Loading…

Differential plant invasiveness is not always driven by host promiscuity with bacterial symbionts

Acacias have been widely introduced outside their native range, with a subset of species becoming invasive in multiple parts of the world. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in acacia life history, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences invasiveness of these species. We determined whether...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AoB plants 2016-01, Vol.8
Main Authors: Klock, Metha M., Barrett, Luke G., Thrall, Peter H., Harms, Kyle E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-5a3a9d4ff51f1e7a00ca247818e3d94870e96d15266f0cc2318b6f9d6da616c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-5a3a9d4ff51f1e7a00ca247818e3d94870e96d15266f0cc2318b6f9d6da616c3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title AoB plants
container_volume 8
creator Klock, Metha M.
Barrett, Luke G.
Thrall, Peter H.
Harms, Kyle E.
description Acacias have been widely introduced outside their native range, with a subset of species becoming invasive in multiple parts of the world. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in acacia life history, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences invasiveness of these species. We determined whether more invasive acacias formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts) and found that acacias introduced to California are promiscuous hosts regardless of invasive status. Our results highlight the importance of examining mechanisms driving species invasions on different scales and in their native and introduced ranges. Identification of mechanisms that allow some species to outcompete others is a fundamental goal in ecology and invasive species management. One useful approach is to examine congeners varying in invasiveness in a comparative framework across native and invaded ranges. Acacia species have been widely introduced outside their native range of Australia, and a subset of these species have become invasive in multiple parts of the world. Within specific regions, the invasive status of these species varies. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in the life history of Acacia species, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences acacia invasiveness on a regional scale. To assess the extent to which species varying in invasiveness correspondingly differ with regard to the diversity of rhizobia they associate with, we grew seven Acacia species ranging in invasiveness in California in multiple soils from both their native (Australia) and introduced (California) ranges. In particular, the aim was to determine whether more invasive species formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts). We measured and compared plant performance, including aboveground biomass, survival, and nodulation response, as well as rhizobial community composition and richness. Host promiscuity did not differ among invasiveness categories. Acacia species that varied in invasiveness differed in aboveground biomass for only one soil and did not differ in survival or nodulation within individual soils. In addition, acacias did not differ in rhizobial richness among invasiveness categories. However, nodulation differed between regions and was generally higher in the native than introduced range. Our results suggest that all Acacia species introduced to California are promiscuous hosts and that ho
doi_str_mv 10.1093/aobpla/plw060
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5018393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/aobpla/plw060</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1819122283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-5a3a9d4ff51f1e7a00ca247818e3d94870e96d15266f0cc2318b6f9d6da616c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v3CAURVHVqonSLLutkLrpxg0PbAybSlX6KUXqJnv0jKFD5DEu4Bn538fWpGnaTdmA4OjoXS4hr4G9B6bFFcZuGvBqGo5MsmfknLMaKq4aeP7kfEYuc75j6xJcyZq9JGe8bUQDrTwn-Cl475IbS8CBrrKx0DAeMIeDG13ONGQ6xkJxOOKSaZ-2e9otdBdzoVOK-5DtHMpCj6HsaIe2uLSp8rLvQhxLfkVeeByyu3zYL8jtl8-319-qmx9fv19_vKlsXatSNShQ97X3DXhwLTJmkdetAuVEr2vVMqdlDw2X0jNruQDVSa972aMEacUF-XDSTnO3d71dEyUczJTCHtNiIgbz98sYduZnPJiGgRJarIJ3D4IUf80uF7NFc8P6JS7O2YACDZxztaFv_0Hv4pzGNZ3hjHGmdQ1ypaoTZVPMOTn_OAwws9VnTvWZU30r_-Zpgkf6d1l_Jozz9B_XPTVrqBk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002099416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential plant invasiveness is not always driven by host promiscuity with bacterial symbionts</title><source>Oxford University Press Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Klock, Metha M. ; Barrett, Luke G. ; Thrall, Peter H. ; Harms, Kyle E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klock, Metha M. ; Barrett, Luke G. ; Thrall, Peter H. ; Harms, Kyle E.</creatorcontrib><description>Acacias have been widely introduced outside their native range, with a subset of species becoming invasive in multiple parts of the world. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in acacia life history, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences invasiveness of these species. We determined whether more invasive acacias formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts) and found that acacias introduced to California are promiscuous hosts regardless of invasive status. Our results highlight the importance of examining mechanisms driving species invasions on different scales and in their native and introduced ranges. Identification of mechanisms that allow some species to outcompete others is a fundamental goal in ecology and invasive species management. One useful approach is to examine congeners varying in invasiveness in a comparative framework across native and invaded ranges. Acacia species have been widely introduced outside their native range of Australia, and a subset of these species have become invasive in multiple parts of the world. Within specific regions, the invasive status of these species varies. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in the life history of Acacia species, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences acacia invasiveness on a regional scale. To assess the extent to which species varying in invasiveness correspondingly differ with regard to the diversity of rhizobia they associate with, we grew seven Acacia species ranging in invasiveness in California in multiple soils from both their native (Australia) and introduced (California) ranges. In particular, the aim was to determine whether more invasive species formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts). We measured and compared plant performance, including aboveground biomass, survival, and nodulation response, as well as rhizobial community composition and richness. Host promiscuity did not differ among invasiveness categories. Acacia species that varied in invasiveness differed in aboveground biomass for only one soil and did not differ in survival or nodulation within individual soils. In addition, acacias did not differ in rhizobial richness among invasiveness categories. However, nodulation differed between regions and was generally higher in the native than introduced range. Our results suggest that all Acacia species introduced to California are promiscuous hosts and that host promiscuity per se does not explain the observed differences in invasiveness within this region. Our study also highlights the utility of assessing potential mechanisms of invasion in species’ native and introduced ranges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-2851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-2851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plw060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27535176</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acacia ; Biomass ; Community composition ; Congeners ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Invasiveness ; Legumes ; Life history ; Nodulation ; Nonnative species ; Strains (organisms) ; Survival ; Symbionts ; Symbiosis</subject><ispartof>AoB plants, 2016-01, Vol.8</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. 2016</rights><rights>The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.</rights><rights>The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-5a3a9d4ff51f1e7a00ca247818e3d94870e96d15266f0cc2318b6f9d6da616c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-5a3a9d4ff51f1e7a00ca247818e3d94870e96d15266f0cc2318b6f9d6da616c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018393/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018393/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1604,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27535176$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klock, Metha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Luke G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thrall, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Kyle E.</creatorcontrib><title>Differential plant invasiveness is not always driven by host promiscuity with bacterial symbionts</title><title>AoB plants</title><addtitle>AoB Plants</addtitle><description>Acacias have been widely introduced outside their native range, with a subset of species becoming invasive in multiple parts of the world. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in acacia life history, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences invasiveness of these species. We determined whether more invasive acacias formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts) and found that acacias introduced to California are promiscuous hosts regardless of invasive status. Our results highlight the importance of examining mechanisms driving species invasions on different scales and in their native and introduced ranges. Identification of mechanisms that allow some species to outcompete others is a fundamental goal in ecology and invasive species management. One useful approach is to examine congeners varying in invasiveness in a comparative framework across native and invaded ranges. Acacia species have been widely introduced outside their native range of Australia, and a subset of these species have become invasive in multiple parts of the world. Within specific regions, the invasive status of these species varies. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in the life history of Acacia species, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences acacia invasiveness on a regional scale. To assess the extent to which species varying in invasiveness correspondingly differ with regard to the diversity of rhizobia they associate with, we grew seven Acacia species ranging in invasiveness in California in multiple soils from both their native (Australia) and introduced (California) ranges. In particular, the aim was to determine whether more invasive species formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts). We measured and compared plant performance, including aboveground biomass, survival, and nodulation response, as well as rhizobial community composition and richness. Host promiscuity did not differ among invasiveness categories. Acacia species that varied in invasiveness differed in aboveground biomass for only one soil and did not differ in survival or nodulation within individual soils. In addition, acacias did not differ in rhizobial richness among invasiveness categories. However, nodulation differed between regions and was generally higher in the native than introduced range. Our results suggest that all Acacia species introduced to California are promiscuous hosts and that host promiscuity per se does not explain the observed differences in invasiveness within this region. Our study also highlights the utility of assessing potential mechanisms of invasion in species’ native and introduced ranges.</description><subject>Acacia</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Congeners</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Nodulation</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Symbionts</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><issn>2041-2851</issn><issn>2041-2851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v3CAURVHVqonSLLutkLrpxg0PbAybSlX6KUXqJnv0jKFD5DEu4Bn538fWpGnaTdmA4OjoXS4hr4G9B6bFFcZuGvBqGo5MsmfknLMaKq4aeP7kfEYuc75j6xJcyZq9JGe8bUQDrTwn-Cl475IbS8CBrrKx0DAeMIeDG13ONGQ6xkJxOOKSaZ-2e9otdBdzoVOK-5DtHMpCj6HsaIe2uLSp8rLvQhxLfkVeeByyu3zYL8jtl8-319-qmx9fv19_vKlsXatSNShQ97X3DXhwLTJmkdetAuVEr2vVMqdlDw2X0jNruQDVSa972aMEacUF-XDSTnO3d71dEyUczJTCHtNiIgbz98sYduZnPJiGgRJarIJ3D4IUf80uF7NFc8P6JS7O2YACDZxztaFv_0Hv4pzGNZ3hjHGmdQ1ypaoTZVPMOTn_OAwws9VnTvWZU30r_-Zpgkf6d1l_Jozz9B_XPTVrqBk</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Klock, Metha M.</creator><creator>Barrett, Luke G.</creator><creator>Thrall, Peter H.</creator><creator>Harms, Kyle E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Differential plant invasiveness is not always driven by host promiscuity with bacterial symbionts</title><author>Klock, Metha M. ; Barrett, Luke G. ; Thrall, Peter H. ; Harms, Kyle E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-5a3a9d4ff51f1e7a00ca247818e3d94870e96d15266f0cc2318b6f9d6da616c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acacia</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Congeners</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Nodulation</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Symbionts</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klock, Metha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Luke G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thrall, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, Kyle E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford University Press Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AoB plants</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klock, Metha M.</au><au>Barrett, Luke G.</au><au>Thrall, Peter H.</au><au>Harms, Kyle E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential plant invasiveness is not always driven by host promiscuity with bacterial symbionts</atitle><jtitle>AoB plants</jtitle><addtitle>AoB Plants</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issn>2041-2851</issn><eissn>2041-2851</eissn><abstract>Acacias have been widely introduced outside their native range, with a subset of species becoming invasive in multiple parts of the world. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in acacia life history, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences invasiveness of these species. We determined whether more invasive acacias formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts) and found that acacias introduced to California are promiscuous hosts regardless of invasive status. Our results highlight the importance of examining mechanisms driving species invasions on different scales and in their native and introduced ranges. Identification of mechanisms that allow some species to outcompete others is a fundamental goal in ecology and invasive species management. One useful approach is to examine congeners varying in invasiveness in a comparative framework across native and invaded ranges. Acacia species have been widely introduced outside their native range of Australia, and a subset of these species have become invasive in multiple parts of the world. Within specific regions, the invasive status of these species varies. Our study examined whether a key mechanism in the life history of Acacia species, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, influences acacia invasiveness on a regional scale. To assess the extent to which species varying in invasiveness correspondingly differ with regard to the diversity of rhizobia they associate with, we grew seven Acacia species ranging in invasiveness in California in multiple soils from both their native (Australia) and introduced (California) ranges. In particular, the aim was to determine whether more invasive species formed symbioses with a wider diversity of rhizobial strains (i.e. are more promiscuous hosts). We measured and compared plant performance, including aboveground biomass, survival, and nodulation response, as well as rhizobial community composition and richness. Host promiscuity did not differ among invasiveness categories. Acacia species that varied in invasiveness differed in aboveground biomass for only one soil and did not differ in survival or nodulation within individual soils. In addition, acacias did not differ in rhizobial richness among invasiveness categories. However, nodulation differed between regions and was generally higher in the native than introduced range. Our results suggest that all Acacia species introduced to California are promiscuous hosts and that host promiscuity per se does not explain the observed differences in invasiveness within this region. Our study also highlights the utility of assessing potential mechanisms of invasion in species’ native and introduced ranges.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>27535176</pmid><doi>10.1093/aobpla/plw060</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-2851
ispartof AoB plants, 2016-01, Vol.8
issn 2041-2851
2041-2851
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5018393
source Oxford University Press Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Acacia
Biomass
Community composition
Congeners
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Invasive species
Invasiveness
Legumes
Life history
Nodulation
Nonnative species
Strains (organisms)
Survival
Symbionts
Symbiosis
title Differential plant invasiveness is not always driven by host promiscuity with bacterial symbionts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A52%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20plant%20invasiveness%20is%20not%20always%20driven%20by%20host%20promiscuity%20with%20bacterial%20symbionts&rft.jtitle=AoB%20plants&rft.au=Klock,%20Metha%20M.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issn=2041-2851&rft.eissn=2041-2851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aobpla/plw060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1819122283%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-5a3a9d4ff51f1e7a00ca247818e3d94870e96d15266f0cc2318b6f9d6da616c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002099416&rft_id=info:pmid/27535176&rft_oup_id=10.1093/aobpla/plw060&rfr_iscdi=true