A mixed‐method study of pain management practice in a UK children's hospital: identification of barriers and developing strategies to maintain effective in‐patient paediatric pain management

• Published in: Nursing open 2016-01, Vol.3 (1), p.19-29
• Main Authors: Beckett, Kate, Henderson, Ellen M., Parry, Sarah, Stoddart, Peter, Fletcher, Margaret
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Children & youth; efficacy; hospital; Hospitals; inpatient; Medical research; Mixed methods research; Nursing; pain; Pain management; pain service; Pediatrics; post surgical
• ISSN: 2054-1058; 2054-1058
• DOI: 10.1002/nop2.33

Aim To assess Acute Pain Service and paediatric pain management efficacy in a UK specialist paediatric hospital to inform wider recommendations for future sustainability. Background UK paediatric acute pain services vary. Although comprehensive pain management guidelines exist, consensus on the best model of care is lacking. Worldwide, medical and pharmacological advances and rapid patient turnover have increased the challenges of managing hospitalized children's pain. Simultaneously nurses, who deliver the bulk of pain management, have experienced reduction in skill mix and training opportunities. Specialist Acute Pain Services have evolved to meet these demands; their overall efficacy is unknown. Design This mixed‐methods study explores pain management practice at a UK paediatric hospital to assess current efficacy and future sustainability. Method A 2013 case note review of all Acute Pain Services referrals over 14 days were compared with an interval sample of concurrent non‐referred inpatient children; seven semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a range of clinical staff. Results Twenty‐two referrals of 15 children were made; 15 comparison children were identified. All 30 children (100%) were appropriately referred/non‐referred. Acute Pain Services cases experienced higher pain levels, were more likely to have long term conditions, longer hospital stay and repeat admissions. Three key themes emerged through interview analysis: ‘addressing pain’, ‘changing contexts’ ‘pain as an “expert” skill’. Increased specialization, reduced clarity between different pain modalities and decreased training opportunities had resulted in potentially unsustainable APS dependence.