Loading…

The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients

Background Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:SpringerPlus 2016-05, Vol.5 (1), p.579-579, Article 579
Main Authors: Nagura-Inomata, Naomi, Iwahira, Yoshiko, Hayashi, Naoki, Komiya, Takako, Takahashi, Osamu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8fe4a1bacc5ce38f701723a3c48630c09c7dbd6d05ad1030cca9da9f178980743
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8fe4a1bacc5ce38f701723a3c48630c09c7dbd6d05ad1030cca9da9f178980743
container_end_page 579
container_issue 1
container_start_page 579
container_title SpringerPlus
container_volume 5
creator Nagura-Inomata, Naomi
Iwahira, Yoshiko
Hayashi, Naoki
Komiya, Takako
Takahashi, Osamu
description Background Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of the donor and graft NACs and to assess clinical factors influencing these changes. Methods Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent nipple-areola reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Nipple-areola diameter was measured immediately after the NAC reconstruction and at each follow-up visit for at least 36 months. Results The donor NAC constituted 81 % of the graft NAC at the time of operation. The size of the donor NAC gradually increased by up to 36.8 % after the operation. The size of the graft NAC showed a decrease by 4.5 % at 7 months, followed by recovery to the initial value. The ratio of the donor site size to the graft site size was increased at month 1 and then showed a gradual decrease to 1.08 at 36 months. A history of mastopexy or reduction for the donor site was independent factors associated with changes in the NAC size. Conclusions To achieve symmetry, the diameter of the donor NAC immediately after the reconstruction should be at least 20 % smaller than that of the graft NAC, especially for patients without a history of additional operations.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40064-016-2230-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4864729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808611047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8fe4a1bacc5ce38f701723a3c48630c09c7dbd6d05ad1030cca9da9f178980743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtrHDEMx01oSUKaD5BLMPTSy7TyY2zPpRBCXxDoJT0br8ezcTJrT-yZ9PHpq2WTsC2U-iJb-kmy9CfkjMFbxox6VyWAkg0w1XAuoGkPyDFnnWiYAfZi735ETmu9BTxKM6nhkBxxzaU2Wh2Tu-ubQPM0x40baQk-pzqXxc8xJ1rjL4wNNMVpGkPjSsijoz5v8PWDDnkc8_eY1nRVgqszjeh3CW168niXfCh0cnMMaa6vyMvBjTWcPtoT8u3jh-vLz83V109fLi-uGt-CmBszBOnYynnf-iDMoIFpLpzw0igBHjqv-1WvemhdzwA93nW96wamTWdAS3FC3u_qTstqE3qPvYsb7VRwyPLTZhftn5EUb-w6P1hsIDXvsMCbxwIl3y-hznYTqw8jjhfyUi1u1SjGQOr_o7oTrVKCb9HXf6G3eSkJN4GU0R2AaQ1SbEf5kmstYXj-NwO7Fd7uhLcovN0Kb1vMOd8f-DnjSWYE-A6oGErrUPZa_7Pqb1P8upY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787900858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Nagura-Inomata, Naomi ; Iwahira, Yoshiko ; Hayashi, Naoki ; Komiya, Takako ; Takahashi, Osamu</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagura-Inomata, Naomi ; Iwahira, Yoshiko ; Hayashi, Naoki ; Komiya, Takako ; Takahashi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><description>Background Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of the donor and graft NACs and to assess clinical factors influencing these changes. Methods Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent nipple-areola reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Nipple-areola diameter was measured immediately after the NAC reconstruction and at each follow-up visit for at least 36 months. Results The donor NAC constituted 81 % of the graft NAC at the time of operation. The size of the donor NAC gradually increased by up to 36.8 % after the operation. The size of the graft NAC showed a decrease by 4.5 % at 7 months, followed by recovery to the initial value. The ratio of the donor site size to the graft site size was increased at month 1 and then showed a gradual decrease to 1.08 at 36 months. A history of mastopexy or reduction for the donor site was independent factors associated with changes in the NAC size. Conclusions To achieve symmetry, the diameter of the donor NAC immediately after the reconstruction should be at least 20 % smaller than that of the graft NAC, especially for patients without a history of additional operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2230-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27247876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences ; Medicine ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>SpringerPlus, 2016-05, Vol.5 (1), p.579-579, Article 579</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><rights>SpringerPlus is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8fe4a1bacc5ce38f701723a3c48630c09c7dbd6d05ad1030cca9da9f178980743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8fe4a1bacc5ce38f701723a3c48630c09c7dbd6d05ad1030cca9da9f178980743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864729/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864729/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagura-Inomata, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahira, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiya, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><title>The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients</title><title>SpringerPlus</title><addtitle>SpringerPlus</addtitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><description>Background Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of the donor and graft NACs and to assess clinical factors influencing these changes. Methods Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent nipple-areola reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Nipple-areola diameter was measured immediately after the NAC reconstruction and at each follow-up visit for at least 36 months. Results The donor NAC constituted 81 % of the graft NAC at the time of operation. The size of the donor NAC gradually increased by up to 36.8 % after the operation. The size of the graft NAC showed a decrease by 4.5 % at 7 months, followed by recovery to the initial value. The ratio of the donor site size to the graft site size was increased at month 1 and then showed a gradual decrease to 1.08 at 36 months. A history of mastopexy or reduction for the donor site was independent factors associated with changes in the NAC size. Conclusions To achieve symmetry, the diameter of the donor NAC immediately after the reconstruction should be at least 20 % smaller than that of the graft NAC, especially for patients without a history of additional operations.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2193-1801</issn><issn>2193-1801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtrHDEMx01oSUKaD5BLMPTSy7TyY2zPpRBCXxDoJT0br8ezcTJrT-yZ9PHpq2WTsC2U-iJb-kmy9CfkjMFbxox6VyWAkg0w1XAuoGkPyDFnnWiYAfZi735ETmu9BTxKM6nhkBxxzaU2Wh2Tu-ubQPM0x40baQk-pzqXxc8xJ1rjL4wNNMVpGkPjSsijoz5v8PWDDnkc8_eY1nRVgqszjeh3CW168niXfCh0cnMMaa6vyMvBjTWcPtoT8u3jh-vLz83V109fLi-uGt-CmBszBOnYynnf-iDMoIFpLpzw0igBHjqv-1WvemhdzwA93nW96wamTWdAS3FC3u_qTstqE3qPvYsb7VRwyPLTZhftn5EUb-w6P1hsIDXvsMCbxwIl3y-hznYTqw8jjhfyUi1u1SjGQOr_o7oTrVKCb9HXf6G3eSkJN4GU0R2AaQ1SbEf5kmstYXj-NwO7Fd7uhLcovN0Kb1vMOd8f-DnjSWYE-A6oGErrUPZa_7Pqb1P8upY</recordid><startdate>20160510</startdate><enddate>20160510</enddate><creator>Nagura-Inomata, Naomi</creator><creator>Iwahira, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Hayashi, Naoki</creator><creator>Komiya, Takako</creator><creator>Takahashi, Osamu</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160510</creationdate><title>The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients</title><author>Nagura-Inomata, Naomi ; Iwahira, Yoshiko ; Hayashi, Naoki ; Komiya, Takako ; Takahashi, Osamu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8fe4a1bacc5ce38f701723a3c48630c09c7dbd6d05ad1030cca9da9f178980743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagura-Inomata, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahira, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komiya, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagura-Inomata, Naomi</au><au>Iwahira, Yoshiko</au><au>Hayashi, Naoki</au><au>Komiya, Takako</au><au>Takahashi, Osamu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle><stitle>SpringerPlus</stitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><date>2016-05-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>579</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>579-579</pages><artnum>579</artnum><issn>2193-1801</issn><eissn>2193-1801</eissn><abstract>Background Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of the donor and graft NACs and to assess clinical factors influencing these changes. Methods Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent nipple-areola reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Nipple-areola diameter was measured immediately after the NAC reconstruction and at each follow-up visit for at least 36 months. Results The donor NAC constituted 81 % of the graft NAC at the time of operation. The size of the donor NAC gradually increased by up to 36.8 % after the operation. The size of the graft NAC showed a decrease by 4.5 % at 7 months, followed by recovery to the initial value. The ratio of the donor site size to the graft site size was increased at month 1 and then showed a gradual decrease to 1.08 at 36 months. A history of mastopexy or reduction for the donor site was independent factors associated with changes in the NAC size. Conclusions To achieve symmetry, the diameter of the donor NAC immediately after the reconstruction should be at least 20 % smaller than that of the graft NAC, especially for patients without a history of additional operations.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>27247876</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40064-016-2230-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2193-1801
ispartof SpringerPlus, 2016-05, Vol.5 (1), p.579-579, Article 579
issn 2193-1801
2193-1801
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4864729
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access ; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Humanities and Social Sciences
Medicine
multidisciplinary
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20optimal%20reconstruction%20size%20of%20nipple-areola%20complex%20following%20breast%20implant%20in%20breast%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=SpringerPlus&rft.au=Nagura-Inomata,%20Naomi&rft.date=2016-05-10&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=579&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=579-579&rft.artnum=579&rft.issn=2193-1801&rft.eissn=2193-1801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40064-016-2230-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1808611047%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-8fe4a1bacc5ce38f701723a3c48630c09c7dbd6d05ad1030cca9da9f178980743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787900858&rft_id=info:pmid/27247876&rfr_iscdi=true