Loading…

Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience

To investigate the feasibility of exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating prostate cancers at 3 T. 74 consecutive patients with surgically confirmed single peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer ≥0.5 cm(3) who underwent pre-operativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of radiology 2016, Vol.89 (1058), p.20150470-20150470
Main Authors: Park, Sung Y, Kim, Chan K, Park, Jung J, Park, Byung K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate the feasibility of exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating prostate cancers at 3 T. 74 consecutive patients with surgically confirmed single peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer ≥0.5 cm(3) who underwent pre-operative DWI at 3 T were retrospectively selected. Based on radiological-pathological correlation, eADC and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (×10(-3) mm(2) s(-1)) for the cancers and benign PZ were measured by two independent readers. Tumour eADC or ADC was correlated with Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to differentiate between Gleason score 6 and 7 or higher, by eADC and ADC. Lesion-to-background contrast ratio was compared between eADC and ADC. Mean tumour eADC (0.48-0.50) and ADC (0.72-0.75) were significantly different from those of benign PZ (eADC, 0.20-0.27; ADC, 1.34-1.66), respectively (p  0.05). Lesion-to-background contrast ratio of eADC (Reader 1, 2.43; Reader 2, 2.23) was significantly greater than that of ADC (Reader 1, 2.21; Reader 2, 2.12) (p 
ISSN:0007-1285
1748-880X
DOI:10.1259/bjr.20150470