Loading…

Salud es Vida: a Cervical Cancer Screening Intervention for Rural Latina Immigrant Women

This study examined the feasibility and efficacy of Salud es Vida —a promotora -led, Spanish language educational group session on cervical cancer screening (Pap tests)—self-efficacy (belief in ability to schedule and complete a Pap test), and knowledge among immigrant Hispanic/Latina women from far...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cancer education 2017-12, Vol.32 (4), p.690-699
Main Authors: Luque, John S., Tarasenko, Yelena N., Reyes-Garcia, Claudia, Alfonso, Moya L., Suazo, Norma, Rebing, Laura, Ferris, Daron G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined the feasibility and efficacy of Salud es Vida —a promotora -led, Spanish language educational group session on cervical cancer screening (Pap tests)—self-efficacy (belief in ability to schedule and complete a Pap test), and knowledge among immigrant Hispanic/Latina women from farmworker backgrounds. These women are disproportionately burdened with cervical cancer, with mortality rates significantly higher than non-Hispanic whites. The two-arm, quasi-experimental study was conducted in four rural counties of Southeast Georgia in 2014–2015. Hispanic/Latina immigrant women aged 21–65 years and overdue for a Pap test were included as intervention ( N  = 38) and control ( N  = 52) group participants. The intervention was developed in partnership with a group of promotoras to create the toolkit of materials which includes a curriculum guide, a brochure, a flipchart, a short animated video, and in-class activities. Twelve (32 %) intervention group participants received the Pap test compared to 10 (19 %) control group participants ( p  = 0.178). The intervention group scored significantly higher on both cervical cancer knowledge recall and retention than the control group ( p  
ISSN:0885-8195
1543-0154
DOI:10.1007/s13187-015-0978-x