Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages

• Published in: AGE 2016-02, Vol.38 (1), p.10-10, Article 10
• Main Authors: Ahtiainen, Juha P., Walker, Simon, Peltonen, Heikki, Holviala, Jarkko, Sillanpää, Elina, Karavirta, Laura, Sallinen, Janne, Mikkola, Jussi, Valkeinen, Heli, Mero, Antti, Hulmi, Juha J., Häkkinen, Keijo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Age; Aged; Aging; Aging - physiology; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cell Biology; Exercise; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gender differences; Geriatrics/Gerontology; Health care; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Investigations; Life Sciences; Male; Metabolism; Middle Aged; Molecular Medicine; Muscle strength; Muscle Strength - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Musculoskeletal system; Older people; Resistance Training - methods; Retrospective Studies; Strength training; Time Factors; Womens health; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0161-9152; 2509-2715; 1574-4647; 2509-2723
• DOI: 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1

Physical activity recommendations for public health include typically muscle-strengthening activities for a minimum of 2 days a week. The range of inter-individual variation in responses to resistance training (RT) aiming to improve health and well-being requires to be investigated. The purpose of this study was to quantify high and low responders for RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength and to examine possible effects of age and sex on these responses. Previously collected data of untrained healthy men and women (age 19 to 78 years, n  = 287 with 72 controls) were pooled for the present study. Muscle size and strength changed during RT are 4.8 ± 6.1 % (range from −11 to 30 %) and 21.1 ± 11.5 % (range from −8 to 60 %) compared to pre-RT, respectively. Age and sex did not affect to the RT responses. Fourteen percent and 12 % of the subjects were defined as high responders (>1 standard deviation (SD) from the group mean) for the RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength, respectively. When taking into account the results of non-training controls (upper 95 % CI), 29 and 7 % of the subjects were defined as low responders for the RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength, respectively. The muscle size and strength responses varied extensively between the subjects regardless of subject’s age and sex. Whether these changes are associated with, e.g., functional capacity and metabolic health improvements due to RT requires further studies.