Loading…
Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience
To investigate the feasibility of exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating prostate cancers at 3 T. 74 consecutive patients with surgically confirmed single peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer ≥0.5 cm(3) who underwent pre-operativ...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of radiology 2016, Vol.89 (1058), p.20150470-20150470 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To investigate the feasibility of exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating prostate cancers at 3 T.
74 consecutive patients with surgically confirmed single peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer ≥0.5 cm(3) who underwent pre-operative DWI at 3 T were retrospectively selected. Based on radiological-pathological correlation, eADC and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (×10(-3) mm(2) s(-1)) for the cancers and benign PZ were measured by two independent readers. Tumour eADC or ADC was correlated with Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to differentiate between Gleason score 6 and 7 or higher, by eADC and ADC. Lesion-to-background contrast ratio was compared between eADC and ADC.
Mean tumour eADC (0.48-0.50) and ADC (0.72-0.75) were significantly different from those of benign PZ (eADC, 0.20-0.27; ADC, 1.34-1.66), respectively (p 0.05). Lesion-to-background contrast ratio of eADC (Reader 1, 2.43; Reader 2, 2.23) was significantly greater than that of ADC (Reader 1, 2.21; Reader 2, 2.12) (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
DOI: | 10.1259/bjr.20150470 |