Loading…
Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice
Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic alg...
Saved in:
Published in: | Open heart 2016-06, Vol.3 (1), p.e000406-e000406 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23 |
container_end_page | e000406 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e000406 |
container_title | Open heart |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Archbold, R Andrew |
description | Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4908898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4086501311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAURSMEolXpFyAhS2ymixQ7mXgcFkhVNNCRqrIorK0X5yXjUWIH2wHmQ_kfnJmhKqxY2fI79-ravknymtFrxnL-zo5oti6kGWU8pZQuKX-WnGe0yNOcZ8vnT_ZnyaX3u8iwrOC05C-Ts2yV5wUvivPkV2WHEZz21pAaww9EQ-4haGugJxvjgw5TQNJaR24R-rAlYBpSgUOy_qmw79EoJIv7TbW-OozWk4vZwJAHqzSGPbHtjDfa9rbbk8X6oboi3aQb7LVBf3AOWySNhs5Yr_3BZQADHQ5owqz3Aeoe46DTBt4TPYy9VoeQR72KVvGgJ6MDFbTCV8mLFnqPl6f1Ivn6cf2luk3vPn_aVDd3aV3kIqSszhhlAihb8YZj29C6bUtECvF9AEWLdSawFAJrxFZFnEZkxZfIQeWQ5RfJh6PvONUDNirmddDL0ekB3F5a0PLvidFb2dnvcllSIUoRDRYnA2e_TeiDHLSfnxUM2slLtirLgi8FoxF9-w-6s5OL33SgCpHNXKTyI6Wc9d5h-xiGUTk3R56aI-fmyGNzourN03s8av70JALXR6Aedv_l-Bs_gdTF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795825648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>British Medical Journal Open Access Journals</source><creator>Archbold, R Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Archbold, R Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-3624</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2398-595X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-3624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27335655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cholesterol ; Clinical medicine ; Coronary vessels ; Diabetes ; Diagnostic tests ; Excellence ; Heart attacks ; Hormone replacement therapy ; Hypertension ; Medical imaging ; Pain ; Review ; Society ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Open heart, 2016-06, Vol.3 (1), p.e000406-e000406</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1795825648/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1795825648?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,313,314,723,776,780,788,881,25731,27526,27527,27899,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27335655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Archbold, R Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</title><title>Open heart</title><addtitle>Open Heart</addtitle><description>Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Excellence</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2053-3624</issn><issn>2398-595X</issn><issn>2053-3624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAURSMEolXpFyAhS2ymixQ7mXgcFkhVNNCRqrIorK0X5yXjUWIH2wHmQ_kfnJmhKqxY2fI79-ravknymtFrxnL-zo5oti6kGWU8pZQuKX-WnGe0yNOcZ8vnT_ZnyaX3u8iwrOC05C-Ts2yV5wUvivPkV2WHEZz21pAaww9EQ-4haGugJxvjgw5TQNJaR24R-rAlYBpSgUOy_qmw79EoJIv7TbW-OozWk4vZwJAHqzSGPbHtjDfa9rbbk8X6oboi3aQb7LVBf3AOWySNhs5Yr_3BZQADHQ5owqz3Aeoe46DTBt4TPYy9VoeQR72KVvGgJ6MDFbTCV8mLFnqPl6f1Ivn6cf2luk3vPn_aVDd3aV3kIqSszhhlAihb8YZj29C6bUtECvF9AEWLdSawFAJrxFZFnEZkxZfIQeWQ5RfJh6PvONUDNirmddDL0ekB3F5a0PLvidFb2dnvcllSIUoRDRYnA2e_TeiDHLSfnxUM2slLtirLgi8FoxF9-w-6s5OL33SgCpHNXKTyI6Wc9d5h-xiGUTk3R56aI-fmyGNzourN03s8av70JALXR6Aedv_l-Bs_gdTF</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Archbold, R Andrew</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</title><author>Archbold, R Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Excellence</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Archbold, R Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>British Medical Journal Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open heart</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Archbold, R Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice</atitle><jtitle>Open heart</jtitle><addtitle>Open Heart</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e000406</spage><epage>e000406</epage><pages>e000406-e000406</pages><issn>2053-3624</issn><issn>2398-595X</issn><eissn>2053-3624</eissn><abstract>Cardiologists in the UK use clinical practice guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to aid clinical decision-making. This review compares their recommendations regarding stable angina. NICE's diagnostic algorithm changed clinical practice in the UK, with most cardiologists moving from the exercise ECG towards newer, more accurate imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for diagnostic testing in patients with a low or medium probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and directly to invasive coronary angiography in patients with a high probability of CAD. ESC guidelines are based around stress imaging for most patient groups. Both guidelines stress the importance of optimal medical therapy for patients with stable angina. NICE recommends coronary artery bypass graft surgery to improve prognosis for patients with left main stem and/or proximal 3-vessel disease, whereas the ESC also includes proximal left anterior descending artery disease among its indications for revascularisation to improve prognosis, particularly if there is evidence of myocardial ischaemia. The relation between disease complexity and 5-year clinical outcomes after revascularisation in patients with left main stem and/or 3-vessel CAD has been integrated into ESC guidance through the use of the SYNTAX score to aid treatment selection in this group of patients. Patients with stable angina who have disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery are less likely to undergo myocardial revascularisation if they are managed according to NICE's guidance compared with the ESC's guidance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>27335655</pmid><doi>10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2053-3624 |
ispartof | Open heart, 2016-06, Vol.3 (1), p.e000406-e000406 |
issn | 2053-3624 2398-595X 2053-3624 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4908898 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central; British Medical Journal Open Access Journals |
subjects | Acute coronary syndromes Cardiology Cardiovascular disease Cholesterol Clinical medicine Coronary vessels Diabetes Diagnostic tests Excellence Heart attacks Hormone replacement therapy Hypertension Medical imaging Pain Review Society Womens health |
title | Comparison between National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable angina: implications for clinical practice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20National%20Institute%20for%20Health%20and%20Care%20Excellence%20(NICE)%20and%20European%20Society%20of%20Cardiology%20(ESC)%20guidelines%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20and%20management%20of%20stable%20angina:%20implications%20for%20clinical%20practice&rft.jtitle=Open%20heart&rft.au=Archbold,%20R%20Andrew&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e000406&rft.epage=e000406&rft.pages=e000406-e000406&rft.issn=2053-3624&rft.eissn=2053-3624&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4086501311%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b538t-1b21018a0176d6efd0bff9ee0a733ae8feb28e988ebeefc1b20d0b764e6ac3a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795825648&rft_id=info:pmid/27335655&rfr_iscdi=true |