We performed content analysis and reported summary statistics.
Thirteen studies were eligible after screening 14,754 titles and reviewing 106 full-text studies. Details about IKT activities were poorly reported, and none were formally based on theory. Studies varied in the number and type of interactions between researchers and decision-makers; meetings were the most common format. All studies reported barriers and facilitators. Studies reported a range of positive and sub-optimal outcomes. Outcomes did not appear to be associated with initiator of the partnership, dedicated funding, partnership maturity, nature of decision-maker involvement, presence or absence of enablers or barriers, or the number of different IKT activities.
The IKT strategies that achieve beneficial outcomes remain unknown. We generated a summary of IKT approaches, enablers, barriers, conditions, and outcomes that can serve as the basis for a future review or for planning ongoing primary research. Future research can contribute to three identified knowledge gaps by examining (1) how different IKT strategies influence outcomes, (2) the relationship between the logic or theory underlying IKT interventions and beneficial outcomes, and (3) when and how decision-makers should be involved in the research process. Future IKT initiatives should more systematically plan and document their design and implementation, and evaluations should report the findings with sufficient detail to reveal how IKT was associated with outcomes.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health Planning</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Translational Medical Research - organization & administration</subject><issn>1748-5908</issn><issn>1748-5908</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcFPHCEUxkljo9b6B_RiSHqxh7EwAwN4MDHG2k1NerFnwsCbWXQWVpjV-N_LdrdGG8MBAr_3vffxIfSFkhNKZfs904bQuiK0rUijVEU_oH0qmKy4InLn1XkPfcr5lhDGWdvsor26VVISQvbR1SxMMCQzgcN3IT6O4AbAUzIhj2byMeDj2a-bb9gHPAczTnNsTYJTbHC2cenDgBM8eHj8jD72ZsxwuN0P0J8flzcXP6vr31ezi_PryjLFpsr0pOusaK20rAWuqDVGgescU0LQrhcKiCCGcm5JD6rrXFMrKXrriKs5E80BOtvoLlfdApyFUGYd9TL5hUlPOhqv374EP9dDfNBMKEEFLQLHW4EU71eQJ73w2cI4mgBxlTUVgvGGU6YK-vU_9DauUij2CqWEInX7d6ItNZgRtA99LH3tWlSfFyUpGslZoU7eocpysPA2Buh9uX9TQDcFNsWcE_QvHinR6_T1Jn1d0tfr9PXa29Hrz3mp-Bd38wygkKl5</recordid><startdate>20160317</startdate><enddate>20160317</enddate><creator>Gagliardi, Anna R</creator><creator>Berta, Whitney</creator><creator>Kothari, Anita</creator><creator>Boyko, Jennifer</creator><creator>Urquhart, Robin</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160317</creationdate><title>Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review</title><author>Gagliardi, Anna R ; Berta, Whitney ; Kothari, Anita ; Boyko, Jennifer ; Urquhart, Robin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-af0bbc76c8c46e591caa9edbd49771bf79e070a155c0fe9bbd32987fcd0d25473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health Planning</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Translational Medical Research - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gagliardi, Anna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berta, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothari, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyko, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquhart, Robin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Implementation science : IS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gagliardi, Anna R</au><au>Berta, Whitney</au><au>Kothari, Anita</au><au>Boyko, Jennifer</au><au>Urquhart, Robin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Implementation science : IS</jtitle><addtitle>Implement Sci</addtitle><date>2016-03-17</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>38</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>38-38</pages><artnum>38</artnum><issn>1748-5908</issn><eissn>1748-5908</eissn><abstract>Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) refers to collaboration between researchers and decision-makers. While advocated as an approach for enhancing the relevance and use of research, IKT is challenging and inconsistently applied. This study sought to inform future IKT practice and research by synthesizing studies that empirically evaluated IKT and identifying knowledge gaps.
We performed a scoping review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2014 for English language studies that evaluated IKT interventions involving researchers and organizational or policy-level decision-makers. Data were extracted on study characteristics, IKT intervention (theory, content, mode, duration, frequency, personnel, participants, timing from initiation, initiator, source of funding, decision-maker involvement), and enablers, barriers, and outcomes reported by studies. We performed content analysis and reported summary statistics.
Thirteen studies were eligible after screening 14,754 titles and reviewing 106 full-text studies. Details about IKT activities were poorly reported, and none were formally based on theory. Studies varied in the number and type of interactions between researchers and decision-makers; meetings were the most common format. All studies reported barriers and facilitators. Studies reported a range of positive and sub-optimal outcomes. Outcomes did not appear to be associated with initiator of the partnership, dedicated funding, partnership maturity, nature of decision-maker involvement, presence or absence of enablers or barriers, or the number of different IKT activities.
The IKT strategies that achieve beneficial outcomes remain unknown. We generated a summary of IKT approaches, enablers, barriers, conditions, and outcomes that can serve as the basis for a future review or for planning ongoing primary research. Future research can contribute to three identified knowledge gaps by examining (1) how different IKT strategies influence outcomes, (2) the relationship between the logic or theory underlying IKT interventions and beneficial outcomes, and (3) when and how decision-makers should be involved in the research process. Future IKT initiatives should more systematically plan and document their design and implementation, and evaluations should report the findings with sufficient detail to reveal how IKT was associated with outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26988000</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13012-016-0399-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-5908 |
ispartof | Implementation science : IS, 2016-03, Vol.11 (38), p.38-38, Article 38 |
issn | 1748-5908 1748-5908 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4797171 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Collaboration Content analysis Decision Making Delivery of Health Care Diffusion of Innovation Funding Health Planning Health Services Humans Patient education Research methodology Researchers Social workers Studies Systematic Review Translational Medical Research - organization & administration |
title | Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A55%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20knowledge%20translation%20(IKT)%20in%20health%20care:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Implementation%20science%20:%20IS&rft.au=Gagliardi,%20Anna%20R&rft.date=2016-03-17&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=38&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=38-38&rft.artnum=38&rft.issn=1748-5908&rft.eissn=1748-5908&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13012-016-0399-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA453873854%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-af0bbc76c8c46e591caa9edbd49771bf79e070a155c0fe9bbd32987fcd0d25473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797902647&rft_id=info:pmid/26988000&rft_galeid=A453873854&rfr_iscdi=true |