Loading…

Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice

Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic alg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open heart 2016-06, Vol.3 (1), p.e000406-e000406
Main Author: Archbold, R Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23
container_end_page e000406
container_issue 1
container_start_page e000406
container_title Open heart
container_volume 3
creator Archbold, R Andrew
description Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4908898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4086501311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAURSMEolXpFyAhS2ymixQ7mXgcFkhVNNCRqrIorK0X5yXjUWIH2wHmQ_kfnJmhKqxY2fI79-ravknymtFrxnL-zo5oti6kGWU8pZQuKX-WnGe0yNOcZ8vnT_ZnyaX3u8iwrOC05C-Ts2yV5wUvivPkV2WHEZz21pAaww9EQ-4haGugJxvjgw5TQNJaR24R-rAlYBpSgUOy_qmw79EoJIv7TbW-OozWk4vZwJAHqzSGPbHtjDfa9rbbk8X6oboi3aQb7LVBf3AOWySNhs5Yr_3BZQADHQ5owqz3Aeoe46DTBt4TPYy9VoeQR72KVvGgJ6MDFbTCV8mLFnqPl6f1Ivn6cf2luk3vPn_aVDd3aV3kIqSszhhlAihb8YZj29C6bUtECvF9AEWLdSawFAJrxFZFnEZkxZfIQeWQ5RfJh6PvONUDNirmddDL0ekB3F5a0PLvidFb2dnvcllSIUoRDRYnA2e_TeiDHLSfnxUM2slLtirLgi8FoxF9-w-6s5OL33SgCpHNXKTyI6Wc9d5h-xiGUTk3R56aI-fmyGNzourN03s8av70JALXR6Aedv_l-Bs_gdTF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795825648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>British Medical Journal Open Access Journals</source><creator>Archbold, R Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Archbold, R Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-3624</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2398-595X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-3624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27335655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cholesterol ; Clinical medicine ; Coronary vessels ; Diabetes ; Diagnostic tests ; Excellence ; Heart attacks ; Hormone replacement therapy ; Hypertension ; Medical imaging ; Pain ; Review ; Society ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Open heart, 2016-06, Vol.3 (1), p.e000406-e000406</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1795825648/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1795825648?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,313,314,723,776,780,788,881,25731,27526,27527,27899,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27335655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Archbold, R Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</title><title>Open heart</title><addtitle>Open Heart</addtitle><description>Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Excellence</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2053-3624</issn><issn>2398-595X</issn><issn>2053-3624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAURSMEolXpFyAhS2ymixQ7mXgcFkhVNNCRqrIorK0X5yXjUWIH2wHmQ_kfnJmhKqxY2fI79-ravknymtFrxnL-zo5oti6kGWU8pZQuKX-WnGe0yNOcZ8vnT_ZnyaX3u8iwrOC05C-Ts2yV5wUvivPkV2WHEZz21pAaww9EQ-4haGugJxvjgw5TQNJaR24R-rAlYBpSgUOy_qmw79EoJIv7TbW-OozWk4vZwJAHqzSGPbHtjDfa9rbbk8X6oboi3aQb7LVBf3AOWySNhs5Yr_3BZQADHQ5owqz3Aeoe46DTBt4TPYy9VoeQR72KVvGgJ6MDFbTCV8mLFnqPl6f1Ivn6cf2luk3vPn_aVDd3aV3kIqSszhhlAihb8YZj29C6bUtECvF9AEWLdSawFAJrxFZFnEZkxZfIQeWQ5RfJh6PvONUDNirmddDL0ekB3F5a0PLvidFb2dnvcllSIUoRDRYnA2e_TeiDHLSfnxUM2slLtirLgi8FoxF9-w-6s5OL33SgCpHNXKTyI6Wc9d5h-xiGUTk3R56aI-fmyGNzourN03s8av70JALXR6Aedv_l-Bs_gdTF</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Archbold, R Andrew</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</title><author>Archbold, R Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Excellence</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Archbold, R Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>British Medical Journal Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open heart</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Archbold, R Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</atitle><jtitle>Open heart</jtitle><addtitle>Open Heart</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e000406</spage><epage>e000406</epage><pages>e000406-e000406</pages><issn>2053-3624</issn><issn>2398-595X</issn><eissn>2053-3624</eissn><abstract>Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>27335655</pmid><doi>10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2053-3624
ispartof Open heart, 2016-06, Vol.3 (1), p.e000406-e000406
issn 2053-3624
2398-595X
2053-3624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4908898
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central; British Medical Journal Open Access Journals
subjects Acute coronary syndromes
Cardiology
Cardiovascular disease
Cholesterol
Clinical medicine
Coronary vessels
Diabetes
Diagnostic tests
Excellence
Heart attacks
Hormone replacement therapy
Hypertension
Medical imaging
Pain
Review
Society
Womens health
title Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20National%20Institute%20for%20Health%20and%20Care%20Excellence%20(NICE)%20and%20European%20Society%20of%20Cardiology%20(ESC)%20guidelines%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20and%20management%20of%20stable%20angina:%20implications%20for%20clinical%20practice&rft.jtitle=Open%20heart&rft.au=Archbold,%20R%20Andrew&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e000406&rft.epage=e000406&rft.pages=e000406-e000406&rft.issn=2053-3624&rft.eissn=2053-3624&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4086501311%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795825648&rft_id=info:pmid/27335655&rfr_iscdi=true