Loading…

Explaining the sex difference in depression with a unified bargaining model of anger and depression

Most studies of depression find that women are twice as likely to be depressed as men, but no compelling explanation of this sex difference has emerged. Here, we show that the sex difference in depression can largely be explained by the sexual dimorphism in upper body strength.Abstract Background: W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolution, medicine, and public health medicine, and public health, 2016-02, Vol.2016 (1), p.117-132
Main Authors: Hagen, Edward H., Rosenström, Tom
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Most studies of depression find that women are twice as likely to be depressed as men, but no compelling explanation of this sex difference has emerged. Here, we show that the sex difference in depression can largely be explained by the sexual dimorphism in upper body strength.Abstract Background: Women are twice as likely as men to be depressed, a bias that is poorly understood. One evolutionary model proposes that depression is a bargaining strategy to compel reluctant social partners to provide more help in the wake of adversity. An evolutionary model of anger proposes that high upper body strength predisposes individuals to angrily threaten social partners who offer too few benefits or impose too many costs. Here, we propose that when social partners provide too few benefits or impose too many costs, the physically strong become overtly angry and the physically weak become depressed. The sexual dimorphism in upper body strength means that men will be more likely to bargain with anger and physical threats and women with depression. Methodology: We tested this idea using the 2011–12 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a large nationally representative sample of US households that included measures of depression and upper body strength. Results: A 2 SD increase in grip strength decreased the odds of depression by more than half (OR=0.4, P=0.0079), which did not appear to be a consequence of confounds with anthropometric, hormonal or socioeconomic variables, but was partially explained by a confound with physical disability. Nevertheless, upper body strength mediated 63% of the effect of sex on depression, but the mediation effect was unexpectedly moderated by age. Conclusions: Low upper body strength is a risk factor for depression, especially in older adults, and the sex difference in body strength appears to explain much of the perplexing sex difference in depression.
ISSN:2050-6201
2050-6201
DOI:10.1093/emph/eow006