Equivalence of MammaPrint array types in clinical trials and diagnostics

• Published in: Breast cancer research and treatment 2016-04, Vol.156 (2), p.279-287
• Main Authors: Beumer, Inès, Witteveen, Anke, Delahaye, Leonie, Wehkamp, Diederik, Snel, Mireille, Dreezen, Christa, Zheng, John, Floore, Arno, Brink, Guido, Chan, Bob, Linn, Sabine, Bernards, Rene, van ’t Veer, Laura, Glas, Annuska
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - genetics; Cancer research; Cancer therapies; Chemotherapy; Clinical trials; Diagnostics; Early Detection of Cancer - methods; Female; Gene Expression Profiling - methods; Genomes; Genomics; Humans; Medical prognosis; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics; Oncology; Preclinical Study; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Survival Analysis; Tissue Array Analysis - methods; Tissue Preservation
• ISSN: 0167-6806; 1573-7217
• DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3764-5

MammaPrint is an FDA-cleared microarray-based test that uses expression levels of the 70 MammaPrint genes to assess distant recurrence risk in early-stage breast cancer. The prospective RASTER study proved that MammaPrint Low Risk patients can safely forgo chemotherapy, which is further subject of the prospective randomized MINDACT trial. While MammaPrint diagnostic results are obtained from mini-arrays, clinical trials may be performed on whole-genome arrays. Here we demonstrate the equivalence and reproducibility of the MammaPrint test. MammaPrint indices were collected for breast cancer samples: (i) on both customized certified array types ( n  = 1,897 sample pairs), (ii) with matched fresh and FFPE tissues ( n  = 552 sample pairs), iii) for control samples replicated over a period of 10 years ( n  = 11,333), and iv) repeated measurements ( n  = 280). The array type indicated a near perfect Pearson correlation of 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.989–0.991). Paired fresh and FFPE samples showed an excellent Pearson correlation of 0.93 (95 % CI 0.92–0.94), in spite of the variability introduced by intratumoral tissue heterogeneity. Control samples showed high consistency over 10 year's time (overall reproducibility of 97.4 %). Precision and repeatability are overall 98.2 and 98.3 %, respectively. Results confirm that the combination of the near perfect correlation between array types, excellent equivalence between tissue types, and a very high stability, precision, and repeatability demonstrate that results from clinical trials (such as MINDACT and I-SPY 2) are equivalent to current MammaPrint FFPE and fresh diagnostics, and can be used interchangeably.