Loading…
Contribution of mammography to MRI screening in BRCA mutation carriers by BRCA status and age: individual patient data meta-analysis
Background: We investigated the additional contribution of mammography to screening accuracy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers screened with MRI at different ages using individual patient data from six high-risk screening trials. Methods: Sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography and the combinatio...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of cancer 2016-03, Vol.114 (6), p.631-637 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
We investigated the additional contribution of mammography to screening accuracy in
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers screened with MRI at different ages using individual patient data from six high-risk screening trials.
Methods:
Sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography and the combination of these tests were compared stratified for
BRCA
mutation and age using generalised linear mixed models with random effect for studies. Number of screens needed (NSN) for additional mammography-only detected cancer was estimated.
Results:
In
BRCA1/2
mutation carriers of all ages (BRCA1=1219 and BRCA2=732), adding mammography to MRI did not significantly increase screening sensitivity (increased by 3.9% in
BRCA1
and 12.6% in
BRCA2
mutation carriers,
P
>0.05). However, in women with
BRCA2
mutation younger than 40 years, one-third of breast cancers were detected by mammography only. Number of screens needed for mammography to detect one breast cancer not detected by MRI was much higher for
BRCA1
compared with
BRCA2
mutation carriers at initial and repeat screening.
Conclusions:
Additional screening sensitivity from mammography above that from MRI is limited in
BRCA1
mutation carriers, whereas mammography contributes to screening sensitivity in
BRCA2
mutation carriers, especially those â©˝40 years. The evidence from our work highlights that a differential screening schedule by
BRCA
status is worth considering. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2016.32 |