Loading…
Differences among Branded Hyaluronic Acids in Italy, Part 1: Data from In Vitro and Animal Studies and Instructions for Use
Ba ckground: The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for intra-articular (IA) injection is widespread around the world for patients affected by osteoarthritis. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies supporting the use of IA HAs marketed in Italy. We a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders 2016-01, Vol.2016 (2016), p.89-101 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-45943e55d0a6b4dd25cac60bffd90b3f1cf56e383650032edef773eae2364fcf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-45943e55d0a6b4dd25cac60bffd90b3f1cf56e383650032edef773eae2364fcf3 |
container_end_page | 101 |
container_issue | 2016 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders |
container_volume | 2016 |
creator | Migliore, A. Bizzi, E. De Lucia, O. Sedie, A. Delle Bentivegna, M. Mahmoud, Asmaa Foti, C. |
description | Ba ckground: The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for intra-articular (IA) injection is widespread around the world for patients affected by osteoarthritis. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies supporting the use of IA HAs marketed in Italy. We also evaluated the accuracy of indications and contraindications reported in the leaflets of such HAs compared with the available scientific evidence. Ma teria ls and methods: An extensive literature search was performed to identify all in vitro and in vivo model studies reporting on the effects of various HAs marketed in Italy for IA use. Data reported in the leaflets of different HA-based products for IA use were extracted and analyzed alongside evidence from in vitro and in vivo model studies. Results: Nine in vitro studies and 11 studies on animal models were examined. Comparing results with what is reported in the leaflets of HAs marketed in Italy, it was observed that many branded formulations are introduced in the market without any reporting of basic scientific evidence. Only 12.82% and 17.95% of branded products had been shown to be effective with scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively. The rationale of use of these products is based on their nature, as if a class effect existed such that all HAs would yield similar effects. Conclusions: Data on HAs deriving from in vitro and in vivo studies are scarce and relate to only a small percentage of products marketed in Italy. Many indications and contraindications are arbitrarily reported in Italian HA leaflets without the support of scientific evidence. Larger and brand-specific studies are necessary and should be reported in the leaflets to guide clinicians in making an appropriate choice regarding HA-based IA therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4137/CMAMD.S38857 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4881871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20160624001_201601_201703170001_201703170001_89_101</airiti_id><sage_id>10.4137_CMAMD.S38857</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4099035821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-45943e55d0a6b4dd25cac60bffd90b3f1cf56e383650032edef773eae2364fcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhgdRbKm981oC3ih0az4nGS-EdVftYouFWm9DNpOsKTNJTTLC4p833VnrdhEDISfJkzfnnLeqniN4ShHhb2YX04v56RURgvFH1SFCvJkwStHjnfigOk7pBpZBGkwpe1odYI4ZJ404rH7NnbUmGq9NAqoPfgXeR-Vb04KzteqGGLzTYKpdm4DzYJFVtz4BlypmgN6CucoK2Bh6sPDgm8sxgPIWTL3rVQeu8tC6O9lytPApx0FnF3wCNkRwncyz6olVXTLH2_Wouv744evsbHL-5dNiNj2fKNbwPKGsocQw1kJVL2nbYqaVruHS2raBS2KRtqw2RJCalRKxaY3lnBhlMKmp1ZYcVe9G3dth2ZtWG5-j6uRtLFnGtQzKyYc33n2Xq_BTUiGQ4KgIvNoKxPBjMCnL3iVtuk55E4YkS6dJAwXCoqAv99CbMERfypOYYsyp4DX6H1W0Ggw5F7hQJyOlY0gpGnufMoLyzn65sV-O9hf8xW6Z9_AfswvwegSSWpmdH_8ttu1Z55YmZpWUVq3pnXrQtr1LraQOvWTFiCLweRRQLrrs_n53iSGqYY0phEhu4s3CISkT7m9EU_JD5DfuTOL_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1799207782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences among Branded Hyaluronic Acids in Italy, Part 1: Data from In Vitro and Animal Studies and Instructions for Use</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Migliore, A. ; Bizzi, E. ; De Lucia, O. ; Sedie, A. Delle ; Bentivegna, M. ; Mahmoud, Asmaa ; Foti, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Migliore, A. ; Bizzi, E. ; De Lucia, O. ; Sedie, A. Delle ; Bentivegna, M. ; Mahmoud, Asmaa ; Foti, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Ba ckground: The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for intra-articular (IA) injection is widespread around the world for patients affected by osteoarthritis. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies supporting the use of IA HAs marketed in Italy. We also evaluated the accuracy of indications and contraindications reported in the leaflets of such HAs compared with the available scientific evidence. Ma teria ls and methods: An extensive literature search was performed to identify all in vitro and in vivo model studies reporting on the effects of various HAs marketed in Italy for IA use. Data reported in the leaflets of different HA-based products for IA use were extracted and analyzed alongside evidence from in vitro and in vivo model studies. Results: Nine in vitro studies and 11 studies on animal models were examined. Comparing results with what is reported in the leaflets of HAs marketed in Italy, it was observed that many branded formulations are introduced in the market without any reporting of basic scientific evidence. Only 12.82% and 17.95% of branded products had been shown to be effective with scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively. The rationale of use of these products is based on their nature, as if a class effect existed such that all HAs would yield similar effects. Conclusions: Data on HAs deriving from in vitro and in vivo studies are scarce and relate to only a small percentage of products marketed in Italy. Many indications and contraindications are arbitrarily reported in Italian HA leaflets without the support of scientific evidence. Larger and brand-specific studies are necessary and should be reported in the leaflets to guide clinicians in making an appropriate choice regarding HA-based IA therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1179-5441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-5441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4137/CMAMD.S38857</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27257398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Libertas Academica</publisher><subject>Hyaluronic acid ; Injections ; Original Research ; Osteoarthritis</subject><ispartof>Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016-01, Vol.2016 (2016), p.89-101</ispartof><rights>2016 SAGE Publications.</rights><rights>Copyright Libertas Academica Ltd 2016</rights><rights>2016 SAGE Publications. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-45943e55d0a6b4dd25cac60bffd90b3f1cf56e383650032edef773eae2364fcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-45943e55d0a6b4dd25cac60bffd90b3f1cf56e383650032edef773eae2364fcf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881871/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1799207782?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21945,25731,27830,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Migliore, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedie, A. Delle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentivegna, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences among Branded Hyaluronic Acids in Italy, Part 1: Data from In Vitro and Animal Studies and Instructions for Use</title><title>Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders</title><addtitle>Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Ba ckground: The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for intra-articular (IA) injection is widespread around the world for patients affected by osteoarthritis. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies supporting the use of IA HAs marketed in Italy. We also evaluated the accuracy of indications and contraindications reported in the leaflets of such HAs compared with the available scientific evidence. Ma teria ls and methods: An extensive literature search was performed to identify all in vitro and in vivo model studies reporting on the effects of various HAs marketed in Italy for IA use. Data reported in the leaflets of different HA-based products for IA use were extracted and analyzed alongside evidence from in vitro and in vivo model studies. Results: Nine in vitro studies and 11 studies on animal models were examined. Comparing results with what is reported in the leaflets of HAs marketed in Italy, it was observed that many branded formulations are introduced in the market without any reporting of basic scientific evidence. Only 12.82% and 17.95% of branded products had been shown to be effective with scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively. The rationale of use of these products is based on their nature, as if a class effect existed such that all HAs would yield similar effects. Conclusions: Data on HAs deriving from in vitro and in vivo studies are scarce and relate to only a small percentage of products marketed in Italy. Many indications and contraindications are arbitrarily reported in Italian HA leaflets without the support of scientific evidence. Larger and brand-specific studies are necessary and should be reported in the leaflets to guide clinicians in making an appropriate choice regarding HA-based IA therapy.</description><subject>Hyaluronic acid</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><issn>1179-5441</issn><issn>1179-5441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhgdRbKm981oC3ih0az4nGS-EdVftYouFWm9DNpOsKTNJTTLC4p833VnrdhEDISfJkzfnnLeqniN4ShHhb2YX04v56RURgvFH1SFCvJkwStHjnfigOk7pBpZBGkwpe1odYI4ZJ404rH7NnbUmGq9NAqoPfgXeR-Vb04KzteqGGLzTYKpdm4DzYJFVtz4BlypmgN6CucoK2Bh6sPDgm8sxgPIWTL3rVQeu8tC6O9lytPApx0FnF3wCNkRwncyz6olVXTLH2_Wouv744evsbHL-5dNiNj2fKNbwPKGsocQw1kJVL2nbYqaVruHS2raBS2KRtqw2RJCalRKxaY3lnBhlMKmp1ZYcVe9G3dth2ZtWG5-j6uRtLFnGtQzKyYc33n2Xq_BTUiGQ4KgIvNoKxPBjMCnL3iVtuk55E4YkS6dJAwXCoqAv99CbMERfypOYYsyp4DX6H1W0Ggw5F7hQJyOlY0gpGnufMoLyzn65sV-O9hf8xW6Z9_AfswvwegSSWpmdH_8ttu1Z55YmZpWUVq3pnXrQtr1LraQOvWTFiCLweRRQLrrs_n53iSGqYY0phEhu4s3CISkT7m9EU_JD5DfuTOL_</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Migliore, A.</creator><creator>Bizzi, E.</creator><creator>De Lucia, O.</creator><creator>Sedie, A. Delle</creator><creator>Bentivegna, M.</creator><creator>Mahmoud, Asmaa</creator><creator>Foti, C.</creator><general>Libertas Academica</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>188</scope><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Differences among Branded Hyaluronic Acids in Italy, Part 1: Data from In Vitro and Animal Studies and Instructions for Use</title><author>Migliore, A. ; Bizzi, E. ; De Lucia, O. ; Sedie, A. Delle ; Bentivegna, M. ; Mahmoud, Asmaa ; Foti, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-45943e55d0a6b4dd25cac60bffd90b3f1cf56e383650032edef773eae2364fcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Hyaluronic acid</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Migliore, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedie, A. Delle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentivegna, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Migliore, A.</au><au>Bizzi, E.</au><au>De Lucia, O.</au><au>Sedie, A. Delle</au><au>Bentivegna, M.</au><au>Mahmoud, Asmaa</au><au>Foti, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences among Branded Hyaluronic Acids in Italy, Part 1: Data from In Vitro and Animal Studies and Instructions for Use</atitle><jtitle>Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2016</volume><issue>2016</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>89-101</pages><issn>1179-5441</issn><eissn>1179-5441</eissn><abstract>Ba ckground: The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) for intra-articular (IA) injection is widespread around the world for patients affected by osteoarthritis. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies supporting the use of IA HAs marketed in Italy. We also evaluated the accuracy of indications and contraindications reported in the leaflets of such HAs compared with the available scientific evidence. Ma teria ls and methods: An extensive literature search was performed to identify all in vitro and in vivo model studies reporting on the effects of various HAs marketed in Italy for IA use. Data reported in the leaflets of different HA-based products for IA use were extracted and analyzed alongside evidence from in vitro and in vivo model studies. Results: Nine in vitro studies and 11 studies on animal models were examined. Comparing results with what is reported in the leaflets of HAs marketed in Italy, it was observed that many branded formulations are introduced in the market without any reporting of basic scientific evidence. Only 12.82% and 17.95% of branded products had been shown to be effective with scientific evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively. The rationale of use of these products is based on their nature, as if a class effect existed such that all HAs would yield similar effects. Conclusions: Data on HAs deriving from in vitro and in vivo studies are scarce and relate to only a small percentage of products marketed in Italy. Many indications and contraindications are arbitrarily reported in Italian HA leaflets without the support of scientific evidence. Larger and brand-specific studies are necessary and should be reported in the leaflets to guide clinicians in making an appropriate choice regarding HA-based IA therapy.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Libertas Academica</pub><pmid>27257398</pmid><doi>10.4137/CMAMD.S38857</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1179-5441 |
ispartof | Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016-01, Vol.2016 (2016), p.89-101 |
issn | 1179-5441 1179-5441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4881871 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); PubMed Central |
subjects | Hyaluronic acid Injections Original Research Osteoarthritis |
title | Differences among Branded Hyaluronic Acids in Italy, Part 1: Data from In Vitro and Animal Studies and Instructions for Use |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T08%3A56%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20among%20Branded%20Hyaluronic%20Acids%20in%20Italy,%20Part%201:%20Data%20from%20In%20Vitro%20and%20Animal%20Studies%20and%20Instructions%20for%20Use&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20Medicine%20Insights:%20Arthritis%20and%20Musculoskeletal%20Disorders&rft.au=Migliore,%20A.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=2016&rft.issue=2016&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=89-101&rft.issn=1179-5441&rft.eissn=1179-5441&rft_id=info:doi/10.4137/CMAMD.S38857&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4099035821%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a597t-45943e55d0a6b4dd25cac60bffd90b3f1cf56e383650032edef773eae2364fcf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1799207782&rft_id=info:pmid/27257398&rft_airiti_id=P20160624001_201601_201703170001_201703170001_89_101&rft_sage_id=10.4137_CMAMD.S38857&rfr_iscdi=true |