Impact of a novel teaching method based on feedback, activity, individuality and relevance on students' learning

This study examines the perceived impact of a novel clinical teaching method based on FAIR principles (feedback, activity, individuality and relevance) on students' learning on clinical placement. This was a qualitative research study. Participants were third year and final year medical student...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of medical education 2016-03, Vol.7, p.87-92
Main Authors: Edafe, Ovie, Brooks, William S, Laskar, Simone N, Benjamin, Miles W, Chan, Philip
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Data Analysis
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
Educational Environment
Educational Measurement
Essays
Feedback
Health education
Hospitals
Humans
Individuality
Instructional design
Learning
Medical research
Original Research
Perceptions
Qualitative research
Researchers
Student attitudes
Students, Medical
Studies
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching - methods
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9eb34bf1ee8ed7fc11a07961eeffee3e2a85b0f6a62e2d1f4783e4b533259f63
cites
container_end_page 92
container_issue
container_start_page 87
container_title International journal of medical education
container_volume 7
creator Edafe, Ovie
Brooks, William S
Laskar, Simone N
Benjamin, Miles W
Chan, Philip
description This study examines the perceived impact of a novel clinical teaching method based on FAIR principles (feedback, activity, individuality and relevance) on students' learning on clinical placement. This was a qualitative research study. Participants were third year and final year medical students attached to one UK vascular firm over a four-year period (N=108). Students were asked to write a reflective essay on how FAIRness approach differs from previous clinical placement, and its advantages and disadvantages. Essays were thematically analysed and globally rated (positive, negative or neutral) by two independent researchers. Over 90% of essays reported positive experiences of feedback, activity, individuality and relevance model. The model provided multifaceted feedback; active participation; longitudinal improvement; relevance to stage of learning and future goals; structured teaching; professional development; safe learning environment; consultant involvement in teaching. Students perceived preparation for tutorials to be time intensive for tutors/students; a lack of teaching on medical sciences and direct observation of performance; more than once weekly sessions would be beneficial; some issues with peer and public feedback, relevance to upcoming exam and large group sizes. Students described negative experiences of "standard" clinical teaching. Progressive teaching programmes based on the FAIRness principles, feedback, activity, individuality and relevance, could be used as a model to improve current undergraduate clinical teaching.
doi_str_mv 10.5116/ijme.56e3.e7ab
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4800025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1775378239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9eb34bf1ee8ed7fc11a07961eeffee3e2a85b0f6a62e2d1f4783e4b533259f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpaUKaa49F0EN7yG4tyZLlS6GEpg0EesldjKVRVltb2kr2Qv77yuSDtLpoBv3m8UaPkPes2UrG1Jewn3ArFYotdjC8Iqe8aflGiY6_flGfkPNS9k09ouddo96SE676XkqtT8nhejqAnWnyFGhMRxzpjGB3Id7RCeddcnSAgo6mSD2iG8D-vqB1IhzDfH9BQ3S1cguMtaUQHc044hGixXWkzIvDOJdPdETIsaq-I288jAXPH-8zcnv1_fby5-bm14_ry283G9syPW96HEQ7eIao0XXeMgZN16va-2pDIActh8YrUBy5Y77ttMB2kEJw2XslzsjXB9nDMkzobDWRYTSHHCbI9yZBMP--xLAzd-loWl0_issq8PlRIKc_C5bZTKFYHEeImJZiWNdJ0Wku-op-_A_dpyXHul2les6Z0ExUavtA2ZxKyeifzbDGrHGaNU6zxmnWOOvAh5crPONP4Ym_ilGfYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792213813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of a novel teaching method based on feedback, activity, individuality and relevance on students' learning</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Edafe, Ovie ; Brooks, William S ; Laskar, Simone N ; Benjamin, Miles W ; Chan, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Edafe, Ovie ; Brooks, William S ; Laskar, Simone N ; Benjamin, Miles W ; Chan, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the perceived impact of a novel clinical teaching method based on FAIR principles (feedback, activity, individuality and relevance) on students' learning on clinical placement. This was a qualitative research study. Participants were third year and final year medical students attached to one UK vascular firm over a four-year period (N=108). Students were asked to write a reflective essay on how FAIRness approach differs from previous clinical placement, and its advantages and disadvantages. Essays were thematically analysed and globally rated (positive, negative or neutral) by two independent researchers. Over 90% of essays reported positive experiences of feedback, activity, individuality and relevance model. The model provided multifaceted feedback; active participation; longitudinal improvement; relevance to stage of learning and future goals; structured teaching; professional development; safe learning environment; consultant involvement in teaching. Students perceived preparation for tutorials to be time intensive for tutors/students; a lack of teaching on medical sciences and direct observation of performance; more than once weekly sessions would be beneficial; some issues with peer and public feedback, relevance to upcoming exam and large group sizes. Students described negative experiences of "standard" clinical teaching. Progressive teaching programmes based on the FAIRness principles, feedback, activity, individuality and relevance, could be used as a model to improve current undergraduate clinical teaching.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2042-6372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5116/ijme.56e3.e7ab</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26995588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: International Journal of Medical Education (IJME)</publisher><subject>Data Analysis ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods ; Educational Environment ; Educational Measurement ; Essays ; Feedback ; Health education ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Individuality ; Instructional design ; Learning ; Medical research ; Original Research ; Perceptions ; Qualitative research ; Researchers ; Student attitudes ; Students, Medical ; Studies ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching - methods ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>International journal of medical education, 2016-03, Vol.7, p.87-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Journal of Medical Education (IJME) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2016 Ovie Edafe et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9eb34bf1ee8ed7fc11a07961eeffee3e2a85b0f6a62e2d1f4783e4b533259f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1792213813/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1792213813?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21378,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,37012,37013,43733,43880,44590,53791,53793,74221,74397,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26995588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edafe, Ovie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laskar, Simone N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, Miles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of a novel teaching method based on feedback, activity, individuality and relevance on students' learning</title><title>International journal of medical education</title><addtitle>Int J Med Educ</addtitle><description>This study examines the perceived impact of a novel clinical teaching method based on FAIR principles (feedback, activity, individuality and relevance) on students' learning on clinical placement. This was a qualitative research study. Participants were third year and final year medical students attached to one UK vascular firm over a four-year period (N=108). Students were asked to write a reflective essay on how FAIRness approach differs from previous clinical placement, and its advantages and disadvantages. Essays were thematically analysed and globally rated (positive, negative or neutral) by two independent researchers. Over 90% of essays reported positive experiences of feedback, activity, individuality and relevance model. The model provided multifaceted feedback; active participation; longitudinal improvement; relevance to stage of learning and future goals; structured teaching; professional development; safe learning environment; consultant involvement in teaching. Students perceived preparation for tutorials to be time intensive for tutors/students; a lack of teaching on medical sciences and direct observation of performance; more than once weekly sessions would be beneficial; some issues with peer and public feedback, relevance to upcoming exam and large group sizes. Students described negative experiences of "standard" clinical teaching. Progressive teaching programmes based on the FAIRness principles, feedback, activity, individuality and relevance, could be used as a model to improve current undergraduate clinical teaching.</description><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>2042-6372</issn><issn>2042-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpaUKaa49F0EN7yG4tyZLlS6GEpg0EesldjKVRVltb2kr2Qv77yuSDtLpoBv3m8UaPkPes2UrG1Jewn3ArFYotdjC8Iqe8aflGiY6_flGfkPNS9k09ouddo96SE676XkqtT8nhejqAnWnyFGhMRxzpjGB3Id7RCeddcnSAgo6mSD2iG8D-vqB1IhzDfH9BQ3S1cguMtaUQHc044hGixXWkzIvDOJdPdETIsaq-I288jAXPH-8zcnv1_fby5-bm14_ry283G9syPW96HEQ7eIao0XXeMgZN16va-2pDIActh8YrUBy5Y77ttMB2kEJw2XslzsjXB9nDMkzobDWRYTSHHCbI9yZBMP--xLAzd-loWl0_issq8PlRIKc_C5bZTKFYHEeImJZiWNdJ0Wku-op-_A_dpyXHul2les6Z0ExUavtA2ZxKyeifzbDGrHGaNU6zxmnWOOvAh5crPONP4Ym_ilGfYA</recordid><startdate>20160320</startdate><enddate>20160320</enddate><creator>Edafe, Ovie</creator><creator>Brooks, William S</creator><creator>Laskar, Simone N</creator><creator>Benjamin, Miles W</creator><creator>Chan, Philip</creator><general>International Journal of Medical Education (IJME)</general><general>IJME</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160320</creationdate><title>Impact of a novel teaching method based on feedback, activity, individuality and relevance on students' learning</title><author>Edafe, Ovie ; Brooks, William S ; Laskar, Simone N ; Benjamin, Miles W ; Chan, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9eb34bf1ee8ed7fc11a07961eeffee3e2a85b0f6a62e2d1f4783e4b533259f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edafe, Ovie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laskar, Simone N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, Miles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medicine (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edafe, Ovie</au><au>Brooks, William S</au><au>Laskar, Simone N</au><au>Benjamin, Miles W</au><au>Chan, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of a novel teaching method based on feedback, activity, individuality and relevance on students' learning</atitle><jtitle>International journal of medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Educ</addtitle><date>2016-03-20</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>87-92</pages><issn>2042-6372</issn><eissn>2042-6372</eissn><abstract>This study examines the perceived impact of a novel clinical teaching method based on FAIR principles (feedback, activity, individuality and relevance) on students' learning on clinical placement. This was a qualitative research study. Participants were third year and final year medical students attached to one UK vascular firm over a four-year period (N=108). Students were asked to write a reflective essay on how FAIRness approach differs from previous clinical placement, and its advantages and disadvantages. Essays were thematically analysed and globally rated (positive, negative or neutral) by two independent researchers. Over 90% of essays reported positive experiences of feedback, activity, individuality and relevance model. The model provided multifaceted feedback; active participation; longitudinal improvement; relevance to stage of learning and future goals; structured teaching; professional development; safe learning environment; consultant involvement in teaching. Students perceived preparation for tutorials to be time intensive for tutors/students; a lack of teaching on medical sciences and direct observation of performance; more than once weekly sessions would be beneficial; some issues with peer and public feedback, relevance to upcoming exam and large group sizes. Students described negative experiences of "standard" clinical teaching. Progressive teaching programmes based on the FAIRness principles, feedback, activity, individuality and relevance, could be used as a model to improve current undergraduate clinical teaching.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>International Journal of Medical Education (IJME)</pub><pmid>26995588</pmid><doi>10.5116/ijme.56e3.e7ab</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2042-6372
ispartof International journal of medical education, 2016-03, Vol.7, p.87-92
issn 2042-6372
2042-6372
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4800025
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central Free; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Data Analysis
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
Educational Environment
Educational Measurement
Essays
Feedback
Health education
Hospitals
Humans
Individuality
Instructional design
Learning
Medical research
Original Research
Perceptions
Qualitative research
Researchers
Student attitudes
Students, Medical
Studies
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching - methods
United Kingdom
title Impact of a novel teaching method based on feedback, activity, individuality and relevance on students' learning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20a%20novel%20teaching%20method%20based%20on%20feedback,%20activity,%20individuality%20and%20relevance%20on%20students'%20learning&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20medical%20education&rft.au=Edafe,%20Ovie&rft.date=2016-03-20&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=87-92&rft.issn=2042-6372&rft.eissn=2042-6372&rft_id=info:doi/10.5116/ijme.56e3.e7ab&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1775378239%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9eb34bf1ee8ed7fc11a07961eeffee3e2a85b0f6a62e2d1f4783e4b533259f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792213813&rft_id=info:pmid/26995588&rfr_iscdi=true