Evaluating the Quality of Behavior Analytic Practitioner Training Programs

Dixon and colleagues (2015) asserted that faculty research productivity is a key indicator of the quality of university programs that train future practitioners of behavior analysis. Based on their analysis of publications in select journals, the authors concluded that many faculty in such programs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavior analysis in practice 2015-10, Vol.8 (2), p.149-151
Main Authors: Ahearn, William H., Green, Gina, Riordan, Mary M., Weatherly, Nicholas L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied behavior analysis
Author productivity
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Certification
Developmental disabilities
Discussion and Review Paper
Presidents
Professionals
Professions
Psychology
Research methodology
Training
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dixon and colleagues (2015) asserted that faculty research productivity is a key indicator of the quality of university programs that train future practitioners of behavior analysis. Based on their analysis of publications in select journals, the authors concluded that many faculty in such programs have published little to no research. Some alternative measures of both faculty research productivity and the quality of practitioner training programs are suggested here.
ISSN:1998-1929
2196-8934
DOI:10.1007/s40617-015-0085-9