Loading…

The effect of injection using narrow-bore needles on mammalian cells: administration and formulation considerations for cell therapies

Objectives This study focuses on the effect of the injection administration process on a range of cell characteristics. Methods Effects of different ejection rates, needle sizes and cell suspension densities were assessed in terms of viability, membrane integrity, apoptosis and senescence of NIH 3T3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology 2015-05, Vol.67 (5), p.640-650
Main Authors: Amer, Mahetab H., White, Lisa J., Shakesheff, Kevin M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6222-63dd386d26bef13042af6c74721e4e7668b31118365678e573e421ccd8deb8df3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6222-63dd386d26bef13042af6c74721e4e7668b31118365678e573e421ccd8deb8df3
container_end_page 650
container_issue 5
container_start_page 640
container_title Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology
container_volume 67
creator Amer, Mahetab H.
White, Lisa J.
Shakesheff, Kevin M.
description Objectives This study focuses on the effect of the injection administration process on a range of cell characteristics. Methods Effects of different ejection rates, needle sizes and cell suspension densities were assessed in terms of viability, membrane integrity, apoptosis and senescence of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. For ratiometric measurements, a multiplex assay was used to verify cell viability, cytotoxicity and apoptosis independent of cell number. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels and viscosity‐modifying excipients was also assessed. Key findings Ejections at 150 μl/min resulted in the highest percentage of dose being delivered as viable cells among ejection rates tested. The difference in proportions of apoptotic cells became apparent 48 h after ejection, with proportions being higher in samples ejected at slower rates. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels demonstrated a protective action on the cell payload. Conclusions This study demonstrates the importance of careful consideration of administration protocols required for successful delivery of cell suspensions, according to their nature and cellular responses post‐ejection.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jphp.12362
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4964945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3661111801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6222-63dd386d26bef13042af6c74721e4e7668b31118365678e573e421ccd8deb8df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUtRCIDoUNH4AssUNKiR-xExZIVQVT0AgqVFR2lhNfdzwkdrAnlP4A341n0o5gQzaOfR6-xweh56Q8Ifl7vRnX4wmhTNAHaEFLTgtJqvohWpQlpQWrJDtCT1LalGUphRCP0RGtBGUNrRfo9-UaMFgL3RYHi53f5D8XPJ6S89fY6xjDTdGGCNgDmB4SzuCgh0H3TnvcQd-nN1ibwXmXtlHvxdobbEMcpn7ed8EnZ2BG0w7aC_F2nc9GB-kpemR1n-DZ3XqMvr5_d3l2Xqw-Lz-cna6KTtCcRTBjWC0MFS1YwnJUbUUnuaQEOORwdcvyi9RMVELWkJMDp6TrTG2grY1lx-jt7DtO7QCmA59H7tUY3aDjrQraqX8R79bqOvxUvBG84VU2eHlnEMOPCdJWbcIUfZ5ZESF5JSpeisx6NbO6GFKKYA83kFLtOlO7ztS-s0x-8fdMB-p9SZlAZsKN6-H2P1bq48X5xb1pMWtyKfDroNHxuxKSyUpdfVqqZsXF1bL5pr6wPySDtJE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674565406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of injection using narrow-bore needles on mammalian cells: administration and formulation considerations for cell therapies</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Amer, Mahetab H. ; White, Lisa J. ; Shakesheff, Kevin M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Amer, Mahetab H. ; White, Lisa J. ; Shakesheff, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study focuses on the effect of the injection administration process on a range of cell characteristics. Methods Effects of different ejection rates, needle sizes and cell suspension densities were assessed in terms of viability, membrane integrity, apoptosis and senescence of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. For ratiometric measurements, a multiplex assay was used to verify cell viability, cytotoxicity and apoptosis independent of cell number. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels and viscosity‐modifying excipients was also assessed. Key findings Ejections at 150 μl/min resulted in the highest percentage of dose being delivered as viable cells among ejection rates tested. The difference in proportions of apoptotic cells became apparent 48 h after ejection, with proportions being higher in samples ejected at slower rates. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels demonstrated a protective action on the cell payload. Conclusions This study demonstrates the importance of careful consideration of administration protocols required for successful delivery of cell suspensions, according to their nature and cellular responses post‐ejection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3573</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7158</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25623928</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPPMAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apoptosis ; cell injection ; Cell Survival ; cell therapies ; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - instrumentation ; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - methods ; Cellular Senescence ; Injections - adverse effects ; Injections - instrumentation ; Mice ; Needles - adverse effects ; NIH 3T3 ; NIH 3T3 Cells ; Research Paper ; Research Papers ; Suspensions ; viability</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology, 2015-05, Vol.67 (5), p.640-650</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Pharmaceutical Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Royal Pharmaceutical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6222-63dd386d26bef13042af6c74721e4e7668b31118365678e573e421ccd8deb8df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6222-63dd386d26bef13042af6c74721e4e7668b31118365678e573e421ccd8deb8df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amer, Mahetab H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakesheff, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of injection using narrow-bore needles on mammalian cells: administration and formulation considerations for cell therapies</title><title>Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Pharm Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Objectives This study focuses on the effect of the injection administration process on a range of cell characteristics. Methods Effects of different ejection rates, needle sizes and cell suspension densities were assessed in terms of viability, membrane integrity, apoptosis and senescence of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. For ratiometric measurements, a multiplex assay was used to verify cell viability, cytotoxicity and apoptosis independent of cell number. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels and viscosity‐modifying excipients was also assessed. Key findings Ejections at 150 μl/min resulted in the highest percentage of dose being delivered as viable cells among ejection rates tested. The difference in proportions of apoptotic cells became apparent 48 h after ejection, with proportions being higher in samples ejected at slower rates. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels demonstrated a protective action on the cell payload. Conclusions This study demonstrates the importance of careful consideration of administration protocols required for successful delivery of cell suspensions, according to their nature and cellular responses post‐ejection.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>cell injection</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>cell therapies</subject><subject>Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Cellular Senescence</subject><subject>Injections - adverse effects</subject><subject>Injections - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Needles - adverse effects</subject><subject>NIH 3T3</subject><subject>NIH 3T3 Cells</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Suspensions</subject><subject>viability</subject><issn>0022-3573</issn><issn>2042-7158</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUtRCIDoUNH4AssUNKiR-xExZIVQVT0AgqVFR2lhNfdzwkdrAnlP4A341n0o5gQzaOfR6-xweh56Q8Ifl7vRnX4wmhTNAHaEFLTgtJqvohWpQlpQWrJDtCT1LalGUphRCP0RGtBGUNrRfo9-UaMFgL3RYHi53f5D8XPJ6S89fY6xjDTdGGCNgDmB4SzuCgh0H3TnvcQd-nN1ibwXmXtlHvxdobbEMcpn7ed8EnZ2BG0w7aC_F2nc9GB-kpemR1n-DZ3XqMvr5_d3l2Xqw-Lz-cna6KTtCcRTBjWC0MFS1YwnJUbUUnuaQEOORwdcvyi9RMVELWkJMDp6TrTG2grY1lx-jt7DtO7QCmA59H7tUY3aDjrQraqX8R79bqOvxUvBG84VU2eHlnEMOPCdJWbcIUfZ5ZESF5JSpeisx6NbO6GFKKYA83kFLtOlO7ztS-s0x-8fdMB-p9SZlAZsKN6-H2P1bq48X5xb1pMWtyKfDroNHxuxKSyUpdfVqqZsXF1bL5pr6wPySDtJE</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Amer, Mahetab H.</creator><creator>White, Lisa J.</creator><creator>Shakesheff, Kevin M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>The effect of injection using narrow-bore needles on mammalian cells: administration and formulation considerations for cell therapies</title><author>Amer, Mahetab H. ; White, Lisa J. ; Shakesheff, Kevin M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6222-63dd386d26bef13042af6c74721e4e7668b31118365678e573e421ccd8deb8df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>cell injection</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>cell therapies</topic><topic>Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Cellular Senescence</topic><topic>Injections - adverse effects</topic><topic>Injections - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Needles - adverse effects</topic><topic>NIH 3T3</topic><topic>NIH 3T3 Cells</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Suspensions</topic><topic>viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amer, Mahetab H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakesheff, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amer, Mahetab H.</au><au>White, Lisa J.</au><au>Shakesheff, Kevin M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of injection using narrow-bore needles on mammalian cells: administration and formulation considerations for cell therapies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>640</spage><epage>650</epage><pages>640-650</pages><issn>0022-3573</issn><eissn>2042-7158</eissn><coden>JPPMAB</coden><abstract>Objectives This study focuses on the effect of the injection administration process on a range of cell characteristics. Methods Effects of different ejection rates, needle sizes and cell suspension densities were assessed in terms of viability, membrane integrity, apoptosis and senescence of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. For ratiometric measurements, a multiplex assay was used to verify cell viability, cytotoxicity and apoptosis independent of cell number. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels and viscosity‐modifying excipients was also assessed. Key findings Ejections at 150 μl/min resulted in the highest percentage of dose being delivered as viable cells among ejection rates tested. The difference in proportions of apoptotic cells became apparent 48 h after ejection, with proportions being higher in samples ejected at slower rates. Co‐delivery with alginate hydrogels demonstrated a protective action on the cell payload. Conclusions This study demonstrates the importance of careful consideration of administration protocols required for successful delivery of cell suspensions, according to their nature and cellular responses post‐ejection.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25623928</pmid><doi>10.1111/jphp.12362</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3573
ispartof Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology, 2015-05, Vol.67 (5), p.640-650
issn 0022-3573
2042-7158
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4964945
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animals
Apoptosis
cell injection
Cell Survival
cell therapies
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - instrumentation
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy - methods
Cellular Senescence
Injections - adverse effects
Injections - instrumentation
Mice
Needles - adverse effects
NIH 3T3
NIH 3T3 Cells
Research Paper
Research Papers
Suspensions
viability
title The effect of injection using narrow-bore needles on mammalian cells: administration and formulation considerations for cell therapies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T03%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20injection%20using%20narrow-bore%20needles%20on%20mammalian%20cells:%20administration%20and%20formulation%20considerations%20for%20cell%20therapies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Amer,%20Mahetab%20H.&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=650&rft.pages=640-650&rft.issn=0022-3573&rft.eissn=2042-7158&rft.coden=JPPMAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jphp.12362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3661111801%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6222-63dd386d26bef13042af6c74721e4e7668b31118365678e573e421ccd8deb8df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674565406&rft_id=info:pmid/25623928&rfr_iscdi=true