A scoping review of the nurse practitioner workforce in oncology

• Published in: Cancer medicine (Malden, MA) MA), 2016-08, Vol.5 (8), p.1908-1916
• Main Authors: Coombs, Lorinda A., Hunt, Lauren, Cataldo, Janine
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aging; Cancer; Cancer therapies; Clinical Cancer Research; Cross-Sectional Studies; Deoxyribonucleic acid; DNA; DNA methylation; Humans; Internal medicine; Licenses; Malignancy; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms - epidemiology; Neoplasms - nursing; nurse practitioner; Nurse practitioners; Nurse Practitioners - statistics & numerical data; Nursing; Older people; Oncology; Primary care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Review; Reviews; scoping review; Studies; Systematic review; Uninsured people; United States - epidemiology; Workforce
• ISSN: 2045-7634; 2045-7634
• DOI: 10.1002/cam4.769

The quality of cancer care may be compromised in the near future because of work force issues. Several factors will impact the oncology health provider work force: an aging population, an increase in the number of cancer survivors, and expansion of health care coverage for the previously uninsured. Between October 2014 and March 2015, an electronic literature search of English language articles was conducted using PubMed®, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Sciences (CINAHL®), Web of Science, Journal Storage (JSTOR®), Google Scholar, and SCOPUS®. Using the scoping review criteria, the research question was identified “How much care in oncology is provided by nurse practitioners (NPs)?” Key search terms were kept broad and included: “NP” AND “oncology” AND “workforce”. The literature was searched between 2005 and 2015, using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 studies were identified, further review resulted in 10 relevant studies that met all criteria. Results demonstrated that NPs are utilized in both inpatient and outpatient settings, across all malignancy types and in a variety of roles. Academic institutions were strongly represented in all relevant studies, a finding that may reflect the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty work hour limitations. There was no pattern associated with state scope of practice and NP representation in this scoping review. Many of the studies reviewed relied on subjective information, or represented a very small number of NPs. There is an obvious need for an objective analysis of the amount of care provided by oncology NPs. The quality of cancer care may be compromised in the near future because of work force issues. Nurse practitioners are currently utilized in both inpatient and outpatient settings, across all malignancy types and in a variety of roles. The scoping review demonstrates that a clear need for an objective analysis of the amount of care and the impact of care provided by the oncology nurse practitioners.