Loading…

Antibiotic prophylaxis and its appropriate timing for urological surgical procedures in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria: A systematic review

Objective: To review the existing literature on when and how to treat patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) who undergo urological surgery, as uncertainty about this issue persists. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to compare the different timing of administration of antibiotic proph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arab Journal of Urology 2016-09, Vol.14 (3), p.234-239
Main Authors: Ramos, Jorge A., Salinas, Diego F., Osorio, Johanna, Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-506302290d5a4d7dd22b7db6fb1ceff2bfcd02254da857bd82a7ba51f61963d73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-506302290d5a4d7dd22b7db6fb1ceff2bfcd02254da857bd82a7ba51f61963d73
container_end_page 239
container_issue 3
container_start_page 234
container_title Arab Journal of Urology
container_volume 14
creator Ramos, Jorge A.
Salinas, Diego F.
Osorio, Johanna
Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
description Objective: To review the existing literature on when and how to treat patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) who undergo urological surgery, as uncertainty about this issue persists. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to compare the different timing of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB undergoing urological surgery. We used predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and we also developed a specific quality scale to assess the quality of the papers included. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the nine studies included, eight evaluated antibiotic prophylaxis regardless of the presence of AB, as their purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for urological procedures. Of these, four studies showed a significant reduction in the rate of infections in the intervention group compared with placebo, or with the same antibiotic therapy but using different durations of therapy. Four studies found no significant differences in infectious complications between the intervention and comparison arms. Only one study assessed the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB. Conclusions: With the available evidence, antibiotic therapy should be considered only for procedures in which studies have shown a clinical benefit in the prevention of infection. It is important to establish the duration and type of treatment for antimicrobial therapy for surgical prophylaxis in patients with AB who are going to receive urological invasive procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aju.2016.05.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4983160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4983160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-506302290d5a4d7dd22b7db6fb1ceff2bfcd02254da857bd82a7ba51f61963d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3DAUhU1paUKaB-hOLzCuJFv-KaUwhKYNBLppoTtx9TdzB9sykpypn6MvXA0ugS6yugcdnU8_pyjeM1oyypoPpxJOS8mzLKkoKeWvimtOe7oTfffr9bPuu6viNkZUtK7bitKueVtc8VbUbd2018Wf_ZRQoU-oyRz8fFwH-I2RwGQIpjzny2pASJYkHHE6EOcDWYIf_AE1DCQuYRN5o7ZmCTYSnMgMCe2UCWdMRwJxHefkR7ico0AnG3DJ1I9kT-Iak92cYJ_Qnt8VbxwM0d7-mzfFz_svP-6-7R6_f3242z_utKB12gnaVJTznhoBtWmN4Vy1RjVOMW2d48ppk31RG-hEq0zHoVUgmGtY31SmrW6Kzxt3XtRojc7XDTDI_NoRwio9oPzfmfAoD_5J1n1XsYZmANsAOvgYg3XPWUblpSR5krkkeSlJUiFzSTnzacvglD9yhLMPg5EJ1sEHF2DSGGX1cvwvIBWgCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis and its appropriate timing for urological surgical procedures in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria: A systematic review</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis (Open access)</source><creator>Ramos, Jorge A. ; Salinas, Diego F. ; Osorio, Johanna ; Ruano-Ravina, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Jorge A. ; Salinas, Diego F. ; Osorio, Johanna ; Ruano-Ravina, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To review the existing literature on when and how to treat patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) who undergo urological surgery, as uncertainty about this issue persists. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to compare the different timing of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB undergoing urological surgery. We used predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and we also developed a specific quality scale to assess the quality of the papers included. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the nine studies included, eight evaluated antibiotic prophylaxis regardless of the presence of AB, as their purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for urological procedures. Of these, four studies showed a significant reduction in the rate of infections in the intervention group compared with placebo, or with the same antibiotic therapy but using different durations of therapy. Four studies found no significant differences in infectious complications between the intervention and comparison arms. Only one study assessed the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB. Conclusions: With the available evidence, antibiotic therapy should be considered only for procedures in which studies have shown a clinical benefit in the prevention of infection. It is important to establish the duration and type of treatment for antimicrobial therapy for surgical prophylaxis in patients with AB who are going to receive urological invasive procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-5998</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2090-598X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-598X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-5998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27547467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Antibiotic prophylaxis ; asymptomatic bacteriuria ; Review ; Surgical site infection ; Urological surgery ; Urological surgical procedures</subject><ispartof>Arab Journal of Urology, 2016-09, Vol.14 (3), p.234-239</ispartof><rights>2016 Arab Association of Urology 2016</rights><rights>2016 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. 2016 Arab Association of Urology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-506302290d5a4d7dd22b7db6fb1ceff2bfcd02254da857bd82a7ba51f61963d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-506302290d5a4d7dd22b7db6fb1ceff2bfcd02254da857bd82a7ba51f61963d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983160/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983160/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Jorge A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano-Ravina, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis and its appropriate timing for urological surgical procedures in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria: A systematic review</title><title>Arab Journal of Urology</title><description>Objective: To review the existing literature on when and how to treat patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) who undergo urological surgery, as uncertainty about this issue persists. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to compare the different timing of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB undergoing urological surgery. We used predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and we also developed a specific quality scale to assess the quality of the papers included. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the nine studies included, eight evaluated antibiotic prophylaxis regardless of the presence of AB, as their purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for urological procedures. Of these, four studies showed a significant reduction in the rate of infections in the intervention group compared with placebo, or with the same antibiotic therapy but using different durations of therapy. Four studies found no significant differences in infectious complications between the intervention and comparison arms. Only one study assessed the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB. Conclusions: With the available evidence, antibiotic therapy should be considered only for procedures in which studies have shown a clinical benefit in the prevention of infection. It is important to establish the duration and type of treatment for antimicrobial therapy for surgical prophylaxis in patients with AB who are going to receive urological invasive procedures.</description><subject>Antibiotic prophylaxis</subject><subject>asymptomatic bacteriuria</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Surgical site infection</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urological surgical procedures</subject><issn>2090-5998</issn><issn>2090-598X</issn><issn>2090-598X</issn><issn>2090-5998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1q3DAUhU1paUKaB-hOLzCuJFv-KaUwhKYNBLppoTtx9TdzB9sykpypn6MvXA0ugS6yugcdnU8_pyjeM1oyypoPpxJOS8mzLKkoKeWvimtOe7oTfffr9bPuu6viNkZUtK7bitKueVtc8VbUbd2018Wf_ZRQoU-oyRz8fFwH-I2RwGQIpjzny2pASJYkHHE6EOcDWYIf_AE1DCQuYRN5o7ZmCTYSnMgMCe2UCWdMRwJxHefkR7ico0AnG3DJ1I9kT-Iak92cYJ_Qnt8VbxwM0d7-mzfFz_svP-6-7R6_f3242z_utKB12gnaVJTznhoBtWmN4Vy1RjVOMW2d48ppk31RG-hEq0zHoVUgmGtY31SmrW6Kzxt3XtRojc7XDTDI_NoRwio9oPzfmfAoD_5J1n1XsYZmANsAOvgYg3XPWUblpSR5krkkeSlJUiFzSTnzacvglD9yhLMPg5EJ1sEHF2DSGGX1cvwvIBWgCw</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Ramos, Jorge A.</creator><creator>Salinas, Diego F.</creator><creator>Osorio, Johanna</creator><creator>Ruano-Ravina, Alberto</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis and its appropriate timing for urological surgical procedures in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria: A systematic review</title><author>Ramos, Jorge A. ; Salinas, Diego F. ; Osorio, Johanna ; Ruano-Ravina, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-506302290d5a4d7dd22b7db6fb1ceff2bfcd02254da857bd82a7ba51f61963d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic prophylaxis</topic><topic>asymptomatic bacteriuria</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Surgical site infection</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urological surgical procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Jorge A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano-Ravina, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis (Open access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Arab Journal of Urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos, Jorge A.</au><au>Salinas, Diego F.</au><au>Osorio, Johanna</au><au>Ruano-Ravina, Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic prophylaxis and its appropriate timing for urological surgical procedures in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Arab Journal of Urology</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>234</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>234-239</pages><issn>2090-5998</issn><issn>2090-598X</issn><eissn>2090-598X</eissn><eissn>2090-5998</eissn><abstract>Objective: To review the existing literature on when and how to treat patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) who undergo urological surgery, as uncertainty about this issue persists. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to compare the different timing of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB undergoing urological surgery. We used predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and we also developed a specific quality scale to assess the quality of the papers included. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the nine studies included, eight evaluated antibiotic prophylaxis regardless of the presence of AB, as their purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for urological procedures. Of these, four studies showed a significant reduction in the rate of infections in the intervention group compared with placebo, or with the same antibiotic therapy but using different durations of therapy. Four studies found no significant differences in infectious complications between the intervention and comparison arms. Only one study assessed the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with AB. Conclusions: With the available evidence, antibiotic therapy should be considered only for procedures in which studies have shown a clinical benefit in the prevention of infection. It is important to establish the duration and type of treatment for antimicrobial therapy for surgical prophylaxis in patients with AB who are going to receive urological invasive procedures.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>27547467</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aju.2016.05.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2090-5998
ispartof Arab Journal of Urology, 2016-09, Vol.14 (3), p.234-239
issn 2090-5998
2090-598X
2090-598X
2090-5998
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4983160
source PubMed Central; Taylor & Francis (Open access)
subjects Antibiotic prophylaxis
asymptomatic bacteriuria
Review
Surgical site infection
Urological surgery
Urological surgical procedures
title Antibiotic prophylaxis and its appropriate timing for urological surgical procedures in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria: A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A51%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20prophylaxis%20and%20its%20appropriate%20timing%20for%20urological%20surgical%20procedures%20in%20patients%20with%20asymptomatic%20bacteriuria:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Arab%20Journal%20of%20Urology&rft.au=Ramos,%20Jorge%20A.&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=234&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=234-239&rft.issn=2090-5998&rft.eissn=2090-598X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aju.2016.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4983160%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-506302290d5a4d7dd22b7db6fb1ceff2bfcd02254da857bd82a7ba51f61963d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/27547467&rfr_iscdi=true