Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations: a-single center experience

• Published in: Turkish journal of surgery 2016-06, Vol.32 (2), p.93-96
• Main Authors: Bozkurt, Mehmet Abdussamet, Kocataş, Ali, Gemici, Eyüp, Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar, Alış, Halil
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Classification; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal surgery; Laparoscopy; Mortality; Original Investigation; Patients; Radiation therapy; Robotics; Statistical analysis; Surgical techniques; Tomography; Tumors
• ISSN: 1300-0705; 2564-6850; 1308-8521; 2564-7032
• DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2015.3003

Robotic surgery was first introduced in 2000 especially to overcome the limitations of low rectum cancer surgery. There is still no consensus regarding the standard method for colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare robotic surgery with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This is a retrospective study. Data of patients with a diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer were analyzed for robotic colorectal surgery and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The cost of robotic surgery group was statistically higher than the laparoscopic surgery group (p=0.032). The average operation duration was 178 minutes in the laparoscopic surgery group and 228 minutes in the robotic surgery group, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.044). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding other parameters. Disadvantages of robotic surgery seem to be its higher cost and longer operation duration as compared to laparoscopic surgery. We claim that an increase in the number of cases and experience may shorten the operation time while the increase in commercial interest may decrease the cost disadvantage of robotic surgery.