Loading…
A Randomized Controlled Trial of IVR-Based Alcohol Brief Intervention to Promote Patient–Provider Communication in Primary Care
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Brief interventions for unhealthy drinking in primary care settings are efficacious, but underutilized. Efforts to improve rates of brief intervention though provider education and office systems redesign have had limited impact. Our novel brief intervention uses interactive voic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2016-09, Vol.31 (9), p.996-1003 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Brief interventions for unhealthy drinking in primary care settings are efficacious, but underutilized. Efforts to improve rates of brief intervention though provider education and office systems redesign have had limited impact. Our novel brief intervention uses interactive voice response (IVR) to provide information and advice directly to unhealthy drinkers before a physician office visit, with the goals of stimulating in-office dialogue about drinking and decreasing unhealthy drinking. This automated approach is potentially scalable for wide application.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to examine the effect of a pre-visit IVR-delivered brief alcohol intervention (IVR-BI) on patient–provider discussions of alcohol during the visit.
DESIGN
This was a parallel group randomized controlled trial with two treatment arms: 1) IVR-BI or 2) usual care (no IVR-BI).
PARTICIPANTS
In all, 1,567 patients were recruited from eight university medical center-affiliated internal medicine and family medicine clinics.
INTERVENTIONS
IVR-BI is a brief alcohol intervention delivered by automated telephone. It has four components, based on the intervention steps outlined in the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism guidelines for clinicians: 1) ask about alcohol use, 2) assess for alcohol use disorders, 3) advise patient to cut down or quit drinking, and 4) follow up at subsequent visits.
MAIN MEASURES
Outcomes were patient reported: patient–provider discussion of alcohol during the visit; patient initiation of the discussion; and provider’s recommendation about the patient’s alcohol use.
KEY RESULTS
Patients randomized to IVR-BI were more likely to have reported discussing alcohol with their provider (52 % vs. 44 %,
p
= 0.003), bringing up the topic themselves (20 % vs. 12 %,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11606-016-3692-4 |