Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study

• Published in: BMC medical education 2016-04, Vol.16 (130), p.132-132, Article 132
• Main Authors: Eisenbarth, Sophie, Tilling, Thomas, Lueerss, Eva, Meyer, Jelka, Sehner, Susanne, Guse, Andreas H, Guse Nee Kurré, Jennifer
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Anatomy; Attitude of Health Personnel; Biological Science Disciplines - education; Cohort Studies; Core Curriculum; Curricula; Curriculum; Data Analysis; Education, Medical; Educational Change; Educational Measurement; Evaluation; Female; Focus Groups; Germany; Health education; Humans; Introductory Courses; Likert Scales; Male; Mathematics Activities; Medical Education; Medical Schools; Mixed Methods Research; Online Surveys; Organic Chemistry; Physics; Retention (Psychology); Science Curriculum; Sciences education; Socioeconomic Background; Student Participation; Systems Integration; Teaching Experience; Teaching Methods; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9

Heterogeneous basic science knowledge of medical students is an important challenge for medical education. In this study, the authors aimed at exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science (ISS) courses as a novel approach to address this challenge and to promote learning basic science concepts in medical education. ISS courses were embedded in a reformed medical curriculum. The authors used a mixed methods approach including four focus groups involving ISS course lecturers and students (two each), and five surveys of one student cohort covering the results of regular student evaluations including the ISS courses across one study year. They conducted their study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between December 2013 and July 2014. Fourteen first-year medical students and thirteen ISS course lecturers participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes focused on the temporal integration of ISS courses into the medical curriculum, the integration of ISS course contents into core curriculum contents, the value and role of ISS courses, and the courses' setting and atmosphere. The integrated course concept was positively accepted by both groups, with participants suggesting that it promotes retention of basic science knowledge. Values and roles identified by focus group participants included promotion of basic understanding of science concepts, integration of foundational and applied learning, and maximization of students' engagement and motivation. Building close links between ISS course contents and the core curriculum appeared to be crucial. Survey results confirmed qualitative findings regarding students' satisfaction, with some courses still requiring optimization. Integration of supportive basic science courses, traditionally rather part of premedical education, into the medical curriculum appears to be a feasible strategy to improve medical students' understanding of basic science concepts and to increase their motivation and engagement.