Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty

To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been developed and/or used with patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery and to provide a shortlist of the most promising generic and condition-specific instruments. A systematic review of the literature was performed to iden...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient related outcome measures 2016-01, Vol.7, p.101-108
Main Authors: Harris, Kristina, Dawson, Jill, Gibbons, Elizabeth, Lim, Chris R, Beard, David J, Fitzpatrick, Raymond, Price, Andrew J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agreements
Clinical trials
Evidence-based medicine
Hygiene
Joint surgery
Knee
Medical research
Patients
Product development
Quality of life
Quantitative psychology
Researchers
Review
Rheumatology
Surgery
Systematic review
Task forces
Validity
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been developed and/or used with patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery and to provide a shortlist of the most promising generic and condition-specific instruments. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement and extract and evaluate information on their methodological quality. Thirty-two shortlisted measures were reviewed for the quality of their measurement properties. On the basis of the review criteria, the measures with most complete evidence to date are the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) (for patients undergoing hip replacement surgery) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), with OKS-Activity and Participation Questionnaire (for patients undergoing knee replacement surgery). A large number of these instruments lack essential evidence of their measurement properties (eg, validity, reliability, and responsiveness) in specific populations of patients. Further research is required on almost all of the identified measures. The best-performing condition-specific PROMs were the OKS, OHS, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. The best-performing generic measure was the Short Form 12. Researchers can use the information presented in this review to inform further psychometric studies of the reviewed measures.
ISSN:1179-271X
1179-271X
DOI:10.2147/PROM.S97774